Literature DB >> 27788279

Accuracy of Self-Reported Estimates of Daily Voice Use in Adults With Normal and Disordered Voices.

Daryush D Mehta1, Harold A Cheyne2, Asa Wehner3, James T Heaton1, Robert E Hillman1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate estimation of daily patterns of vocal behavior is essential to understanding the role of voice use in voice disorders. Given that clinicians currently rely on patient self-report to assess daily vocal behaviors, this study sought to assess the accuracy with which adults with and without voice disorders can estimate their amount of daily voice use in terms of phonation time. Method: Eighteen subjects (6 patients, 6 matched members of a control group without voice disorders, 6 low voice users) wore the accelerometer-based Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM; model 3200, KayPENTAX, Montvale, NJ) for at least 5 workdays. Subjects were instructed to provide hourly self-reports of time spent talking using a visual analog scale. Spearman correlation coefficients and errors between self-reported and APM-based estimates of phonation time revealed subject- and group-specific characteristics.
Results: A majority of subjects exhibited a significant bias toward overestimating their phonation times, with an average absolute error of 113%. Correlation coefficients between self-reported and APM-based estimates of phonation time ranged from statistically nonsignificant to .91, reflecting large intersubject variability. Conclusions: Subjects in all 3 groups were moderately accurate at estimating their hourly voice use, with a consistent bias toward overestimation. The results support the potential role that ambulatory monitoring could play in improving the clinical assessment of voice disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27788279      PMCID: PMC5373697          DOI: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  29 in total

1.  A voice accumulator device: evaluation based on studio and field recordings.

Authors:  A Szabo; B Hammarberg; A Håkansson; M Södersten
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.487

2.  Adaptation of a Pocket PC for use as a wearable voice dosimeter.

Authors:  Peter S Popolo; Jan G Svec; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Voicing and silence periods in daily and weekly vocalizations of teachers.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Eric J Hunter; Jan G Svec
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Air-borne and tissue-borne sensitivities of bioacoustic sensors used on the skin surface.

Authors:  Matías Zañartu; Julio C Ho; Steve S Kraman; Hans Pasterkamp; Jessica E Huber; George R Wodicka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

Authors:  Gail B Kempster; Bruce R Gerratt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).

Authors:  N D Hogikyan; G Sethuraman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  A newly designed automatic phonometer.

Authors:  H Watanabe; S Komiyama; S Ryu; S Kannae
Journal:  Agressologie       Date:  1984-10

8.  The clinical utility of vocal dosimetry for assessing voice rest.

Authors:  Stephanie Misono; Kathryn Banks; Philippe Gaillard; George S Goding; Bevan Yueh
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Anca M Barbu; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Analysis of vocal abuse: fluctuations in phonation time and intensity in 4 groups of speakers.

Authors:  T Masuda; Y Ikeda; H Manako; S Komiyama
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  4 in total

1.  Automatic speech and singing classification in ambulatory recordings for normal and disordered voices.

Authors:  Andrew J Ortiz; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Silvia Capobianco; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman; Jarrad H Van Stan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Role of Voice Therapy in Adherence to Voice Rest After Office-Based Vocal Fold Procedures.

Authors:  Renee E King; Seth H Dailey; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Self-Ratings of Vocal Status in Daily Life: Reliability and Validity for Patients With Vocal Hyperfunction and a Normative Group.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Marc Maffei; Maria Lúcia Vaz Masson; Daryush D Mehta; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Amount and Characteristics of Speaking and Singing Voice Use in Vocally Healthy Female College Student Singers During a Typical Week.

Authors:  Laura E Toles; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; Daryush D Mehta; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.