| Literature DB >> 23620641 |
A Nacci1, B Fattori, V Mancini, E Panicucci, F Ursino, F M Cartaino, S Berrettini.
Abstract
Vocal load plays a significant role in the aetiology of voice disorders and influences the response to treatment. For this reason, many researchers have focused their attention on how a voice is used, especially when vocal load is increased, during working hours for instance. The majority of studies in this regard have been performed by recording vocal parameters for brief periods with the aid of microphones. The first devices produced recorded only a few parameters and for relatively short periods of time, and since microphones were used there was a problem with both privacy and background noise such as the inclusion of voices from nearby people. Recently, microprocessors that can monitor a voice for an entire day have been developed; these use miniaturised accelerometers as vocal sensors. The latest commerciallyavailable version is the Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM) (KayPENTAX, Lincoln Park, NJ, USA) which can record several vocal parameters for over 18 hours and supply a series of graphic representations of the variations in these parameters during the recording period. In particular, the APM permits recording vocal load by measuring the cycle dose and distance dose, and evaluates vocal intensity (dB sound pressure level [SPL]), fundamental frequency and total phonation time. This report describes the APM, the use of an accelerometer as a vocal sensor, the importance of its calibration and the parameters it records. In particular, details are given on phonation time, variations in frequency, vocal intensity, phonation density and vocal dose. The role of the APM in voice studies is also described, in addition to its potential clinical applications as demonstrated by the few reports available in the literature. We also discuss our experience with the device in groups of euphonic and dysphonic elementary school teachers.Entities:
Keywords: APM; Ambulatory Phonation Monitor; Parameters of voice; Total phonation time; Vocal doses; Vocal load
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23620641 PMCID: PMC3631805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ISSN: 0392-100X Impact factor: 2.124
Fig. 1.Phonation Time Profile Graph. Phonation time profile of an entire recording period (10:03 a.m. - 10:03 p.m.) (A) and of selected subintervals of time (2:30-4:00 p.m.) during the same exam (B).
Fig. 2.Phonation Density Graph. Normophonic subject: the area is circumscribed (limited F0 and SPL values (coupled), keeping the manner of voice usage constant) (A). Patient with dysfunctional dysphonia: there are widespread areas of high density (the subject has used extremely variable F0 and SPL values during the recording period) (B).
Fig. 3.Sound Pressure Level and Fundamental Frequency Histogram. The highest SPL or F0 column in the graph corresponds to values of vocal intensity and the fundamental frequency used most during the recording period. Normophonic subject: only two columns are similar in height (limited F0 and SPL values keeping the manner of voice usage constant) (A, B). Patient with dysfunctional dysphonia: several columns of similar height in the graph indicate that the subject has used different vocal intensities and fundamental frequencies in the period shown (C, D).
Fig. 4.Fundamental Frequency/SPL Density Scatter Plots. These graphs show the distribution of F0 and SPL, respectively, over time (line). The graphs also show the frequency density and the sound pressure level density, coloured in grey and superimposed over the mean values that can be seen in the tracing. Normophonic subject: F0 and SPL do not vary significantly over time of recording (A, B). Patient with dysfunctional dysphonia: a progressive increase in F0 and a progressive contemporary decrease in SPL (C, D) is apparent.
Variation of F0 mode, F0 average and Sound Pressure Level (mean ± SD) during a five-hour working day in healthy teachers and in teachers with vocal nodules.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| F0 Mode | 217.1 ± 4.8 | 217.2 ± 4.3 | 218.7 ± 4.1 | 225.2 ± 1.9 | 227.1 ± 2.1 |
| F0 Average | 220.2 ± 1.4 | 220.9 ± 1.3 | 222.4 ± 1.9 | 227.0 ± 3.1 | 228.8 ± 2.5 |
| SPL | 75.4 ± 2.6 | 75.9 ± 1.9 | 76.8 ± 2,0 | 80.9 ± 2.0 | 82.7 ± 1.6 |
|
| |||||
| F0 Mode | 218.3 ± 4.7 | 217.6 ± 4.6 | 216.2 ± 5.7 | 214.2 ± 5.7 | 205.9 ± 5.4 |
| F0 Average | 220.9 ± 6.3 | 219.2 ± 4.8 | 217.7 ± 5.4 | 215.6 ± 5.2 | 207.3 ± 6.1 |
| SPL | 73.3 ± 2.6 | 72.1 ± 2.2 | 71.3 ± 2.2 | 69.4 ± 2.4 | 65.7 ± 1.2 |
Fourth hour versus First, Second, Third hour: p < 0.02;
Fifth hour versus First, Second, Third hour: p < 0.01;
Fifth hour versus First, Second, Third, Fourth hour: p < 0.05;
Fifth hour versus First, Second, Third, Fourth hour: p = 0.01.