OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Voice rest is frequently recommended following surgical disruption of vocal fold epithelium, but patients report variable adherence to voice rest recommendations. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of an ambulatory vocal dosimeter for measuring adherence to voice rest recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes research. METHODS: Part 1: To determine the utility of the dosimeter in nonclinical use, the relationship between self-reported voice use and dosimeter measurements was examined in normal subjects (n = 11) who prospectively logged voice use while wearing the dosimeter. Part 2: To determine clinical utility of the dosimeter, patients undergoing vocal fold surgery for which postoperative voice rest was recommended (n = 11) wore a dosimeter for 2 days prior to and 2 days after surgery. Phonation percent and sound level were compared at baseline and during voice rest. RESULTS: The dosimeter performed as hypothesized with both normal subjects and patients. A moderate correlation (r = 0.62) was noted between self-reported voice use and dosimeter measurements in normal subjects. In patients on voice rest, a statistically and clinically significant decrease was observed in measured voice use, both in phonation time (P = .002) and intensity of phonation (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory vocal dosimetry may have clinical utility for assessing adherence to voice rest recommendations. This information will be useful for the design of future studies on voice rest.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Voice rest is frequently recommended following surgical disruption of vocal fold epithelium, but patients report variable adherence to voice rest recommendations. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of an ambulatory vocal dosimeter for measuring adherence to voice rest recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes research. METHODS: Part 1: To determine the utility of the dosimeter in nonclinical use, the relationship between self-reported voice use and dosimeter measurements was examined in normal subjects (n = 11) who prospectively logged voice use while wearing the dosimeter. Part 2: To determine clinical utility of the dosimeter, patients undergoing vocal fold surgery for which postoperative voice rest was recommended (n = 11) wore a dosimeter for 2 days prior to and 2 days after surgery. Phonation percent and sound level were compared at baseline and during voice rest. RESULTS: The dosimeter performed as hypothesized with both normal subjects and patients. A moderate correlation (r = 0.62) was noted between self-reported voice use and dosimeter measurements in normal subjects. In patients on voice rest, a statistically and clinically significant decrease was observed in measured voice use, both in phonation time (P = .002) and intensity of phonation (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory vocal dosimetry may have clinical utility for assessing adherence to voice rest recommendations. This information will be useful for the design of future studies on voice rest.
Authors: Bernard Rousseau; Seth M Cohen; Amy S Zeller; Leda Scearce; Andrew G Tritter; C Gaelyn Garrett Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Marijke Dieltjens; Marc J Braem; Anneclaire V M T Vroegop; Kristien Wouters; Johan A Verbraecken; Wilfried A De Backer; Paul H Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken Journal: Chest Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: A Nacci; B Fattori; V Mancini; E Panicucci; F Ursino; F M Cartaino; S Berrettini Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: Daryush D Mehta; Harold A Cheyne; Asa Wehner; James T Heaton; Robert E Hillman Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.408