Literature DB >> 22411261

In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites.

Pascal Czasch1, Nicoleta Ilie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to measure and compare degree of conversion (DC) as well as micro- (indentation modulus, E; Vickers hardness, HV) and macromechanical properties (flexural strength, σ; flexural modulus, E (flexural)) of two recently launched bulk fill resin-based composites (RBCs): Surefil® SDR™ flow (SF) and Venus® bulk fill (VB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: DC (n = 6) was investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in clinical relevant filling depths (0.1, 2, and 4 mm; 6 mm bulk, 6 mm incremental) and irradiation times (10, 20, 40 s). Micro- (n = 6) and macromechanical (n = 20) properties were measured by an automatic microhardness indenter and a three-point bending test device after storing the specimens in distilled water for 24 h at 37°C. Furthermore, on the 6-mm bulk samples, the depth of cure was determined. A field emission scanning electron microscope was used to assess filler size. Results were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's honest significance test post hoc test, a multivariate analysis (α = 0.05) and an independent t test. Weibull analysis was used to assess σ.
RESULTS: VB showed, in all depth, significant higher DC (VB, 62.4-67.4 %; SF, 57.1-61.9 %), but significant lower macro- (VB, E (flexural) = 3.6 GPa; σ = 122.7 MPa; SF, E (flexural) = 5.0 GPa; σ = 131.8 MPa) and micromechanical properties (VB, E = 7.3-8.8 GPa, HV = 40.7-46.5 N/mm²; SF, E = 10.6-12.2 GPa, HV = 55.1-61.1 N/mm²). Both RBCs showed high reliability (VB, m = 21.6; SF, m = 26.7) and a depth of cure of at least 6 mm at all polymerization times. The factor "RBC" showed the strongest influence on the measured properties (η (2) = 0.35-0.80) followed by "measuring depth" (η (2) = 0.10-0.46) and "polymerization time" (η (2) = 0.03-0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences between both RBCs were found for DC, E, σ, and E (flexural) at all irradiation times and measuring depths. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Curing the RBCs in 4-mm bulks for 20 s can be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22411261     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  39 in total

1.  Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins.

Authors:  H Y Chen; J Manhart; R Hickel; K H Kunzelmann
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces.

Authors:  M G BUONOCORE
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites.

Authors:  Afrodite Kakaboura; Christos Rahiotis; David Watts; Nick Silikas; George Eliades
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Do dental composites always shrink toward the light?

Authors:  A Versluis; D Tantbirojn; W H Douglas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Visible-light curing units: correlation between depth of cure and distance between exit window and resin surface.

Authors:  E K Hansen; E Asmussen
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 6.  A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief.

Authors:  R M Carvalho; J C Pereira; M Yoshiyama; D H Pashley
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

7.  Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites.

Authors:  Y Li; M L Swartz; R W Phillips; B K Moore; T A Roberts
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites.

Authors:  Essam S Shawkat; Adrian C Shortall; Owen Addison; William M Palin
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites.

Authors:  Amel Amirouche-Korichi; Mohamed Mouzali; David C Watts
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  66 in total

1.  Effect of mold type, diameter, and uncured composite removal method on depth of cure.

Authors:  Richard B Price; Frederick A Rueggeberg; Jessie Harlow; Braden Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of increment thickness on light transmission, degree of conversion and micro hardness of bulk fill composites.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Pekka Vallittu; Akikazu Shinya; Lippo Lassila
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Polymerization kinetic calculations in dental composites: a method comparison analysis.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Jürgen Durner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Katharina Stark
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Gabriela D Canali; Sergio A Ignácio; Rodrigo N Rached; Evelise M Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites.

Authors:  Stefan Bucuta; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Emel Karaman; Busra Keskin; Ugur Inan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Different depth-related polymerization kinetics of dual-cure, bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Hang Liu; Yong Wang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Frank Engelhardt; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.