Literature DB >> 25151504

Computer-extracted MR imaging features are associated with survival in glioblastoma patients.

Maciej A Mazurowski1, Jing Zhang, Katherine B Peters, Hasan Hobbs.   

Abstract

Automatic survival prognosis in glioblastoma (GBM) could result in improved treatment planning for the patient. The purpose of this research is to investigate the association of survival in GBM patients with tumor features in pre-operative magnetic resonance (MR) images assessed using a fully automatic computer algorithm. MR imaging data for 68 patients from two US institutions were used in this study. The images were obtained from the Cancer Imaging Archive. A fully automatic computer vision algorithm was applied to segment the images and extract eight imaging features from the MRI studies. The features included tumor side, proportion of enhancing tumor, proportion of necrosis, T1/FLAIR ratio, major axis length, minor axis length, tumor volume, and thickness of enhancing margin. We constructed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and used a likelihood ratio test to establish whether the imaging features are prognostic of survival. We also evaluated the individual prognostic value of each feature through multivariate analysis using the multivariate Cox model and univariate analysis using univariate Cox models for each feature. We found that the automatically extracted imaging features were predictive of survival (p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis of individual features showed that two individual features were predictive of survival: proportion of enhancing tumor (p = 0.013), and major axis length (p = 0.026). Univariate analysis indicated the same two features as significant (p = 0.021, and p = 0.017 respectively). We conclude that computer-extracted MR imaging features can be used for survival prognosis in GBM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151504     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1580-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  21 in total

1.  Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  John K Park; Tiffany Hodges; Leopold Arko; Michael Shen; Donna Dello Iacono; Adrian McNabb; Nancy Olsen Bailey; Teri Nguyen Kreisl; Fabio M Iwamoto; Joohee Sul; Sungyoung Auh; Grace E Park; Howard A Fine; Peter McL Black
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009.

Authors:  Therese A Dolecek; Jennifer M Propp; Nancy E Stroup; Carol Kruchko
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Howard Colman; Li Zhang; Erik P Sulman; J Matthew McDonald; Nasrin Latif Shooshtari; Andreana Rivera; Sonya Popoff; Catherine L Nutt; David N Louis; J Gregory Cairncross; Mark R Gilbert; Heidi S Phillips; Minesh P Mehta; Arnab Chakravarti; Christopher E Pelloski; Krishna Bhat; Burt G Feuerstein; Robert B Jenkins; Ken Aldape
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of survival models for glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Maciej Andrzej Mazurowski; Annick Desjardins; Jordan Milton Malof
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  A fully automatic extraction of magnetic resonance image features in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Daniel P Barboriak; Hasan Hobbs; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Decision forests for tissue-specific segmentation of high-grade gliomas in multi-channel MR.

Authors:  Darko Zikic; Ben Glocker; Ender Konukoglu; Antonio Criminisi; C Demiralp; J Shotton; O M Thomas; T Das; R Jena; S J Price
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

9.  A novel volume-age-KPS (VAK) glioblastoma classification identifies a prognostic cognate microRNA-gene signature.

Authors:  Pascal O Zinn; Pratheesh Sathyan; Bhanu Mahajan; John Bruyere; Monika Hegi; Sadhan Majumder; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Role of Biomarkers in the Clinical Management of Glioblastomas: What are the Barriers and How Can We Overcome Them?

Authors:  Kerrie L McDonald; Grace Aw; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  12 in total

1.  Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Luke Macyszyn; Hamed Akbari; Jared M Pisapia; Xiao Da; Mark Attiah; Vadim Pigrish; Yingtao Bi; Sharmistha Pal; Ramana V Davuluri; Laura Roccograndi; Nadia Dahmane; Maria Martinez-Lage; George Biros; Ronald L Wolf; Michel Bilello; Donald M O'Rourke; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Algorithmic three-dimensional analysis of tumor shape in MRI improves prognosis of survival in glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nicholas Czarnek; Kal Clark; Katherine B Peters; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Clinical parameters outweigh diffusion- and perfusion-derived MRI parameters in predicting survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sina Burth; Philipp Kickingereder; Oliver Eidel; Diana Tichy; David Bonekamp; Lukas Weberling; Antje Wick; Sarah Löw; Anne Hertenstein; Martha Nowosielski; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Glioblastoma: does the pre-treatment geometry matter? A postcontrast T1 MRI-based study.

Authors:  Julián Pérez-Beteta; Alicia Martínez-González; David Molina; Mariano Amo-Salas; Belén Luque; Elena Arregui; Manuel Calvo; José M Borrás; Carlos López; Marta Claramonte; Juan A Barcia; Lidia Iglesias; Josué Avecillas; David Albillo; Miguel Navarro; José M Villanueva; Juan C Paniagua; Juan Martino; Carlos Velásquez; Beatriz Asenjo; Manuel Benavides; Ismael Herruzo; María Del Carmen Delgado; Ana Del Valle; Anthony Falkov; Philippe Schucht; Estanislao Arana; Luis Pérez-Romasanta; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Prediction of survival with multi-scale radiomic analysis in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Ahmad Chaddad; Siham Sabri; Tamim Niazi; Bassam Abdulkarim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A quantitative study of shape descriptors from glioblastoma multiforme phenotypes for predicting survival outcome.

Authors:  Ahmad Chaddad; Christian Desrosiers; Lama Hassan; Camel Tanougast
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A three-dimensional computational analysis of magnetic resonance images characterizes the biological aggressiveness in malignant brain tumours.

Authors:  J Pérez-Beteta; A Martínez-González; V M Pérez-García
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Ependymal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging for the identification of high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Muhammad Waqas; Muzna Iftikhar; Usman T Siddiqui; Syed Ather Enam
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-09-26

9.  Geometrical Measures Obtained from Pretreatment Postcontrast T1 Weighted MRIs Predict Survival Benefits from Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  David Molina; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Alicia Martínez-González; Juan M Sepúlveda; Sergi Peralta; Miguel J Gil-Gil; Gaspar Reynes; Ana Herrero; Ramón De Las Peñas; Raquel Luque; Jaume Capellades; Carmen Balaña; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fully automatic GBM segmentation in the TCGA-GBM dataset: Prognosis and correlation with VASARI features.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Raphael Meier; William D Dunn; Brian Alexander; Roland Wiest; Stefan Bauer; David A Gutman; Mauricio Reyes; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.