Literature DB >> 23396489

Imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of survival models for glioblastoma patients.

Maciej Andrzej Mazurowski1, Annick Desjardins, Jordan Milton Malof.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because effective prediction of survival time can be highly beneficial for the treatment of glioblastoma patients, the relationship between survival time and multiple patient characteristics has been investigated. In this paper, we investigate whether the predictive power of a survival model based on clinical patient features improves when MRI features are also included in the model.
METHODS: The subjects in this study were 82 glioblastoma patients for whom clinical features as well as MR imaging exams were made available by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Twenty-six imaging features in the available MR scans were assessed by radiologists from the TCGA Glioma Phenotype Research Group. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression to construct 2 survival models: one that used 3 clinical features (age, gender, and KPS) as the covariates and 1 that used both the imaging features and the clinical features as the covariates. Then, we used 2 measures to compare the predictive performance of these 2 models: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the 1-year survival threshold and overall concordance index. To eliminate any positive performance estimation bias, we used leave-one-out cross-validation.
RESULTS: The performance of the model based on both clinical and imaging features was higher than the performance of the model based on only the clinical features, in terms of both area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P < .01) and the overall concordance index (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging features assessed using a controlled lexicon have additional predictive value compared with clinical features when predicting survival time in glioblastoma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; VASARI; glioblastoma; proportional hazards; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23396489      PMCID: PMC3779027          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  17 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope; James Sayre; Alla Perlina; J Pablo Villablanca; Paul S Mischel; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival.

Authors:  M Lacroix; D Abi-Said; D R Fourney; Z L Gokaslan; W Shi; F DeMonte; F F Lang; I E McCutcheon; S J Hassenbusch; E Holland; K Hess; C Michael; D Miller; R Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Graziella Filippini; Chiara Falcone; Amerigo Boiardi; Giovanni Broggi; Maria G Bruzzone; Dario Caldiroli; Rita Farina; Mariangela Farinotti; Laura Fariselli; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Sergio Giombini; Bianca Pollo; Mario Savoiardo; Carlo L Solero; Maria G Valsecchi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto the new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium phase I and II clinical trials.

Authors:  Kathryn A Carson; Stuart A Grossman; Joy D Fisher; Edward G Shaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and adjustment for bias.

Authors:  Walter Stummer; Hanns-Jürgen Reulen; Thomas Meinel; Uwe Pichlmeier; Wiebke Schumacher; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Veit Rohde; Falk Oppel; Bernd Turowski; Christian Woiciechowsky; Kea Franz; Torsten Pietsch
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A comparative study of survival models for breast cancer prognostication based on microarray data: does a single gene beat them all?

Authors:  B Haibe-Kains; C Desmedt; C Sotiriou; G Bontempi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  40 in total

1.  Computer-extracted MR imaging features are associated with survival in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Jing Zhang; Katherine B Peters; Hasan Hobbs
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Motivating the additional use of external validity: examining transportability in a model of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Kyle W Singleton; William Speier; Alex A T Bui; William Hsu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

3.  Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Luke Macyszyn; Hamed Akbari; Jared M Pisapia; Xiao Da; Mark Attiah; Vadim Pigrish; Yingtao Bi; Sharmistha Pal; Ramana V Davuluri; Laura Roccograndi; Nadia Dahmane; Maria Martinez-Lage; George Biros; Ronald L Wolf; Michel Bilello; Donald M O'Rourke; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Algorithmic three-dimensional analysis of tumor shape in MRI improves prognosis of survival in glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nicholas Czarnek; Kal Clark; Katherine B Peters; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Texture Feature Ratios from Relative CBV Maps of Perfusion MRI Are Associated with Patient Survival in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  J Lee; R Jain; K Khalil; B Griffith; R Bosca; G Rao; A Rao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Volumetric quantification of glioblastoma: experiences with different measurement techniques and impact on survival.

Authors:  Christian Henker; Thomas Kriesen; Änne Glass; Björn Schneider; Jürgen Piek
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Glioblastoma: does the pre-treatment geometry matter? A postcontrast T1 MRI-based study.

Authors:  Julián Pérez-Beteta; Alicia Martínez-González; David Molina; Mariano Amo-Salas; Belén Luque; Elena Arregui; Manuel Calvo; José M Borrás; Carlos López; Marta Claramonte; Juan A Barcia; Lidia Iglesias; Josué Avecillas; David Albillo; Miguel Navarro; José M Villanueva; Juan C Paniagua; Juan Martino; Carlos Velásquez; Beatriz Asenjo; Manuel Benavides; Ismael Herruzo; María Del Carmen Delgado; Ana Del Valle; Anthony Falkov; Philippe Schucht; Estanislao Arana; Luis Pérez-Romasanta; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: can preoperative imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of a survival model?

Authors:  Mina Park; Seung-Koo Lee; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Eui Hyun Kim; Se Hoon Kim; Mi Kyung Song; Bo Gyoung Ma; Sung Soo Ahn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Radiologic image-based statistical shape analysis of brain tumours.

Authors:  Karthik Bharath; Sebastian Kurtek; Arvind Rao; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.864

10.  Integrated Biophysical Modeling and Image Analysis: Application to Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Andreas Mang; Spyridon Bakas; Shashank Subramanian; Christos Davatzikos; George Biros
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.