Literature DB >> 19321923

Monte Carlo modelling of the treatment line of the Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.

A Stankovskiy1, S Kerhoas-Cavata, R Ferrand, C Nauraye, L Demarzi.   

Abstract

This paper presents the main results of a Monte Carlo simulation describing the Orsay Proton Therapy Center (CPO) beam line. The project aimed to obtain a prediction of the dose distribution in a water phantom within 2% accuracy in the dose value and a 2 mm of range. The simulation tool used was MCNPX, version 2.5.0, and included all the elements of the CPO beam line. A new algorithm of multiple Coulomb scattering has been incorporated in MCNPX, resulting in a better prediction of the spatial dose distribution and absolute values of the deposited energy. The simulations of 3D dose profiles in water show a very good agreement with measured data to within 2%. We first performed a comparative analysis of the dosimetry in heterogeneous phantoms between the pencil beam algorithm and MCNPX. The simulations give a better agreement with experimental data compared to the pencil beam approach. In a second phase, we simulated the patient-dependent fields along with the spatial dose distributions in a water phantom. The simulated response of a Pixel chamber located 2 m upstream of the water phantom revealed a good agreement with the measured data to within 1%. The results presented herein support the applicability of Monte Carlo models for absolute dosimetry and for design purposes regarding existing and new beam lines at CPO. This work completes a series of publications reporting the progress in the development of a Monte Carlo simulation tool for the CPO beam line dedicated for the treatment of head and neck tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321923     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/8/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Dragan Mirkovic; Luis A Perles; Narayan Sahoo; X Ron Zhu; George Ciangaru; Kazumichi Suzuki; Michael T Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Adjustment of the lateral and longitudinal size of scanned proton beam spots using a pre-absorber to optimize penumbrae and delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Uwe Titt; Dragan Mirkovic; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Luis A Perles; Wayne D Newhauser; Phillip J Taddei; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Degradation of proton depth dose distributions attributable to microstructures in lung-equivalent material.

Authors:  Uwe Titt; Martin Sell; Jan Unkelbach; Mark Bangert; Dragan Mirkovic; Uwe Oelfke; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 6.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine in proton minibeam radiotherapy in a passive scattering beamline for preclinical trials.

Authors:  Consuelo Guardiola; Ludovic De Marzi; Yolanda Prezado
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Inter-Institutional Comparison of Personalized Risk Assessments for Second Malignant Neoplasms for a 13-Year-Old Girl Receiving Proton versus Photon Craniospinal Irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Nabil Khater; Rui Zhang; Fady B Geara; Anita Mahajan; Wassim Jalbout; Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Bassem Youssef; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Phase Space Generation for Proton and Carbon Ion Beams for External Users' Applications at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center.

Authors:  Thomas Tessonnier; Tiago Marcelos; Andrea Mairani; Stephan Brons; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.