Literature DB >> 29609816

Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems.

Muhammad U Ghani1, Molly D Wong2, Farid H Omoumi3, Bin Zheng4, Laurie L Fajardo5, Aimin Yan6, Xizeng Wu7, Hong Liu8.   

Abstract

This study compared the detectability of simulated tumors using a high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) prototype and a commercial attenuation-based DBT system. Each system imaged a 5-cm thick modular breast phantom with 50-50 adipose-glandular percentage density containing contrast-detail (CD) test objects to simulate different tumor sizes. A commercial DBT system acquired 15 projection views over 15 degrees (15d-15p) was used to acquire the attenuation-based projection views and to reconstruct the conventional DBT slices. Attenuation-based projection views were acquired at 32 kV, 46 mAs with a mean glandular dose (Dg) of 1.6 mGy. For acquiring phase sensitive projection views, the prototype utilized two acquisition geometries: 11 projection views were acquired over 15 degrees (15d-11p), and 17 projection views were acquired over 16 degrees (16d-17p) at 120 kV, 5.27 mAs with 1.51 mGy under the magnification (M) of 2. A phase retrieval algorithm based on the phase-attenuation duality (PAD) was applied to each projection view, and a modified Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm was used to reconstruct the phase sensitive DBT slices. Simulated tumor margins were rated as more conspicuous and better visualized for both phase sensitive acquisition geometries versus conventional DBT imaging. The CD curves confirmed the improvement in both contrast and spatial resolutions with the phase sensitive DBT imaging. The superiority of the phase sensitive DBT imaging was further endorsed by higher contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and figure-of-merit (FOM) values. The CNR improvements provided by the phase sensitive DBT prototype were sufficient to offset the noise reduction provided by the attenuation-based DBT imaging.
Copyright © 2018 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital breast tomosynthesis; High energy X-rays; Phase contrast imaging; Phase retrieval; Radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29609816      PMCID: PMC5886025          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  37 in total

1.  Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.

Authors:  Eric A Berns; R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An experimental method of determining relative phase-contrast factor for x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  Xizeng Wua; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype.

Authors:  Di Wu; Aimin Yan; Yuhua Li; Molly D Wong; Bin Zheng; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A Monte Carlo study of monoenergetic and polyenergetic normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients in mammography.

Authors:  Antonio Sarno; Giovanni Mettivier; Francesca Di Lillo; Paolo Russo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Cone-beam micro computed tomography dedicated to the breast.

Authors:  Antonio Sarno; Giovanni Mettivier; Francesca Di Lillo; Mario Cesarelli; Paolo Bifulco; Paolo Russo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dose and detectability improvements with high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging in comparison to low energy conventional imaging.

Authors:  Molly Donovan Wong; Aimin Yan; Muhammad Ghani; Yuhua Li; Laurie Fajardo; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  In-line phase-contrast breast tomosynthesis: a phantom feasibility study at a synchrotron radiation facility.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; P Russo; Z Kamarianakis; G Mettivier; H Requardt; A Bravin; I Buliev
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique.

Authors:  Edoardo Castelli; Maura Tonutti; Fulvia Arfelli; Renata Longo; Emilio Quaia; Luigi Rigon; Daniela Sanabor; Fabrizio Zanconati; Diego Dreossi; Alessando Abrami; Elisa Quai; Paola Bregant; Katia Casarin; Valentina Chenda; Ralf Hendrik Menk; Tatjana Rokvic; Alessandro Vascotto; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Robust phase-retrieval-based X-ray tomography for morphological assessment of early hepatic echinococcosis infection in rats.

Authors:  Huiqiang Liu; Chuanshan Zhang; Xiaoxi Fan; Yingni Duan; Tiqiao Xiao; Guohao Du; Yanan Fu; Haigang Liu; Hao Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of a single distance phase retrieval algorithm on spatial resolution in X-ray inline phase sensitive imaging.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Bradley Gregory; Farid Omoumi; Bin Zheng; Aimin Yan; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Biomed Spectrosc Imaging       Date:  2019-02-22

2.  The Potential of Utilizing Mid-Energy X-Rays for In-Line Phase Sensitive Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  F H Omoumi; M U Ghani; M D Wong; Y Li; B Zheng; A Yan; P A Jenkins; X Wu; H Liu
Journal:  Biomed Spectrosc Imaging       Date:  2020-12-28

3.  Development and preclinical evaluation of a patient-specific high energy x-ray phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Xizeng Wu; Laurie L Fajardo; Zhengxue Jing; Molly D Wong; Bin Zheng; Farid Omoumi; Yuhua Li; Aimin Yan; Peter Jenkins; Stephen L Hillis; Laura Linstroth; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.