Literature DB >> 26188015

Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques.

Luke Macyszyn1, Hamed Akbari1, Jared M Pisapia1, Xiao Da1, Mark Attiah1, Vadim Pigrish1, Yingtao Bi1, Sharmistha Pal1, Ramana V Davuluri1, Laura Roccograndi1, Nadia Dahmane1, Maria Martinez-Lage1, George Biros1, Ronald L Wolf1, Michel Bilello1, Donald M O'Rourke1, Christos Davatzikos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MRI characteristics of brain gliomas have been used to predict clinical outcome and molecular tumor characteristics. However, previously reported imaging biomarkers have not been sufficiently accurate or reproducible to enter routine clinical practice and often rely on relatively simple MRI measures. The current study leverages advanced image analysis and machine learning algorithms to identify complex and reproducible imaging patterns predictive of overall survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma (GB).
METHODS: One hundred five patients with GB were first used to extract approximately 60 diverse features from preoperative multiparametric MRIs. These imaging features were used by a machine learning algorithm to derive imaging predictors of patient survival and molecular subtype. Cross-validation ensured generalizability of these predictors to new patients. Subsequently, the predictors were evaluated in a prospective cohort of 29 new patients.
RESULTS: Survival curves yielded a hazard ratio of 10.64 for predicted long versus short survivors. The overall, 3-way (long/medium/short survival) accuracy in the prospective cohort approached 80%. Classification of patients into the 4 molecular subtypes of GB achieved 76% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: By employing machine learning techniques, we were able to demonstrate that imaging patterns are highly predictive of patient survival. Additionally, we found that GB subtypes have distinctive imaging phenotypes. These results reveal that when imaging markers related to infiltration, cell density, microvascularity, and blood-brain barrier compromise are integrated via advanced pattern analysis methods, they form very accurate predictive biomarkers. These predictive markers used solely preoperative images, hence they can significantly augment diagnosis and treatment of GB patients.
© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glioblastoma; imaging; machine learning; predict; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188015      PMCID: PMC4767233          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  40 in total

1.  MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  A P Pathak; K M Schmainda; B D Ward; J R Linderman; K J Rebro; A S Greene
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Serial analysis of imaging parameters in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Yan Li; Janine M Lupo; Mei-Yin Polley; Jason C Crane; Wei Bian; Soonmee Cha; Susan Chang; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Fractional anisotropy value by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of cell density and proliferation activity of glioblastomas.

Authors:  Takaaki Beppu; Takashi Inoue; Yuji Shibata; Noriyuki Yamada; Akira Kurose; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Akira Ogawa; Hiroyuki Kabasawa
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-01

4.  Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules.

Authors:  Maximilian Diehn; Christine Nardini; David S Wang; Susan McGovern; Mahesh Jayaraman; Yu Liang; Kenneth Aldape; Soonmee Cha; Michael D Kuo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Identifying the survival subtypes of glioblastoma by quantitative volumetric analysis of MRI.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Haihui Jiang; Xuzhu Chen; Jiwei Bai; Yong Cui; Xiaohui Ren; Xiaolin Chen; Junmei Wang; Wei Zeng; Song Lin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Can MRI-derived factors predict the survival in glioblastoma patients treated with postoperative chemoradiation therapy?

Authors:  Hideo Nakamura; Ryuji Murakami; Toshinori Hirai; Mika Kitajima; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Relationship of pre-surgery metabolic and physiological MR imaging parameters to survival for patients with untreated GBM.

Authors:  Forrest W Crawford; Inas S Khayal; Colleen McGue; Suja Saraswathy; Andrea Pirzkall; Soonmee Cha; Kathleen R Lamborn; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Pascal O Zinn; Bhanu Mahajan; Bhanu Majadan; Pratheesh Sathyan; Sanjay K Singh; Sadhan Majumder; Ferenc A Jolesz; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  98 in total

1.  Brain Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (brain-CaPTk): An Interactive Platform for Quantitative Analysis of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Spyridon Bakas; Sarthak Pati; Hamed Akbari; Ratheesh Kalarot; Patmaa Sridharan; Martin Rozycki; Mark Bergman; Birkan Tunc; Ragini Verma; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2018-02-17

2.  Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Micah J Sheller; G Anthony Reina; Brandon Edwards; Jason Martin; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2019-01-26

3.  Predicting IDH mutation status in grade II gliomas using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI.

Authors:  Shanshan Jiang; Tianyu Zou; Charles G Eberhart; Maria A V Villalobos; Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Yu Wang; Xianlong Wang; Hao Yu; Yongxing Du; Peter C M van Zijl; Zhibo Wen; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.

Authors:  Koji Sakai; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Extracellular Domain Mutations in Glioblastoma Present Opportunities for Clinical Imaging and Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Zev A Binder; Amy Haseley Thorne; Spyridon Bakas; E Paul Wileyto; Michel Bilello; Hamed Akbari; Saima Rathore; Sung Min Ha; Logan Zhang; Cole J Ferguson; Sonika Dahiya; Wenya Linda Bi; David A Reardon; Ahmed Idbaih; Joerg Felsberg; Bettina Hentschel; Michael Weller; Stephen J Bagley; Jennifer J D Morrissette; MacLean P Nasrallah; Jianhui Ma; Ciro Zanca; Andrew M Scott; Laura Orellana; Christos Davatzikos; Frank B Furnari; Donald M O'Rourke
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Radiomics-based machine learning methods for isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype prediction of diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Shuang Wu; Jin Meng; Qi Yu; Ping Li; Shen Fu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Algorithmic three-dimensional analysis of tumor shape in MRI improves prognosis of survival in glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nicholas Czarnek; Kal Clark; Katherine B Peters; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Glioblastoma: does the pre-treatment geometry matter? A postcontrast T1 MRI-based study.

Authors:  Julián Pérez-Beteta; Alicia Martínez-González; David Molina; Mariano Amo-Salas; Belén Luque; Elena Arregui; Manuel Calvo; José M Borrás; Carlos López; Marta Claramonte; Juan A Barcia; Lidia Iglesias; Josué Avecillas; David Albillo; Miguel Navarro; José M Villanueva; Juan C Paniagua; Juan Martino; Carlos Velásquez; Beatriz Asenjo; Manuel Benavides; Ismael Herruzo; María Del Carmen Delgado; Ana Del Valle; Anthony Falkov; Philippe Schucht; Estanislao Arana; Luis Pérez-Romasanta; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  The Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (CaPTk): Technical Overview.

Authors:  Sarthak Pati; Ashish Singh; Saima Rathore; Aimilia Gastounioti; Mark Bergman; Phuc Ngo; Sung Min Ha; Dimitrios Bounias; James Minock; Grayson Murphy; Hongming Li; Amit Bhattarai; Adam Wolf; Patmaa Sridaran; Ratheesh Kalarot; Hamed Akbari; Aristeidis Sotiras; Siddhesh P Thakur; Ragini Verma; Russell T Shinohara; Paul Yushkevich; Yong Fan; Despina Kontos; Christos Davatzikos; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2020-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.