| Literature DB >> 25126846 |
Yong-Zhong Shi1, Natascha Forneris1, Om P Rajora2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are highly informative molecular markers for various biological studies in plants. In spruce (Picea) and other conifers, the development of single-copy polymorphic genomic microsatellite markers is quite difficult, owing primarily to the large genome size and predominance of repetitive DNA sequences throughout the genome. We have developed highly informative single-locus genomic microsatellite markers in black spruce (Picea mariana) and red spruce (Picea rubens) using a simple but efficient method based on a combination of AFLP and microsatellite technologies. PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25126846 PMCID: PMC4134192 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Polymorphic microsatellite markers/loci showing simple single-locus patters; and their repeat motifs, primer sequences, annealing temperatures, and GenBank accession numbers.
| Microsatellite locus | Repeat type | Primers (5′-3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) | GenBank Accession No. |
|
| (TA)9(GA)7(GATA)13 |
| 60↓54 | KJ847201 |
|
| ||||
|
| (CT)23 |
| 60 | KJ847204 |
|
| ||||
|
| (GA)20 |
| 60 | KJ847205 |
|
| ||||
|
| (CT)2(GA)6 |
| 60↓54 | KJ847206 |
|
| ||||
|
| (CT)16 |
| 60↓54 | KJ847207 |
|
| ||||
|
| (AG)8 |
| 60 | KJ847209 |
|
| ||||
|
| (GA)21 |
| 60 | KJ847211 |
|
| ||||
|
| (TC)9CC(TC)4 |
| 60↓54 | KJ847212 |
|
| ||||
|
| (GA)9 |
| 60 | KJ847213 |
|
| ||||
|
| (GA)7(AGAAT)(GA)4 |
| 60↓54 | KJ847215 |
|
| ||||
|
| (CT)12 |
| 60 | KJ847217 |
|
| ||||
|
| (CT)12 |
| 60 | KJ847219 |
|
| ||||
|
| (TC)6/(TC)14/(GA)4 |
| 58 | KJ847222 |
|
| ||||
|
| (CT)2C(CT)9 |
| 65↓60 | KJ847226 |
|
| ||||
|
| (TC)22(TA)19 |
| 55 | KJ847227 |
|
| ||||
|
| (GA)9 |
| 60↓55 | KJ847233 |
|
|
Informativeness of microsatellite markers in black spruce and red spruce.
| Microsatellite locus | Black Spruce | Red Spruce | ||||||
| Number of alleles | Allele size range | Ho | He/PIC | Number of alleles | Allele size range | Ho | He/PIC | |
|
| 1 | 206 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 170 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 9 | 105–148 | 0.133 | 0.796 | 3 | 124–146 | 0.172 | 0.161 |
|
| 17 | 165–231 | 0.267 | 0.909 | Multilocus | |||
|
| 1 | 208 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 206–210 | 0.172 | 0.587 |
|
| 12 | 141–181 | 0.433 | 0.902 | 6 | 153–161 | 0.214 | 0.692 |
|
| 4 | 164–170 | 0.400 | 0.576 | 6 | 146–200 | 0.217 | 0.617 |
|
| 16 | 227–267 | 0.900 | 0.908 | 10 | 227–267 | 0.467 | 0.779 |
|
| 3 | 185–202 | 0.100 | 0.661 | 5 | 184–206 | 0.267 | 0.639 |
|
| 15 | 182–210 | 0.690 | 0.868 | 13 | 178–210 | 0.733 | 0.851 |
|
| 7 | 192–203 | 0.900 | 0.745 | 4 | 197–209 | 0.900 | 0.663 |
|
| 14 | 204–234 | 0.867 | 0.894 | 10 | 206–226 | 0.667 | 0.818 |
|
| 8 | 137–151 | 0.467 | 0.57 | 4 | 139–145 | 0.167 | 0.541 |
|
| 8 | 220–238 | 0.167 | 0.747 | 5 | 202–232 | 0.133 | 0.769 |
|
| 2 | 119–121 | 0.067 | 0.34 | 3 | 119–123 | 0.200 | 0.636 |
|
| 18 | 168–222 | 0.367 | 0.908 | 15 | 154–216 | 0.800 | 0.847 |
|
| 15 | 176–216 | 0.667 | 0.868 | 5 | 192–208 | 0.600 | 0.662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphic information contents.
Figure 1Allelic variation at two microsatellite loci.
Allelic variation among black spruce (BS) and red spruce (RS) individuals at RPMSA11 and RPMSA17 microsatellite loci.
Inheritance of microsatellite markers in F 2 progenies of two black spruce controlled crosses.
| Primer/Locus | Cross | Parental genotypes | Number of progeny | Progeny genotypes (number) | Expected ratio | χ2 |
|
|
| 32×40 |
| 110 |
| 1∶2∶1 | 7.31 | 0.026 |
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1 | 0.13 | 0.715 | |
|
| 32×40 |
| 110 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 1.64 | 0.651 |
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 0.53 | 0.912 | |
|
| 32×40 |
| 110 |
| 1∶1 | 1.31 | 0.253 |
|
| 46×14 |
| 29 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 1.76 | 0.624 |
|
| 32×40 |
| 110 |
| 1∶1 | 1.31 | 0.253 |
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1 | 0.13 | 0.715 | |
|
| 32×40 |
| 108 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 3.04 | 0.386 |
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 1.20 | 0.753 | |
|
| 32×40 |
| 92 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 16.09 | 0.001 |
|
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1 | 0.03 | 0.853 |
|
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1 | 0.53 | 0.467 |
|
| 32×40 |
| 104 |
| 1∶1∶1∶1 | 4.23 | 0.238 |
| 46×14 |
| 30 |
| 1∶1 | 0.53 | 0.467 |
Note: Only those microsatellite loci that showed interparental polymorphisms and segregation in the progeny are included. The alleles are coded alphabetically for simplicity to follow their inheritance and segregation. O = Null allele.
Figure 2Inheritance of microsatellite DNA variants in black spruce.
Inheritance and segregation pattern of microsatellite markers at (a) RPMSA04, and (b) RPMSA11 in F 2 progeny of 46×14 controlled cross. The genotypes of the parents and progeny are provided in Table 3.
Transferability of microsatellite markers to other four spruce species: number of alleles detected in selected individuals of each species.
| Locus | Number of alleles | |||
| Norway spruce | Sitka spruce | Engelmann spruce | White spruce | |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 8 | 3 | 1 |
|
| Multilocus | Multilocus | Multilocus | Multilocus |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 3 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
|
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 6 | 9 | 9 | 7 |
|
| 10 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
|
| - | - | - | - |
|
| 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
|
| - | 1 | 5 | 4 |
Note:
*Five individuals each of P. abies, P. sitchensis, P. glauca and P. engelmannii were used to amplify the SSR locus RPMSA07, whereas eight individuals per species were used to amplify other 14 SSR loci.
- SSR locus not detected.
Comparison of development efficiency of single-locus or simple pattern microsatellite markers in Picea.
| Species | Sources | Clones screened | Positive clones | Clones sequenced | Unique sequences | SSR containing sequences | Primer pairs designed (P) | SSR loci with simple patterns (S) | Rate of loci with simple pattern (%) (P/S) | Reference |
|
| Enriched genomic DNA AFLP library | 1029 | 108 | 108 | 103 | 94 | 34 | 22 | 64.70 | This study |
|
| Enriched genomic DNA library | 2819 | 1612 | 120 | 90 | 73 | 40 | 10 | 25.00 | Roy & Rajora (unpublished) |
|
| Enriched genomic library | >200 | 20 | 7 | Dobrzeniecka et al. | |||||
|
| Non-enriched & enriched genomic library | 5404 | 91 | 32 | 23 | 16 | 8 | 50.0 | Rajora et al. | |
|
| Enriched genomic library | 200 | 60 | 56 | 34 | 13 | 38.23 | Hodgetts et al. | ||
|
| cDNA library EST sequences | 34,846 | 188 | 44 | 25 | 56.81 | Rungis et al. | |||
|
| Enriched genomic library - trinucleotide repeats | 121 | 100 | 100 | 85 | 55 | 23 | 41.82 | Scotti et al. | |
|
| Enriched genomic library – dot blot selection of low copy number sequences | 600 | 150 | 150 | 108 | 53 | 33 | 62.26 | Scotti et al. | |
|
| Genomic library | ∼65,000 | 223 | 46 | 46 | 36 | 7 | 19.44 | Pfeiffer et al. | |
|
| cDNA library | 50,000 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 37.50 | Scotti et al. |