Literature DB >> 9687116

The effect of the photopolymerization method on the quality of composite resin samples.

Z Tarle1, A Meniga, M Ristic, J Sutalo, G Pichler, C L Davidson.   

Abstract

An optimal degree of conversion and minimal polymerization shrinkage are generally antagonistic goals, as increased monomer conversion invariably leads to elevated polymerization shrinkage values. However, both parameters are indispensable for an optimal resin composite restoration. A number of approaches have been used to reduce the stress on the restoration cavity wall interface, such as dentine bonding agents to counteract polymerization shrinkage, stress-absorbing lining materials and low-intensity curing lights to control the flow capacity of the material during polymerization. However, the configuration of the cavity and cohesive fractures of the material and surrounding tooth tissues are still a problem in day-to-day clinical practice. A new photopolymerization light source, pulsed laser, ensures a higher degree of conversion and lower polymerization shrinkage, and differentiates this technique from standard polymerization methods and continuous-wave argon laser polymerization. The coherence and monochromacity of pulsed laser light set at 468 nm and the far greater intensity of laser nanopulses produce a saturation effect in the depths of the composite, thus resulting in higher monomer conversion. The total amount of energy illuminating the sample surface, which is only one-fifth of that of conventional methods, and the cooling and relaxation of the material between nanopulses may be responsible for the reduced net polymerization shrinkage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9687116     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00258.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  Influence of irradiation time on subsurface degree of conversion and microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Z Tarle; T Attin; D Marovic; L Andermatt; M Ristic; T T Tauböck
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental composite, photo-activated using different methods.

Authors:  Mithra N Hegde; Priyadarshini Hegde; Babita Malhan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-04

3.  Evaluation of an injectable, photopolymerizable three-dimensional scaffold based on D: ,L: -lactide and epsilon-caprolactone in a tibial goat model.

Authors:  Geert Vertenten; Lieven Vlaminck; Tomasz Gorski; Elke Schreurs; Wim Van Den Broeck; Luc Duchateau; Etienne Schacht; Frank Gasthuys
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Micro-hardness evaluation of a micro-hybrid composite resin light cured with halogen light, light-emitting diode and argon ion laser.

Authors:  Katia M Rode; Patricia M de Freitas; Patricia R Lloret; Lynn G Powell; Miriam L Turbino
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Temperature changes under demineralized dentin during polymerization of three resin-based restorative materials using QTH and LED units.

Authors:  Sayed-Mostafa Mousavinasab; Maryam Khoroushi; Mohammadreza Moharreri; Mohammad Atai
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-05-13

6.  Influence of light curing and sample thickness on microhardness of a composite resin.

Authors:  Flávio Hb Aguiar; Kelly Rm Andrade; Débora An Leite Lima; Gláucia Mb Ambrosano; José R Lovadino
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-05-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.