Literature DB >> 34520225

Role of Voice Therapy in Adherence to Voice Rest After Office-Based Vocal Fold Procedures.

Renee E King1,2, Seth H Dailey1, Susan L Thibeault1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose Patients undergoing vocal fold procedures significantly reduce but often do not cease voice use during absolute postprocedure voice rest. We hypothesized that patients who completed preprocedure voice therapy would increase adherence to postprocedure voice rest. Method Eighty-six participants completed this prospective cohort study. Patients scheduled for office-based vocal fold procedures, 1-3 days of absolute postprocedure voice rest, and preprocedure speech-language pathology (SLP) care were recruited. SLP care consisted of either (a) multiple voice therapy sessions, (b) one counseling/therapy session, or (c) voice evaluation only. Participants reported talking and other specific voice behaviors on 100-mm visual analog scales for up to 3 days pre- and postprocedure as well as changes in overall voice use at follow-up at least 1 week postprocedure. Results Talking decreased postprocedure by 63% in the therapy group and 65% in the counseling group, both significantly more than the 35% decrease measured in the evaluation group. There were group differences in talking at baseline but not during voice rest. Coughing and throat clearing were highest in the voice evaluation group and decreased less than talking during voice rest. At follow-up, 84% of participants reported that they completed voice rest for at least as long as recommended and 39.5% reported that they never used their voices during voice rest. Participants estimated a 98% overall reduction in voice use during voice rest at follow-up. Conclusions Voice use before and after vocal fold procedures varies by participation in preprocedure voice therapy. Patients significantly decrease talking during postprocedure voice rest but are not perfectly adherent. Communicative voice use decreases more than noncommunicative voice use during voice rest. Patients may overestimate adherence to voice rest at follow-up. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16589864.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34520225      PMCID: PMC9132023          DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   4.018


  29 in total

1.  Compliance and quality of life in patients on prescribed voice rest.

Authors:  Bernard Rousseau; Seth M Cohen; Amy S Zeller; Leda Scearce; Andrew G Tritter; C Gaelyn Garrett
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Voice rest after laryngeal surgery: what's the evidence?

Authors:  Mami Kaneko; Shigeru Hirano
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index and voice measurements in four groups of patients with dysphonia.

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Francesco Mozzanica; Miriam Vedrody; Patrizia Maruzzi; Francesco Ottaviani
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Voice Outcomes following a Single Office-Based Steroid Injection for Vocal Fold Scar.

Authors:  William G Young; Matthew R Hoffman; Ian J Koszewski; Chad W Whited; Brienne N Ruel; Seth H Dailey
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Timing of Voice Therapy: A Primary Investigation of Voice Outcomes for Surgical Benign Vocal Fold Lesion Patients.

Authors:  Sharon S Tang; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  A retrospective study concerning the psychosocial impact of voice disorders: Voice Handicap Index change in patients with benign voice disorders after treatment (measured with the Dutch version of the VHI).

Authors:  Frans Bouwers; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Role of voice rest following laser resection of vocal fold lesions: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandeep S Dhaliwal; Philip C Doyle; Sebastiano Failla; Sarah Hawkins; Kevin Fung
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Health beliefs, disease severity, and patient adherence: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Robin DiMatteo; Kelly B Haskard; Summer L Williams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Using Ambulatory Voice Monitoring to Investigate Common Voice Disorders: Research Update.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Jarrad H Van Stan; Matías Zañartu; Marzyeh Ghassemi; John V Guttag; Víctor M Espinoza; Juan P Cortés; Harold A Cheyne; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.