Literature DB >> 21194743

Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.

Nicoleta Ilie1, Reinhard Hickel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Monomer development for a reduced shrinkage of composite materials still challenges the modern research. The purpose of this study was to analyse the shrinkage behavior of an innovative composite material for dental restorations based on a resin system that is claimed to control polymerization kinetics having incorporated a photoactive group within the resin.
METHODS: Shrinkage stress development within the first 300s after photoinitiation, gel point as well as micro-mechanical properties (Vickers hardness HV, modulus of elasticity E, creep Cr and elastic-plastic indentation work W(e)/W(tot)) were evaluated (n = 10). The experimental flowable resin-based composite (RBC) was measured in comparison to regular methacrylate-based micro- (Esthet X Flow) and nano-hybrid flowable RBCs (Filtek Supreme Plus Flow). Additionally, the high viscosity counterparts of the two regular flowable methacryate-based composites (Esthet X Plus and Filtek Supreme Plus) as well as a low shrinkage silorane-based micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Silorane) were considered. The curing time was 20s (LED unit Freelight2, 3M-ESPE, 1226 mW/cm(2)).
RESULTS: The experimental material achieved the significantly lowest contraction stress (1.1 ± .01 MPa) followed by the silorane-based composite (3.6 ± .03 MPa), whereas the highest stress values were induced in the regular methacrylate-based flowable composites EsthetX Flow (5.3 ± .3 MPa) and Filtek Supreme Flow (6.5 ± .3 MPa). In view of gel point, the best values were obtained for the experimental flowable composite (3.1 ± .1s) and Filtek Silorane (3.2 ± .3s), which did not differ significant from each others, whereas EsthetX Plus and Filtek Supreme Plus did also not differ significantly, inducing the shortest gel point. The experimental flowable material achieved also the lowest shrinkage-rate (maximum at 0.1 MPa/s). For all analysed materials, no significant difference in the micro-mechanical properties between top and bottom were found when measured on 2mm thick increments 24h after polymerization. The categories of flowable materials performed in the measured micro-mechanical properties significantly inferior when compared to the hybrid-composites, showing lower HV and E and predominantly higher creep and plastic deformation. Within the flowable RBCs, the experimental material achieved the lowest Vickers hardness, the highest modulus of elasticity, the highest creep and showed the significantly lowest elastic deformation. SIGNIFICANCE: The experimental flowable composite revealed the lowest shrinkage stress and shrinkage-rate values in comparison to regular methacrylate composites but intermediate micro-mechanical properties. Being at the same time more rigid (higher modulus of elasticity) and more plastic (low W(e)/W(tot) and high creep values) as the regular flowable materials, its effect on interfacial stress build-up cannot be easily predicted.
Copyright © 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21194743     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  59 in total

1.  Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Adam Rencz; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites.

Authors:  Pascal Czasch; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of increment thickness on light transmission, degree of conversion and micro hardness of bulk fill composites.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Pekka Vallittu; Akikazu Shinya; Lippo Lassila
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Katharina Stark
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Long Term Degree of Conversion of two Bulk-Fill Composites.

Authors:  Matej Par; Matea Lapas-Barisic; Ozren Gamulin; Vlatko Panduric; Nika Spanovic; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2016-12

6.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite.

Authors:  Almira Isufi; Gianluca Plotino; Nicola Maria Grande; Pietro Ioppolo; Luca Testarelli; Rossella Bedini; Dina Al-Sudani; Gianluca Gambarini
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-07-19

7.  Effect of different composite modulation protocols on the conversion and polymerization stress profile of bulk-filled resin restorations.

Authors:  M C G Erhardt; M Goulart; R C Jacques; J A Rodrigues; C S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Cure and Degree of Conversion of Two Bulk Fill Flowable Composites.

Authors:  Ca Anand Yokesh; P Hemalatha; M Muthalagu; M Robert Justin
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Effect of composite type and placement technique on cuspal strain.

Authors:  Vilhelm G Ólafsson; André V Ritter; Edward J Swift; Lee W Boushell; Ching-Chang Ko; Gabrielle R Jackson; Sumitha N Ahmed; Terence E Donovan
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.843

10.  Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Z Tarle; T Attin; D Marovic; L Andermatt; M Ristic; T T Tauböck
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.