Literature DB >> 25129146

Joint analysis of three genome-wide association studies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese populations.

Chen Wu1, Zhaoming Wang2,3, Xin Song4,5, Xiao-Shan Feng6, Christian C Abnet2, Jie He7, Nan Hu2, Xian-Bo Zuo8, Wen Tan1, Qimin Zhan1, Zhibin Hu9, Zhonghu He10, Weihua Jia11,12, Yifeng Zhou13, Kai Yu2, Xiao-Ou Shu14,15, Jian-Min Yuan16, Wei Zheng14,15, Xue-Ke Zhao5, She-Gan Gao6, Zhi-Qing Yuan4, Fu-You Zhou17, Zong-Min Fan5, Ji-Li Cui4,5, Hong-Li Lin4,5, Xue-Na Han5, Bei Li5, Xi Chen5,18, Sanford M Dawsey2, Linda Liao2, Maxwell P Lee19, Ti Ding20, You-Lin Qiao21, Zhihua Liu1, Yu Liu5, Dianke Yu1, Jiang Chang1, Lixuan Wei1, Yu-Tang Gao22, Woon-Puay Koh23, Yong-Bing Xiang22, Ze-Zhong Tang20, Jin-Hu Fan21, Jing-Jing Han5,18, Sheng-Li Zhou5, Peng Zhang5, Dong-Yun Zhang5, Yuan Yuan5, Ying Huang1, Chunling Liu1, Kan Zhai1, Yan Qiao1, Guangfu Jin9, Chuanhai Guo10, Jianhua Fu11,12, Xiaoping Miao24, Changdong Lu17, Haijun Yang17, Chaoyu Wang2, William A Wheeler25, Mitchell Gail2, Meredith Yeager2,3, Jeff Yuenger2,3, Er-Tao Guo5, Ai-Li Li5,26, Wei Zhang5, Xue-Min Li27, Liang-Dan Sun8, Bao-Gen Ma28,29,30, Yan Li5, Sa Tang5, Xiu-Qing Peng5,6, Jing Liu5, Amy Hutchinson2,3, Kevin Jacobs2,3, Carol Giffen25, Laurie Burdette2,3, Joseph F Fraumeni2, Hongbing Shen9, Yang Ke10, Yixin Zeng11,12, Tangchun Wu24, Peter Kraft31, Charles C Chung2,3, Margaret A Tucker2, Zhi-Chao Hou5, Ya-Li Liu4,5, Yan-Long Hu4,5, Yu Liu5, Li Wang4,32, Guo Yuan4,5, Li-Sha Chen4,5, Xiao Liu5, Teng Ma5, Hui Meng5, Li Sun5, Xin-Min Li5, Xiu-Min Li4, Jian-Wei Ku5,33, Ying-Fa Zhou5,31, Liu-Qin Yang34, Zhou Wang35, Yin Li36, Qirenwang Qige37, Wen-Jun Yang38, Guang-Yan Lei39, Long-Qi Chen40, En-Min Li41,42, Ling Yuan36, Wen-Bin Yue5,43, Ran Wang5, Lu-Wen Wang5, Xue-Ping Fan5, Fang-Heng Zhu34, Wei-Xing Zhao4, Yi-Min Mao6, Mei Zhang5, Guo-Lan Xing5, Ji-Lin Li44, Min Han45, Jing-Li Ren32, Bin Liu46, Shu-Wei Ren47, Qing-Peng Kong48, Feng Li49, Ilyar Sheyhidin50,51, Wu Wei52,53, Yan-Rui Zhang28,29,30, Chang-Wei Feng32, Jin Wang5, Yu-Hua Yang54, Hong-Zhang Hao55, Qi-De Bao55, Bao-Chi Liu56, Ai-Qun Wu57, Dong Xie58, Wan-Cai Yang4, Liang Wang4,59, Xiao-Hang Zhao60, Shu-Qing Chen61, Jun-Yan Hong61,62, Xue-Jun Zhang8, Neal D Freedman2, Alisa M Goldstein2, Dongxin Lin1, Philip R Taylor2, Li-Dong Wang4,5, Stephen J Chanock2.   

Abstract

We conducted a joint (pooled) analysis of three genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in individuals of Chinese ancestry (5,337 ESCC cases and 5,787 controls) with 9,654 ESCC cases and 10,058 controls for follow-up. In a logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, study and two eigenvectors, two new loci achieved genome-wide significance, marked by rs7447927 at 5q31.2 (per-allele odds ratio (OR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-0.88; P = 7.72 × 10(-20)) and rs1642764 at 17p13.1 (per-allele OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.85-0.91; P = 3.10 × 10(-13)). rs7447927 is a synonymous SNP in TMEM173, and rs1642764 is an intronic SNP in ATP1B2, near TP53. Furthermore, a locus in the HLA class II region at 6p21.32 (rs35597309) achieved genome-wide significance in the two populations at highest risk for ESSC (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.22-1.46; P = 1.99 × 10(-10)). Our joint analysis identifies new ESCC susceptibility loci overall as well as a new locus unique to the population in the Taihang Mountain region at high risk of ESCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25129146      PMCID: PMC4212832          DOI: 10.1038/ng.3064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma are distinct diseases with different etiologies. ESCC remains the more common type of esophageal carcinoma in economically-developing countries as well as globally. Approximately half of the world's 500,000 new ESCC cases annually occur in China where the disease is a major public health problem. Three genome wide association studies (GWAS) have examined ESCC[1-3] and two subsequent analyses used combinations of the three studies[4, 5] to report as many as 12 loci associated with ESCC risk. Four additional loci have been reported based on an interaction with alcohol consumption, a known risk factor for ESCC[4]. Two of the GWAS[1, 2] drew subjects primarily from the Taihang Mountain region of Henan and Shanxi provinces where ESCC occurs at very high rates. Total mortality due to ESCC and gastric cardia cancer can exceed 20% in the highest risk communities in this region[6]. The third GWAS[3] drew subjects from a range of locations in China including a substantial collection from Beijing, where the population is comprised of people who originate from all provinces. The contribution of lifestyle risk factors for ESCC differs widely between locations in China, with alcohol consumption being a notable example. Heavy consumption of alcoholic beverages is a known cause of ESCC[7], but historically was uncommon in the high incidence regions of China[8]. Therefore, alcoholic beverages played little role in the extraordinarily high rates, leaving the high incidence largely unexplained. To discover additional novel ESCC susceptibility alleles, we conducted a joint analysis of the three original GWAS and followed promising signals in an independent set of new cases and controls. describes the subjects from the three underlying GWAS, which include additional subjects that were scanned after the first round publications plus the additional subjects used for replication of the top hits. In our joint analysis we investigated for the first time the individual GWAS data drawn from three studies in China, which consisted of 5,337 ESCC cases and 5,787 controls of Han Chinese ethnicity. The NCI GWAS used the Illumina 660W-Quad SNP microarray, the Henan GWAS used the Illumina 610-Quad SNP microarray, while the Beijing GWAS used the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 6.0 set. shows eigenvector plots from a principal components analysis (PCA) of 25,676 uncorrelated genotyped SNPs (r2 < 0.01 in our combined control set). The results show distinct clusters corresponding to different source populations. However, only the first two eigenvectors were significant in the base cancer risk model and were thus used to adjust for population stratification in the final estimates for our joint analysis. To explore untyped common variants, we assessed variants based on the imputation of 40.5 million variants using version 3 of the 1000 Genomes data as the reference for each of the three data sets before combining them as described in the ONLINE METHODS and . After filtering out SNPs with MAF < 1% or imputation information criteria (INFO) < 0.3, we advanced 7,556,215 SNPs to the association analysis. The inflation factor λ for the joint analysis is 1.01 for all SNPs, which indicates that population stratification should not be a concern. provides a quantile-quantile plot for the joint case-control comparison with all SNPs and after exclusion of SNPs within 500 Kb of loci previously reported to be associated with ESCC. provide individual quantile-quantile plots for each of the three underlying GWAS data sets. Fourteen promising SNPs based on the joint analysis (see ONLINE METHODS) were genotyped in an additional 9,654 ESCC cases and 10,058 controls divided between subjects from Henan Province and Beijing. The joint analysis identified two new genome-wide significant loci at 5q31.2 () and 17p13.1 () associated with risk of ESCC in the pooled data of individual genotypes of all three GWAS and two replication studies (). At 5q31.2, rs7447927, a synonymous SNP located in transmembrane protein 173 (TMEM173), had a combined per allele odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.82-0.88), P=7.72x10−20. At 17p13.1, rs1642764, an intronic SNP located in ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 2 polypeptide (ATP1B2), which is just telomeric to the tumor suppressor gene, TP53, had a combined per allele OR (95%CI) of 0.88 (0.85-0.91), P=3.10x10−13. No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed across the three pooled GWAS and two replication studies for either locus (). Furthermore, the associations were confirmed independently in the follow-up sets collected from both high- and low-risk populations. On further analysis, we observed an additional susceptibility locus that showed geographic differences such that the significant association was observed only in the two GWAS[1, 2] which included subjects from populations at the highest risk for ESCC. In joint analyses using all three GWAS, a SNP at 6p21.32 showed a nearly genome-wide significant association, however, statistically significant heterogeneity among studies (P=0.015) was evident when subjects from the Beijing GWAS and replication subjects were included (i.e., among the three pooled GWAS and two replication studies as shown in ). The test for heterogeneity became non-significant when the Beijing GWAS and Beijing replication subjects were excluded (). also shows that when the analyses were restricted to subjects from the high incidence regions, rs35597309, located in the HLA Class II gene region between HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQA1, had a per allele OR (95% CI) of 1.33 (1.22-1.46), P=1.99 x 10-10 (). This heterogeneity between high- and low-risk regions was also evident when data from the three separate GWAS were examined (). Further genotyping and possibly sequencing are necessary to map the susceptibility alleles across the HLA Class II region due to its complex structure defined by long-range haplotypes. Finally, our joint analysis observed a promising association with rs61271866 (P=5.18 x 10−8), an intergenic SNP at 9p21.3 that includes the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B (CDKN2B)-CDKN2A gene cluster (). Variants in this region have been associated with risk of melanoma[9], childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia[10], chronic lymphocytic leukemia[11], and glioma[12], as well as ESCC[13] in a prior study using a subset of the samples examined here. This SNP showed heterogeneity among individual studies in the GWAS () and between the joint Stage 1 and replication phase results (). The heterogeneity picture for the 9p21.3 locus is more varied as compared to the 6p21.32 HLA Class II locus, indicating that validation of this finding will require additional work. For these four SNPs (rs7447927, rs1642764, rs35597309, and rs61271866), we tested for interactions by use of alcohol () or tobacco (). Because of the substantial differences in the degree of alcohol and tobacco use by population, we did these tests separately for each of the three underlying studies. In total this constituted 24 tests and we found one that was nominally significant (rs35597309 and tobacco in the NCI GWAS, ), but the difference did not replicate in the two other studies and thus, is most likely due to chance. We further note that the number of GWAS subjects with these covariate data from Henan was limited. Here we report a new finding of an association between rs7447927, a synonymous SNP in TMEM173, and ESCC risk. TMEM173 (also known as STING) facilitates innate immune reactions to viruses and bacteria through the production of type 1 interferon[14]. The only previous GWAS hit at this locus (rs13181561) was demonstrated to be associated with the modulation of interferon-α responses to the smallpox vaccine[15] and is highly correlated (r2=0.956 in 1000 Genomes data for CHB population) with rs7447927. rs13181561 is also tagged as an expression quantitative trait locus in lymphoblastoid cells () that alters expression of genes in segment AC135457.2. This genomic region includes the sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter (SLC23A1), which is critical for vitamin C transport[16]. Interestingly, low vitamin C has been implicated in risk of ESCC[17]. The new susceptibility locus at 17p13.1 is marked by rs1642764, an intronic SNP located within the ATP1B2 gene; this variant resides in an LD block that includes the 3’ region of TP53 (). Alteration of TP53 regulation or function could be a plausible explanation for the observed association between rs1642764 and risk of ESCC. It is noteworthy that no prior cancer GWAS has reported a conclusive association with a variant in or around TP53. Recently, a candidate gene study of genotyped and imputed SNPs across TP53 reported a strong association of a SNP with a low minor allele frequency, rs78378222, with glioma risk (P=6.86 x 10−24 with a MAF=0.013 in a population of European ancestry)[18]. We also observe that TP53 is frequently inactivated in ESCC[19]. Our target SNP in this region is in LD with several other SNPs, notably rs1050541 (r2=0.575), which alters a binding site for RAD21 (). RAD21 is a key component of the cohesion complex, which binds to DNA and is essential for mitosis, homologous DNA repair, and enhancer activities and may be relevant to cancer[20]. Alternatively, this SNP falls between recombination hotspots that includes the SHBG gene, and variants bracketing this SNP are known to be associated with sex hormone binding globulin regulation and serum testosterone concentration[21]. Esophageal cancer is male predominant in low incidence populations, but this has typically been attributed to greater tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption by men compared to women. Recent studies have suggested that hormonal factors may play a role in the development of ESCC[22, 23]. In published GWAS, HLA Class II genetic variants in close proximity (<20 kb) of rs35597309 on 6p21.32 have been associated with multiple cancers including nasopharyngeal carcinoma[24], hepatocellular carcinoma[25], lung cancer in never smokers[26], and familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia[27] as well as autoimmune diseases, including Crohn's disease[28] and lupus [29]. This SNP resides between HLA-DRB1 and HLADQA1, both MHC class 2 genes that function in antigen presentation. The HLA region is large, complex, and shows unusually long-range LD that makes the interpretation of GWAS hits in this region difficult. rs35597309 is in perfect LD (r2=1.0) with 34 other SNPs within 2 MB () including two missense mutations in HLADQA1 and a host of putative protein binding sites, enhancers, and regulatory motifs. But the LD with top hits in this region from previously reported studies of cancer was low; r2<0.1 for rs2860580 (nasopharyngeal carcinoma), rs9272105 (hepatocellular carcinoma), rs2395185 (lung cancer), and rs674313 (chronic lymphocytic leukemia) in 1000 Genomes data for CHB+JPT populations. Our results provide evidence for an association between variants at 6p21.32 and risk of ESCC, although the association was restricted to the studies which examined subjects from the high incidence Taihang Mountain region. While it is plausible that our results could be due to a gene-environment interaction between HLA genotypes and an uncharacterized risk factor specific to the Taihang Mountains, it is also possible that chance could account for this finding. The result was, however, confirmed in the Henan replication set (P=0.001). We know that populations in this region suffer from very high rates of ESCC, which is likely multi-factorial and could involve immune challenges. It is also important to note that the Han Chinese population is genetically diverse and this difference in association may be due to true differences in the genomic structure of the HLA regions between subjects from the Taihang Mountains and other parts of China. But we note that the allele frequency is similar between the Henan and Beijing replication sets (). Future work should use genomic methods specifically designed to investigate the HLA region to explore these results. We also note that a region at 6p22.1 that is linked to other HLA alleles has been associated with risk of Barrett's esophagus, the precursor lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma[30]. shows the individual GWAS and joint analysis results for the 12 main effect GWAS loci reported in five previous publications[1-5]. Joint analysis of the pooled data from the three GWAS did not strengthen all previously reported loci. We observed strong associations for SNPs in loci harboring PLCE1, CASP8, RUNX1, and CHEK2, but no signal for four loci. The Beijing GWAS showed geographic differences in associations for some SNPs[3] and this variation may be attributed, in part, to differences in environmental exposures and habits, such as alcohol consumption. A previous analysis by Wu et al. [4] using partial data from two of the studies also showed substantial heterogeneity between GWAS. Of 18 hits identified in analyses of both main effects and alcohol interactions in the Beijing data, only four replicated in subjects from the Shanxi Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Genetics Study[1]. In conclusion, we present the joint analysis of the individual genotype data from three previously published GWAS in China and have established two new loci associated with risk of ESCC across all three studies, and two promising signals, the most notable, in the HLA class II region. The latter appears to be present only in subjects from the high incidence Taihang Mountain region of China. Environmental factors have previously been shown to be of varied relevance for ESCC in different Chinese populations and this may have led to differential GWAS findings. Here we find additional evidence for distinct results among these populations. Etiologic heterogeneity may play an important role in interpreting GWAS results and should be considered as GWAS are extended to understudied populations with distinct lifestyles. Lastly, further work is needed to fine-map the regions to identify the optimal alleles for laboratory studies that will provide an understanding of the basic biology underlying the ESCC susceptibility alleles and their interaction with environmental factors.

ONLINE METHODS

Subject selection and genotyping

This study pooled the individual genotype data of subjects from three independent GWAS of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Han Chinese populations, which were part of three earlier reports from the NCI[1], Henan[2], and Beijing study groups[3]. The numbers of subjects differs in some cases from those listed in the original publications because additional subjects were genotyped using the same platform subsequent to the original publications; these subjects were included in the joint analysis of the individual genotype data. For the NCI GWAS, subjects came from four prospective cohort studies and one large case-control study as reported in Abnet et al.[1] and all subjects used in replication in the original paper were subsequently genotyped using the Illumina 660W-Quad microarray. For the Henan scan, subjects were collected from many hospitals in Henan Province and a smaller ‘genetically-matched’ subset[2] (1,076 cases, 713 controls) was selected for this joint analysis. Furthermore, 299 cases and 370 controls were added who had subsequently been genotyped using the Illumina 610-Quad SNP microarray after the first publication. For the Beijing scan, subjects were collected from four different localities as previously reported in Wu et al.[4] and all subjects were included in the current study. These subjects had been genotyped using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 6.0 set. Subjects included in the replications from both Henan[2] and Beijing[3] were identified and recruited using the same approaches as for subjects included in the GWAS from each of these respective sites and as described in the initial publications from each of their GWAS. A description of the included subjects is given in .

GWAS data

The details of the analytic pre-processing for the three GWAS were included in each of the primary papers. In addition to the quality control procedures performed in the previous primary publications for all three studies, SNPs with a call rate < 95% or Hardy-Weinberg proportion test P-value < 0.000001 or minor allele frequency < 1% were further removed prior to imputation for the current analysis (). We also searched for potential duplicates or first degree relatives across all three GWAS with glu ibds module (http://code.google.com/p/glu-genetics/) using the set of 25,676 independent SNPs with pair-wise r2<0.01 estimated from the GWAS control population. A total of nine pairs of duplicates were found; all were between Henan[2] and the NIT component of the NCI scan[1], which enrolled subjects in the same high incidence area of Henan Province. As a result, we excluded nine individuals (one from each pair) from the Henan study for the joint analysis. Application of standardized QC procedures for subjects and for SNPs resulted in the exclusion of an additional small proportion of subjects such that the final numbers of subjects in the current analysis are slightly different from those reported previously.

Imputation analysis

Imputation was conducted separately for each scan using IMPUTE2 software version 2.2.2 (http://mathgen.stats.ox.ac.uk/impute/impute_v2.html) and version 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project data as the reference set. First, the genomic coordinates were lifted over from NCBI human genome build 36 to build 37 using the UCSC lift over tool (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/downloads.html). The few loci that failed to be lifted over were also excluded from the imputation. Second, the strand of the inference data was aligned with the 1000 Genomes data by simple allele state comparison or allele frequency matching for A/T and G/C SNPs. We implemented a 4-Mb sliding window to impute across the genome, resulting in 744 jobs running in parallel on the NIH BIOWULF cluster (http://biowulf.nih.gov/). A pre-phasing strategy with SHAPEIT software version 1 (http://www.shapeit.fr/) was adopted to improve the imputation performance. The phased haplotypes from SHAPEIT were fed directly into IMPUTE2. Imputed loci with INFO < 0.3 or MAF < 0.01 were excluded from further association analysis. To technically validate our imputation findings, we optimized TaqMan assays for rs7447927, rs1642764, and rs35597309. We genotyped a set of 892 samples from NCI and another set of 752 samples from Beijing. For the NCI set, the concordance rates between the imputed genotypes (using a posterior probability threshold of 0.95) and TaqMan genotypes were 99.3%, 96.5%, and 99.1%, respectively and for the Beijing set, the concordance rates between the imputed genotypes (using a posterior probability threshold of 0.95) and TaqMan genotypes were 96.7%, 90.4%, and 99.6%, respectively.

Association analysis

The imputed genotypes were merged using GTOOL software version 0.7.5 (http://www.well.ox.ac.uk/~cfreeman/software/gwas/gtool.html) and the association testing was performed using SNPTEST software version 2.2 (https://mathgen.stats.ox.ac.uk/genetics_software/snptest/snptest.html), with adjustment for age, sex, study, and the top two eigenvectors, which controls for population stratification. In the joint analysis baseline model (not including SNP effects) adjusting for age, sex, study, and all top ten eigenvectors (EVs), the top two eigenvectors were significantly associated with case status (P-value < 0.05), and were, therefore, included in the final joint analysis association models used to test SNP effects across all three studies. In a sensitivity analysis, we also conducted the association analyses in each of the three GWAS separately, followed by meta-analyses that used the fixed effect inverse variance method to combine the beta estimates and standard errors from each scan. In this second approach, we generated the set of eigenvectors based on each GWAS and identified significant eigenvectors to control for population stratification in each individual GWAS (EV1 for NCI; EV1, EV5 and EV7 for Beijing; no EV was needed for Henan). The meta-analysis () produced very similar results to our current joint analysis (), so we presented results for Stage 1 from the joint analysis as our primary analysis. The P for heterogeneity was calculated using Cochran's Q, which is distributed as a chi-square statistic with (n-1) degrees of freedom where n is the number of sets included in the meta-analysis. For exploring the gene and environment interaction with use of alcohol or tobacco, we performed stratified analyses for the four novel SNP associations and assessed the risk heterogeneity between drinkers and nondrinkers (), and between smokers and nonsmokers (). To evaluate population stratification, we examined QQ plots before and after eigenvector adjustment for the joint analysis (), for Beijing (), and for NCI (). No figure is shown for Henan as no adjustment was required. Further, we examined the association with risk for the four novel SNP associations we report here before and after eigenvector adjustment ().

Recombination hotspot inference

Likelihood ratio statistics for recombination hotspots were estimated by SequenceLDhot software based on background recombination rates inferred by PHASE v2.1 using the 1000 Genomes CHB data.

Replication genotyping and analysis

After SNPs from previously reported ESCC risk loci were excluded, the top SNPs with p values less than 1.0 x 10−5 (n=14) from our Stage 1 analysis were selected for replication testing in both Beijing and Henan (). However, when the imputation was updated with the addition of more covariate data on subjects, the new Stage 1 p-value for rs4252725 was only 1.0 x 10−4. At that point, primers for those top 14 SNPs from the initial analysis had already been designed and validated, so we proceeded to test all 14 of these SNPs. Therefore, we reported replication results for all the SNPs that we advanced to replication despite the updated analysis of our initial results and the appearance of a shift in our criterion. All SNPs genotyped in samples from the additional Beijing subjects used optimized TaqMan assays, whereas the Henan replication subjects were genotyped using Sequenom (11 SNPs) and TaqMan (three SNPs) assays. Three Sequenom assays failed genotyping and one (rs7822239) was repeated using TaqMan because it was nominally significant (P = 0.02) in the Beijing replication set. Samples with completion rates less than 80% in either replication were excluded from association analysis. Association analyses used log additive models with a trend effect and were adjusted for sex and age. Replication and Stage 1 results were combined using a fixed effect meta-analysis.

In silico bioinformatics analysis

Using 1000 Genomes CHB data, we identified all SNPs with r2>0.8, 0.8, 0.5 (because no SNPs passed the 0.8 threshold), respectively, for the lead SNP in each of the three novel regions we identified. We then used HaploReg[31] and RegulomeDB[32] to explore potential functional annotations within the ENCODE data in the genome surrounding our lead SNPs ().
Table 1

Association between SNPs at three loci and risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a joint analysis of three independent genome-wide association studies of Han Chinese subjects.

NCBI dbSNP 137 identifier (Reference Allele, Effect Allele)CytobandNearest GeneStudyControlsCasesEffect Allele Frequency in ControlsEffect Allele Frequency in CasesOR(95% CI)P-valuePheterogeneity
All China
rs7447927 (C,G)5q31.2 TMEM173 3 scan analysis (Stage 1)578653360.4600.4510.87(0.82-0.92)4.07E-06
rs7447927 (C,G)Henan Replication480244860.4890.4380.80(0.75-0.86)2.70E-11
rs7447927 (C,G)Beijing Replication507947970.4310.3970.87(0.82-0.92)2.92E-06
rs7447927 (C,G)Combined15667146190.85(0.82-0.88)7.72E-201.31E-01
rs1642764(C,T)17p13.1 ATP1B2,TP53,p53 3 scan analysis (Stage 1)578653360.4990.4560.84(0.79-0.89)3.91E-08
rs1642764(C,T)Henan Replication463446940.4840.4700.93(0.87-0.99)2.67E-02
rs1642764(C,T)Beijing Replication505447770.5200.4830.86(0.81-0.92)1.55E-06
rs1642764(C,T)Combined15474148070.88(0.85-0.91)3.10E-137.70E-02
rs35597309(G,A)6p21.32HLA class II genes3 scan analysis (Stage 1)578753360.0720.0941.32(1.18-1.47)6.17E-07
rs35597309(G,A)Henan Replication465945970.0670.0851.23(1.09-1.38)1.00E-03
rs35597309(G,A)Beijing Replication507947860.0750.0801.05(0.94-1.17)3.59E-01
rs35597309(G,A)Combined15525147191.19(1.12-1.27)1.18E-071.50E-02

Taihang mountains only
rs35597309(G,A)6p21.32HLA class II genesNCI Scan270720210.0770.1091.43(1.23-1.67)4.27E-06
rs35597309(G,A)Henan Scan108213750.0630.0931.55(1.22-1.97)3.50E-04
rs35597309(G,A)Henan Replication465945970.0670.0851.23(1.09-1.38)1.00E-03
rs35597309(G,A)Combined844879931.33(1.22-1.46)1.99E-101.22E-01

One of these new loci showed significant heterogeneity (p=0.015) among the three studies and the associations are also reported using only the two GWAS and one replication set that primarily used subjects from populations with high incidence in the Taihang Mountains of north central China.

  32 in total

1.  Variation in CDKN2A at 9p21.3 influences childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk.

Authors:  Amy L Sherborne; Fay J Hosking; Rashmi B Prasad; Rajiv Kumar; Rolf Koehler; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Elli Papaemmanuil; Claus R Bartram; Martin Stanulla; Martin Schrappe; Andreas Gast; Sara E Dobbins; Yussanne Ma; Eamonn Sheridan; Malcolm Taylor; Sally E Kinsey; Tracey Lightfoot; Eve Roman; Julie A E Irving; James M Allan; Anthony V Moorman; Christine J Harrison; Ian P Tomlinson; Sue Richards; Martin Zimmermann; Csaba Szalai; Agnes F Semsei; Daniel J Erdelyi; Maja Krajinovic; Daniel Sinnett; Jasmine Healy; Anna Gonzalez Neira; Norihiko Kawamata; Seishi Ogawa; H Phillip Koeffler; Kari Hemminki; Mel Greaves; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  HLA-Cw*1202-B*5201-DRB1*1502 haplotype increases risk for ulcerative colitis but reduces risk for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Yukinori Okada; Keiko Yamazaki; Junji Umeno; Atsushi Takahashi; Natsuhiko Kumasaka; Kyota Ashikawa; Tomomi Aoi; Masakazu Takazoe; Toshiyuki Matsui; Atsushi Hirano; Takayuki Matsumoto; Naoyuki Kamatani; Yusuke Nakamura; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Michiaki Kubo
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Prospective study of risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers in the Linxian general population trial cohort in China.

Authors:  Gina D Tran; Xiu-Di Sun; Christian C Abnet; Jin-Hu Fan; Sanford M Dawsey; Zhi-Wei Dong; Steven D Mark; You-Lin Qiao; Philip R Taylor
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Environmental causes of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Farin Kamangar; Wong-Ho Chow; Christian C Abnet; Sanford M Dawsey
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  A genome-wide association meta-analysis of circulating sex hormone-binding globulin reveals multiple Loci implicated in sex steroid hormone regulation.

Authors:  Andrea D Coviello; Robin Haring; Melissa Wellons; Dhananjay Vaidya; Terho Lehtimäki; Sarah Keildson; Kathryn L Lunetta; Chunyan He; Myriam Fornage; Vasiliki Lagou; Massimo Mangino; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Brian Chen; Joel Eriksson; Melissa Garcia; Yong Mei Liu; Annemarie Koster; Kurt Lohman; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Ann-Kristin Petersen; Jennifer Prescott; Lisette Stolk; Liesbeth Vandenput; Andrew R Wood; Wei Vivian Zhuang; Aimo Ruokonen; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Anneli Pouta; Stefania Bandinelli; Reiner Biffar; Georg Brabant; David G Cox; Yuhui Chen; Steven Cummings; Luigi Ferrucci; Marc J Gunter; Susan E Hankinson; Hannu Martikainen; Albert Hofman; Georg Homuth; Thomas Illig; John-Olov Jansson; Andrew D Johnson; David Karasik; Magnus Karlsson; Johannes Kettunen; Douglas P Kiel; Peter Kraft; Jingmin Liu; Östen Ljunggren; Mattias Lorentzon; Marcello Maggio; Marcello R P Markus; Dan Mellström; Iva Miljkovic; Daniel Mirel; Sarah Nelson; Laure Morin Papunen; Petra H M Peeters; Inga Prokopenko; Leslie Raffel; Martin Reincke; Alex P Reiner; Kathryn Rexrode; Fernando Rivadeneira; Stephen M Schwartz; David Siscovick; Nicole Soranzo; Doris Stöckl; Shelley Tworoger; André G Uitterlinden; Carla H van Gils; Ramachandran S Vasan; H-Erich Wichmann; Guangju Zhai; Shalender Bhasin; Martin Bidlingmaier; Stephen J Chanock; Immaculata De Vivo; Tamara B Harris; David J Hunter; Mika Kähönen; Simin Liu; Pamela Ouyang; Tim D Spector; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Jorma Viikari; Henri Wallaschofski; Mark I McCarthy; Timothy M Frayling; Anna Murray; Steve Franks; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Frank H de Jong; Olli Raitakari; Alexander Teumer; Claes Ohlsson; Joanne M Murabito; John R B Perry
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  A shared susceptibility locus in PLCE1 at 10q23 for gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian C Abnet; Neal D Freedman; Nan Hu; Zhaoming Wang; Kai Yu; Xiao-Ou Shu; Jian-Min Yuan; Wei Zheng; Sanford M Dawsey; Linda M Dong; Maxwell P Lee; Ti Ding; You-Lin Qiao; Yu-Tang Gao; Woon-Puay Koh; Yong-Bing Xiang; Ze-Zhong Tang; Jin-Hu Fan; Chaoyu Wang; William Wheeler; Mitchell H Gail; Meredith Yeager; Jeff Yuenger; Amy Hutchinson; Kevin B Jacobs; Carol A Giffen; Laurie Burdett; Joseph F Fraumeni; Margaret A Tucker; Wong-Ho Chow; Alisa M Goldstein; Stephen J Chanock; Philip R Taylor
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants.

Authors:  Lucas D Ward; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Common variants at the MHC locus and at chromosome 16q24.1 predispose to Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Zhan Su; Laura J Gay; Amy Strange; Claire Palles; Gavin Band; David C Whiteman; Francesco Lescai; Cordelia Langford; Manoj Nanji; Sarah Edkins; Anouk van der Winkel; David Levine; Peter Sasieni; Céline Bellenguez; Kimberley Howarth; Colin Freeman; Nigel Trudgill; Art T Tucker; Matti Pirinen; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Luc J W van der Laan; Ernst J Kuipers; Joost P H Drenth; Wilbert H Peters; John V Reynolds; Dermot P Kelleher; Ross McManus; Heike Grabsch; Hans Prenen; Raf Bisschops; Kausila Krishnadath; Peter D Siersema; Jantine W P M van Baal; Mark Middleton; Russell Petty; Richard Gillies; Nicola Burch; Pradeep Bhandari; Stuart Paterson; Cathryn Edwards; Ian Penman; Kishor Vaidya; Yeng Ang; Iain Murray; Praful Patel; Weimin Ye; Paul Mullins; Anna H Wu; Nigel C Bird; Helen Dallal; Nicholas J Shaheen; Liam J Murray; Konrad Koss; Leslie Bernstein; Yvonne Romero; Laura J Hardie; Rui Zhang; Helen Winter; Douglas A Corley; Simon Panter; Harvey A Risch; Brian J Reid; Ian Sargeant; Marilie D Gammon; Howard Smart; Anjan Dhar; Hugh McMurtry; Haythem Ali; Geoffrey Liu; Alan G Casson; Wong-Ho Chow; Matt Rutter; Ashref Tawil; Danielle Morris; Chuka Nwokolo; Peter Isaacs; Colin Rodgers; Krish Ragunath; Chris MacDonald; Chris Haigh; David Monk; Gareth Davies; Saj Wajed; David Johnston; Michael Gibbons; Sue Cullen; Nicholas Church; Ruth Langley; Michael Griffin; Derek Alderson; Panos Deloukas; Sarah E Hunt; Emma Gray; Serge Dronov; Simon C Potter; Avazeh Tashakkori-Ghanbaria; Mark Anderson; Claire Brooks; Jenefer M Blackwell; Elvira Bramon; Matthew A Brown; Juan P Casas; Aiden Corvin; Audrey Duncanson; Hugh S Markus; Christopher G Mathew; Colin N A Palmer; Robert Plomin; Anna Rautanen; Stephen J Sawcer; Richard C Trembath; Ananth C Viswanathan; Nicholas Wood; Gosia Trynka; Cisca Wijmenga; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Paul Atherfold; Anna M Nicholson; Nichola L Gellatly; Deborah Glancy; Sheldon C Cooper; David Cunningham; Tore Lind; Julie Hapeshi; David Ferry; Barrie Rathbone; Julia Brown; Sharon Love; Stephen Attwood; Stuart MacGregor; Peter Watson; Scott Sanders; Weronica Ek; Rebecca F Harrison; Paul Moayyedi; John de Caestecker; Hugh Barr; Elia Stupka; Thomas L Vaughan; Leena Peltonen; Chris C A Spencer; Ian Tomlinson; Peter Donnelly; Janusz A Z Jankowski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Low penetrance susceptibility to glioma is caused by the TP53 variant rs78378222.

Authors:  V Enciso-Mora; F J Hosking; A L Di Stefano; D Zelenika; S Shete; P Broderick; A Idbaih; J-Y Delattre; K Hoang-Xuan; Y Marie; M Labussière; A Alentorn; P Ciccarino; M Rossetto; G Armstrong; Y Liu; K Gousias; J Schramm; C Lau; S J Hepworth; M Schoemaker; K Strauch; M Müller-Nurasyid; S Schreiber; A Franke; S Moebus; L Eisele; A Swerdlow; M Simon; M Bondy; M Lathrop; M Sanson; R S Houlston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Genome-wide association study identifies multiple risk loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Sonja I Berndt; Christine F Skibola; Vijai Joseph; Nicola J Camp; Alexandra Nieters; Zhaoming Wang; Wendy Cozen; Alain Monnereau; Sophia S Wang; Rachel S Kelly; Qing Lan; Lauren R Teras; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Charles C Chung; Meredith Yeager; Angela R Brooks-Wilson; Patricia Hartge; Mark P Purdue; Brenda M Birmann; Bruce K Armstrong; Pierluigi Cocco; Yawei Zhang; Gianluca Severi; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Charles Lawrence; Laurie Burdette; Jeffrey Yuenger; Amy Hutchinson; Kevin B Jacobs; Timothy G Call; Tait D Shanafelt; Anne J Novak; Neil E Kay; Mark Liebow; Alice H Wang; Karin E Smedby; Hans-Olov Adami; Mads Melbye; Bengt Glimelius; Ellen T Chang; Martha Glenn; Karen Curtin; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Brandt Jones; W Ryan Diver; Brian K Link; George J Weiner; Lucia Conde; Paige M Bracci; Jacques Riby; Elizabeth A Holly; Martyn T Smith; Rebecca D Jackson; Lesley F Tinker; Yolanda Benavente; Nikolaus Becker; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; Lenka Foretova; Marc Maynadie; James McKay; Anthony Staines; Kari G Rabe; Sara J Achenbach; Celine M Vachon; Lynn R Goldin; Sara S Strom; Mark C Lanasa; Logan G Spector; Jose F Leis; Julie M Cunningham; J Brice Weinberg; Vicki A Morrison; Neil E Caporaso; Aaron D Norman; Martha S Linet; Anneclaire J De Roos; Lindsay M Morton; Richard K Severson; Elio Riboli; Paolo Vineis; Rudolph Kaaks; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Giovanna Masala; Elisabete Weiderpass; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Roel C H Vermeulen; Ruth C Travis; Graham G Giles; Demetrius Albanes; Jarmo Virtamo; Stephanie Weinstein; Jacqueline Clavel; Tongzhang Zheng; Theodore R Holford; Kenneth Offit; Andrew Zelenetz; Robert J Klein; John J Spinelli; Kimberly A Bertrand; Francine Laden; Edward Giovannucci; Peter Kraft; Anne Kricker; Jenny Turner; Claire M Vajdic; Maria Grazia Ennas; Giovanni M Ferri; Lucia Miligi; Liming Liang; Joshua Sampson; Simon Crouch; Ju-Hyun Park; Kari E North; Angela Cox; John A Snowden; Josh Wright; Angel Carracedo; Carlos Lopez-Otin; Silvia Bea; Itziar Salaverria; David Martin-Garcia; Elias Campo; Joseph F Fraumeni; Silvia de Sanjose; Henrik Hjalgrim; James R Cerhan; Stephen J Chanock; Nathaniel Rothman; Susan L Slager
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 41.307

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Genome-Wide Association Studies of Cancer in Diverse Populations.

Authors:  Sungshim L Park; Iona Cheng; Christopher A Haiman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Relationship between West African ancestry with lung cancer risk and survival in African Americans.

Authors:  Khadijah A Mitchell; Ebony Shah; Elise D Bowman; Adriana Zingone; Noah Nichols; Sharon R Pine; Rick A Kittles; Bríd M Ryan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  PKC iota promotes cellular proliferation by accelerated G1/S transition via interaction with CDK7 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sujie Ni; Lingling Chen; Mei Li; Weijuan Zhao; Xiaohang Shan; Miaomiao Wu; Jialin Cheng; Li Liang; Yayun Wang; Wenyan Jiang; Jianguo Zhang; Runzhou Ni
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-08-01

Review 4.  International cancer seminars: a focus on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  G Murphy; V McCormack; B Abedi-Ardekani; M Arnold; M C Camargo; N A Dar; S M Dawsey; A Etemadi; R C Fitzgerald; D E Fleischer; N D Freedman; A M Goldstein; S Gopal; M Hashemian; N Hu; P L Hyland; B Kaimila; F Kamangar; R Malekzadeh; C G Mathew; D Menya; G Mulima; M M Mwachiro; A Mwasamwaja; N Pritchett; Y-L Qiao; L F Ribeiro-Pinto; M Ricciardone; J Schüz; F Sitas; P R Taylor; K Van Loon; S-M Wang; W-Q Wei; C P Wild; C Wu; C C Abnet; S J Chanock; P Brennan
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Etiology, cancer stem cells and potential diagnostic biomarkers for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kuancan Liu; Tingting Zhao; Junkai Wang; Yunyun Chen; Rui Zhang; Xiaopeng Lan; Jianwen Que
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian C Abnet; Melina Arnold; Wen-Qiang Wei
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Epigenetic silencing of miR-203 in Kazakh patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by MassARRAY spectrometry.

Authors:  Xiaobin Cui; Xi Chen; Weiwei Wang; Aimin Chang; Lan Yang; Chunxia Liu; Hao Peng; Yutao Wei; Weihua Liang; Shugang Li; Ning Wang; Wei Liu; Jianming Hu; Wenjie Zhang; Lidong Wang; Yunzhao Chen; Feng Li
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Exome-wide analyses identify low-frequency variant in CYP26B1 and additional coding variants associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiang Chang; Rong Zhong; Jianbo Tian; Jiaoyuan Li; Kan Zhai; Juntao Ke; Jiao Lou; Wei Chen; Beibei Zhu; Na Shen; Yi Zhang; Ying Zhu; Yajie Gong; Yang Yang; Danyi Zou; Xiating Peng; Zhi Zhang; Xuemei Zhang; Kun Huang; Tangchun Wu; Chen Wu; Xiaoping Miao; Dongxin Lin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Functional characterization of a low-frequency V1937I variant in FASN associated with susceptibility to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Wang; Jianbo Tian; Qianyu Zhao; Nan Yang; Pingting Ying; Xiating Peng; Danyi Zou; Ying Zhu; Rong Zhong; Ying Gao; Jiang Chang; Xiaoping Miao
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Common genetic variants in epigenetic machinery genes and risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Howard H Yang; Han Zhang; Qi Yang; Nan Hu; Ze-Zhong Tang; Hua Su; Lemin Wang; Chaoyu Wang; Ti Ding; Jin-Hu Fan; You-Lin Qiao; William Wheeler; Carol Giffen; Laurie Burdett; Zhaoming Wang; Maxwell P Lee; Stephen J Chanock; Sanford M Dawsey; Neal D Freedman; Christian C Abnet; Alisa M Goldstein; Kai Yu; Philip R Taylor; Paula L Hyland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.