Ellika Schalling1, Joakim Gustafsson, Sten Ternström, Frida Bulukin Wilén, Maria Södersten. 1. Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: ellika.schalling@ki.se.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of biofeedback on voice sound level (SL) in subjects with reduced voice SL, secondary to Parkinson disease (PD), using a portable voice accumulator. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective intervention study. METHODS: Voice SL, phonation time, and level of background noise were registered with a portable voice accumulator during three consecutive registration periods. Six subjects with reduced voice SL secondary to PD participated. Biofeedback, in the form of a vibration signal when voice SL went below an individually set threshold level, was administered during the second registration period only. Mean voice SL was calculated for registration periods with and without feedback. Data on phonation time and level of background noise was also collected. Field registrations with the portable voice accumulator were also compared with registrations made in a recording studio. In addition, subjects were asked about subjective experiences of using the portable voice accumulator for up to 15 days. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in voice SL during the period when biofeedback of voice SL was administered. Subjects reported that using the portable voice accumulator was a positive experience. Several participants wished to continue using the device. In general, subjects handled the device independently with no major problems and did not report any negative experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was a first trial including six subjects with reduced voice SL secondary to PD, the findings indicate that biofeedback of voice SL administered via a portable voice accumulator may be a useful treatment tool for this group of patients and that further studies are needed.
OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of biofeedback on voice sound level (SL) in subjects with reduced voice SL, secondary to Parkinson disease (PD), using a portable voice accumulator. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective intervention study. METHODS: Voice SL, phonation time, and level of background noise were registered with a portable voice accumulator during three consecutive registration periods. Six subjects with reduced voice SL secondary to PD participated. Biofeedback, in the form of a vibration signal when voice SL went below an individually set threshold level, was administered during the second registration period only. Mean voice SL was calculated for registration periods with and without feedback. Data on phonation time and level of background noise was also collected. Field registrations with the portable voice accumulator were also compared with registrations made in a recording studio. In addition, subjects were asked about subjective experiences of using the portable voice accumulator for up to 15 days. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in voice SL during the period when biofeedback of voice SL was administered. Subjects reported that using the portable voice accumulator was a positive experience. Several participants wished to continue using the device. In general, subjects handled the device independently with no major problems and did not report any negative experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was a first trial including six subjects with reduced voice SL secondary to PD, the findings indicate that biofeedback of voice SL administered via a portable voice accumulator may be a useful treatment tool for this group of patients and that further studies are needed.
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Dagmar Sternad; Robert Petit; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Marc Maffei; Maria Lúcia Vaz Masson; Daryush D Mehta; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 2.408