Literature DB >> 25138041

Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites.

Z Tarle1, T Attin, D Marovic, L Andermatt, M Ristic, T T Tauböck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of irradiation time on degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites in depths up to 6 mm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four bulk-fill materials (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill--TECBF; x-tra fil--XF; QuixFil--QF; SonicFill-SF) and one conventional nano-hybrid resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram--TEC) were irradiated for 10, 20, or 30 s at 1,170 mW/cm(2). DC and Knoop microhardness (KHN) were recorded after 24-h dark storage at five depths: 0.1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 mm. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni's post-hoc test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: With increasing bulk thickness, DC and KHN significantly decreased for TEC. TECBF and SF showed a significant decrease in DC and KHN at 4-mm depth after 10-s irradiation, but no decrease in DC after 30-s irradiation (p > 0.05). XF and QF demonstrated no significant DC decrease at depths up to 6 mm after irradiation of at least 20 s. At 4-mm depth, all materials tested achieved at least 80 % of their maximum DC value, irrespective of irradiation time. However, at the same depth (4 mm), only XF and QF irradiated for 30 s achieved at least 80 % of their maximum KHN value.
CONCLUSIONS: Regarding DC, the tested bulk-fill resin composites can be safely used up to at least 4-mm incremental thickness. However, with respect to hardness, only XF and QF achieved acceptable results at 4-mm depth with 30 s of irradiation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Minimum irradiation times stated by the manufacturers cannot be recommended for placement of high-viscosity bulk-fill materials in 4-mm increments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25138041     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1302-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  66 in total

1.  The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations.

Authors:  J Manhart; H Y Chen; R Hickel
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites.

Authors:  Pascal Czasch; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The effect of the photopolymerization method on the quality of composite resin samples.

Authors:  Z Tarle; A Meniga; M Ristic; J Sutalo; G Pichler; C L Davidson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite.

Authors:  Matthias J Roggendorf; Norbert Krämer; Andreas Appelt; Michael Naumann; Roland Frankenberger
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Optimizing the concentration of 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyldiphenylphosphine oxide initiator in composite resins in relation to monomer conversion.

Authors:  Vesna Miletic; Ario Santini
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins.

Authors:  J L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions.

Authors:  Murray R Bouschlicher; Frederick A Rueggeberg; Bryan M Wilson
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  Statistical estimation of resin composite polymerization sufficiency using microhardness.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Daniel L Leonard; David G Charlton; Howard W Roberts; James C Ragain
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Relationships between conversion, temperature and optical properties during composite photopolymerization.

Authors:  Benjamin Howard; Nicholas D Wilson; Sheldon M Newman; Carmem S Pfeifer; Jeffrey W Stansbury
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  34 in total

1.  Long Term Degree of Conversion of two Bulk-Fill Composites.

Authors:  Matej Par; Matea Lapas-Barisic; Ozren Gamulin; Vlatko Panduric; Nika Spanovic; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2016-12

2.  Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques.

Authors:  Vania Stephanie Sánchez Gamarra; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Júnior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  The effects of extended curing time and radiant energy on microhardness and temperature rise of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Matej Par; Igor Repusic; Hrvoje Skenderovic; Ognjen Milat; Jelena Spajic; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Different depth-related polymerization kinetics of dual-cure, bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Hang Liu; Yong Wang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  [Factors influencing clinical application of bulk-fill composite resin].

Authors:  Jing Xue
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

6.  Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Vesna Miletic; Pong Pongprueksa; Jan De Munck; Neil R Brooks; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  New Experimental Zirconia-Reinforced Rice Husk Nanohybrid Composite and the Outcome of Its Surface Roughness and Microhardness in Comparison with Commercialized Nanofilled and Microhybrid Composite Resins.

Authors:  Galvin Sim Siang Lin; Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani; Noor Huda Ismail; Kiran Singbal; Tahir Yusuf Noorani; Noraida Mamat
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-03-20

8.  Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study.

Authors:  Mirosław Orłowski; Bożena Tarczydło; Renata Chałas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-03-22

9.  Degree of Conversion and BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA Elution from Flowable Bulk Fill Composites.

Authors:  Edina Lempel; Zsuzsanna Czibulya; Bálint Kovács; József Szalma; Ákos Tóth; Sándor Kunsági-Máté; Zoltán Varga; Katalin Böddi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The Influence of Irradiation Time and Layer Thickness on Elution of Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate from SDR® Bulk-Fill Composite.

Authors:  Ryta Łagocka; Katarzyna Jakubowska; Dariusz Chlubek; Jadwiga Buczkowska-Radlińska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.