Literature DB >> 2932532

Allocation of attention in the visual field.

C W Eriksen, Y Y Yeh.   

Abstract

This research investigated whether attentional resources can be simultaneously allocated to several locations in a visual display, whether the mode of processing (serial or parallel) can be switched within a trial, and the nature of the costs when attentional resources are concentrated on an invalid location. Subjects were required to determine which of two target letters was present in eight-letter circular displays. In precue conditions, a primary and a secondary target location were designated 150 ms before target onset by an indicator that varied in validity. In the control conditions no cue was provided. A second experiment verified several assumptions that had been made in interpreting the data of Experiment 1. Modifications in Jonides' (1983) two-process model were suggested in terms of a zoom lens model of attentional resources. Instead of two alternative processing modes, attentional resources are conceived as capable of distribution over the visual field, but with low resolving power, or as continuously constricting to small portions of the visual field with a concomitant increase in processing power.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2932532     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.5.583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  184 in total

1.  Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellizzer; James H Hedges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members.

Authors:  Xun He; Anne G Lever; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with continuous spatial cues.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellizzer; James H Hedges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Glenn R Wylie; Beth A Higgins; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

6.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Manuela Piazza; Eric Giacomini; Denis Le Bihan; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Linda K Langley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-03

9.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Naomi Vanlessen; Valentina Rossi; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.