Literature DB >> 28924570

Implementation and CT sampling characterization of a third-generation SPECT-CT system for dedicated breast imaging.

Jainil P Shah1,2, Steve D Mann2,3, Randolph L McKinley4, Martin P Tornai1,2,3.   

Abstract

Stand-alone cone beam computed tomography (CT) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems capable of complex acquisition trajectories have previously been developed for breast imaging. Fully three-dimensional (3-D) motions of SPECT systems provide views into the chest wall and throughout the entire volume. The polar tilting capability of the CBCT system has shown improvement in sampling close to the chest wall, while eliminating cone beam artifacts. Here, a single hybrid SPECT-CT system, with each individual modality capable of independently traversing complex trajectories around a common pendant breast volume, was developed. We present the practical implementation of this design and preliminary results of the CT system. The fully 3-D SPECT was nested inside the suspended CT gantry and oriented perpendicular to the CT source-detector pair. Both subsystems were positioned on a rotation stage, with the combined polar and azimuthal motions enabling spherical trajectories. Six trajectories were used for initial evaluation of the tilt capable CT system. The developed system can achieve polar tilt angles with a [Formula: see text] positioning error and no hysteresis. Initial imaging results demonstrate that additional off-axis projection views of various geometric resolution phantoms facilitate more complete sampling, more consistent attenuation value recovery, and markedly improved reconstructions. This system could have various applications in diagnostic or therapeutic breast imaging.

Keywords:  breast computed tomography; breast single-photon emission computed tomography; complex trajectories; fully suspended computed tomography; three-dimensional sampling

Year:  2017        PMID: 28924570      PMCID: PMC5536183          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.033502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  41 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.

Authors:  Mitra Noroozian; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Sahand Rahnama-Moghadam; Katherine A Klein; Deborah O Jeffries; Renee W Pinsky; Heang-Ping Chan; Paul L Carson; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.

Authors:  Avice O'Connell; David L Conover; Yan Zhang; Posy Seifert; Wende Logan-Young; Chuen-Fu Linda Lin; Lawrence Sahler; Ruola Ning
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; P Salzmann; K A Phillips; J A Cauley; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Authors:  David Gur; Gordon S Abrams; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Ronald L Perrin; Grace Y Rathfon; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Evolution of spatial resolution in breast CT at UC Davis.

Authors:  Peymon M Gazi; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study. A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterization of CT Hounsfield Units for 3D acquisition trajectories on a dedicated breast CT system.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.535

2.  Detection of Microcalcifications in Spiral Breast Computed Tomography with Photon-Counting Detector Is Feasible: A Specimen Study.

Authors:  Matthias Wetzl; Evelyn Wenkel; Eva Balbach; Ebba Dethlefsen; Arndt Hartmann; Julius Emons; Christiane Kuhl; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Uder; Sabine Ohlmeyer
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.