Jeff Searl1, Angela Dietsch2. 1. Department of Hearing and Speech, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Electronic address: jsearl@kumc.edu. 2. Department of Hearing and Speech, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate capabilities and limitations of the VocaLog, a device marketed to log-calibrated dB sound pressure level (SPL). STUDY DESIGN: The study design varied depending on the experiment. All were prospective. Some were case series, and others were cohort studies without controls. METHOD: Experiments were conducted to determine (1) whether the VocaLog logged phonatory activity and silence when it should, (2) if nonphonatory activities were detected, (3) correlation of VocaLog dB values to an external sound level meter (SLM), and (4) accuracy of phonation time (PT) and speaking time (ST) estimates from the VocaLog. RESULTS: Silence and phonatory activity were logged as such nearly 100% of the time. Nonphonatory activities were sometimes detected as dB values, including coughs, throat clear, belching, and swallows. The dB values from the VocaLog were strongly correlated with dB SPL from an external SLM. When on the neck, the device rarely picked up external sounds when the external noise was between 85 and 103 dB SPL. The VocaLog gave a reasonable estimate of ST but overestimated PT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the VocaLog holds promise as means of indexing vocal loudness via calibrated dB SPL levels. However, some nonphonatory activity is also likely to be logged. The device provides a reasonable estimate of ST, but not PT.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate capabilities and limitations of the VocaLog, a device marketed to log-calibrated dB sound pressure level (SPL). STUDY DESIGN: The study design varied depending on the experiment. All were prospective. Some were case series, and others were cohort studies without controls. METHOD: Experiments were conducted to determine (1) whether the VocaLog logged phonatory activity and silence when it should, (2) if nonphonatory activities were detected, (3) correlation of VocaLog dB values to an external sound level meter (SLM), and (4) accuracy of phonation time (PT) and speaking time (ST) estimates from the VocaLog. RESULTS: Silence and phonatory activity were logged as such nearly 100% of the time. Nonphonatory activities were sometimes detected as dB values, including coughs, throat clear, belching, and swallows. The dB values from the VocaLog were strongly correlated with dB SPL from an external SLM. When on the neck, the device rarely picked up external sounds when the external noise was between 85 and 103 dB SPL. The VocaLog gave a reasonable estimate of ST but overestimated PT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the VocaLog holds promise as means of indexing vocal loudness via calibrated dB SPL levels. However, some nonphonatory activity is also likely to be logged. The device provides a reasonable estimate of ST, but not PT.
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Laura E Toles; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; James A Burns; Tiffiny Hron; Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 2.408