Literature DB >> 15466426

A novel meiotic drive locus almost completely distorts segregation in mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids.

Lila Fishman1, John H Willis.   

Abstract

We report the discovery, mapping, and characterization of a meiotic drive locus (D) exhibiting nearly 100% nonrandom transmission in hybrids between two species of yellow monkeyflowers, outcrossing Mimulus guttatus and selfing M. nasutus. Only 1% of F(2) hybrids were M. nasutus homozygotes at the marker most tightly linked to D. We used a set of reciprocal backcrosses to distinguish among male-specific, female-specific, and zygote-specific sources of transmission ratio distortion. Transmission was severely distorted only when the heterozygous F(1) acted as the female parent in crosses to either parental species, ruling out pollen competition and zygote mortality as potential sources of drive. After four generations of backcrossing to M. nasutus, nearly isogenic lines were still >90% heterozygous at markers linked to D, suggesting that heterozygosity at the drive locus alone is sufficient for nonrandom transmission. A lack of dramatic female fitness costs in these lines rules out alternatives involving ovule or seed mortality and points to a truly meiotic mechanism of drive. The strength and direction of drive in this system is consistent with population genetic theory of selfish element evolution under different mating systems. These results are the first empirical demonstration of the strong female-specific drive predicted by new models of selfish centromere turnover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15466426      PMCID: PMC1448871          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  29 in total

Review 1.  Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; S J Baird; K A Gardner
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  The distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients and pairwise relatedness in a population of mimulus guttatus

Authors: 
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Transmission ratio distortion in offspring of heterozygous female carriers of Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  The role of selfish genetic elements in eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  G D Hurst; J H Werren
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  A genome-wide survey of reproductive barriers in an intraspecific hybrid.

Authors:  Y Harushima; M Nakagahra; M Yano; T Sasaki; N Kurata
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA.

Authors:  S Henikoff; K Ahmad; H S Malik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Non-Mendelian segregation of sex chromosomes in heterospecific Drosophila males.

Authors:  E T Dermitzakis; J P Masly; H M Waldrip; A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic variation in rates of nondisjunction: association of two naturally occurring polymorphisms in the chromokinesin nod with increased rates of nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M E Zwick; J L Salstrom; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome.

Authors:  E S Buckler; T L Phelps-Durr; C S Buckler; R K Dawe; J F Doebley; T P Holtsford
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  71 in total

1.  A genetic model for the female sterility barrier between Asian and African cultivated rice species.

Authors:  Andrea Garavito; Romain Guyot; Jaime Lozano; Frédérick Gavory; Sylvie Samain; Olivier Panaud; Joe Tohme; Alain Ghesquière; Mathias Lorieux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The role of meiotic drive in hybrid male sterility.

Authors:  Shannon R McDermott; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus.

Authors:  Lila Fishman; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The hitchhiking effect of an autosomal meiotic drive gene.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus.

Authors:  Christopher S Willett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Sperm should evolve to make female meiosis fair.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Review. Meiotic drive and sex determination: molecular and cytological mechanisms of sex ratio adjustment in birds.

Authors:  Joanna Rutkowska; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Cytonuclear genic incompatibilities cause increased mortality in male F2 hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N. vitripennis.

Authors:  Oliver Niehuis; Andrea K Judson; Jürgen Gadau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.