Literature DB >> 1320182

Differential-pencil-beam dose calculations for charged particles.

P L Petti1.   

Abstract

The use of a convolution or differential-pencil-beam (DPB) algorithm has been studied for charged-particle dose calculations as a means of more accurately modeling the effects of multiple scattering. Such effects are not reflected in current charged-particle dose calculations since these calculations rely on depth-dose data measured in homogeneous water-equivalent phantoms and use ray-tracing techniques to calculate the water-equivalent pathlength from patient CT data. In this study, isodose plots were generated from three-dimensional dose calculations using Monte Carlo, DPB, and standard ray-tracing methods for a 4-cm modulated 150-MeV proton beam incident on both homogenous and heterogeneous phantoms. To simulate therapy conditions with charged particles, these studies included cases where compensating boluses were introduced to modify the particle range across the treatment field. Results indicate that multiple-scattering effects, including increased penumbral width as a function of beam penetration and the "smearing" of isodose distributions downstream from complex heterogeneities, are well modeled by the DPB algorithm. The DPB algoirthm may also be used to obtain more useful estimates of the dose uncertainty in regions near the end of the beam's range downstream from complex heterogeneities than can be derived from standard ray-tracing calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1320182     DOI: 10.1118/1.596887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  19 in total

1.  The NAC proton treatment planning system.

Authors:  A N Schreuder; D T Jones; J E Symons; E A De Kock; J K Hough; J Wilson; F J Vernimmen; W Schlegel; A Höss; M Lee
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  A GPU implementation of a track-repeating algorithm for proton radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Pablo P Yepes; Dragan Mirkovic; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.

Authors:  David C Westerly; Xiaohu Mo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Thomas R Mackie; Paul M DeLuca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Monte Carlo study of radial energy deposition from primary and secondary particles for narrow and large proton beamlet source models.

Authors:  Christopher R Peeler; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Beyond Gaussians: a study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Aman Anand; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Monte Carlo fast dose calculator for proton radiotherapy: application to a voxelized geometry representing a patient with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pablo Yepes; Sharmalee Randeniya; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Quantification of proton dose calculation accuracy in the lung.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Juliane Daartz; Stephen Dowdell; Thomas Ruggieri; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.