Literature DB >> 25164651

Within-hemifield competition in early visual areas limits the ability to track multiple objects with attention.

Viola S Störmer1, George A Alvarez2, Patrick Cavanagh3.   

Abstract

It is much easier to divide attention across the left and right visual hemifields than within the same visual hemifield. Here we investigate whether this benefit of dividing attention across separate visual fields is evident at early cortical processing stages. We measured the steady-state visual evoked potential, an oscillatory response of the visual cortex elicited by flickering stimuli, of moving targets and distractors while human observers performed a tracking task. The amplitude of responses at the target frequencies was larger than that of the distractor frequencies when participants tracked two targets in separate hemifields, indicating that attention can modulate early visual processing when it is divided across hemifields. However, these attentional modulations disappeared when both targets were tracked within the same hemifield. These effects were not due to differences in task performance, because accuracy was matched across the tracking conditions by adjusting target speed (with control conditions ruling out effects due to speed alone). To investigate later processing stages, we examined the P3 component over central-parietal scalp sites that was elicited by the test probe at the end of the trial. The P3 amplitude was larger for probes on targets than on distractors, regardless of whether attention was divided across or within a hemifield, indicating that these higher-level processes were not constrained by visual hemifield. These results suggest that modulating early processing stages enables more efficient target tracking, and that within-hemifield competition limits the ability to modulate multiple target representations within the hemifield maps of the early visual cortex.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3311526-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG/SSVEP; hemifield independence; tracking; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25164651      PMCID: PMC4145167          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0980-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load.

Authors:  J C Culham; P Cavanagh; N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Brain areas specific for attentional load in a motion-tracking task.

Authors:  J Jovicich; R J Peters; C Koch; J Braun; L Chang; T Ernst
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie A McMains; David C Somers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The attentional 'spotlight's' penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Discrimination within and between hemifields: a new constraint on theories of attention.

Authors:  A B Sereno; S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  S T Morgan; J C Hansen; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Allocation of attention in the visual field.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; Y Y Yeh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J Moran; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Attention to Multiple Objects Facilitates Their Integration in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yee-Joon Kim; Jeffrey J Tsai; Jeffrey Ojemann; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Divided attention in the tactile modality.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Thomas Andrillon; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The what and when of olfactory working memory in humans.

Authors:  Andrew I Yang; Gulce N Dikecligil; Heidi Jiang; Sandhitsu R Das; Joel M Stein; Stephan U Schuele; Joshua M Rosenow; Kathryn A Davis; Timothy H Lucas; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Mid-level Feature Differences Support Early Animacy and Object Size Distinctions: Evidence from Electroencephalography Decoding.

Authors:  Ruosi Wang; Daniel Janini; Talia Konkle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 10.  The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training.

Authors:  Christos Constantinidis; Torkel Klingberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.