Ann Kutney-Lee1, Caitlin W Brennan2, Mark Meterko3, Mary Ersek4. 1. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: akutney@nursing.upenn.edu. 2. National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 3. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has improved the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care over the past several years. Several structural and process variables are associated with better outcomes. Little is known, however, about the relationship between the organization of nursing care and EOL outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the organization of nursing care, including the nurse work environment and nurse staffing levels, and quality of EOL care in VA acute care facilities. METHODS: Secondary analysis of linked data from the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS), electronic medical record, administrative data, and the VA Nursing Outcomes Database. The sample included 4908 veterans who died in one of 116 VA acute care facilities nationally between October 2010 and September 2011. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized estimating equations were used to examine associations between nursing and BFS outcomes. RESULTS: BFS respondents were 17% more likely to give an excellent overall rating of the quality of EOL care received by the veteran in facilities with better nurse work environments (P ≤ 0.05). The nurse work environment also was a significant predictor of providers listening to concerns and providing desired treatments. Nurse staffing was significantly associated with an excellent overall rating, alerting of the family before death, attention to personal care needs, and the provision of emotional support after the patient's death. CONCLUSION: Improvement of the nurse work environment and nurse staffing in VA acute care facilities may result in enhanced quality of care received by hospitalized veterans at the EOL.
CONTEXT: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has improved the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care over the past several years. Several structural and process variables are associated with better outcomes. Little is known, however, about the relationship between the organization of nursing care and EOL outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the organization of nursing care, including the nurse work environment and nurse staffing levels, and quality of EOL care in VA acute care facilities. METHODS: Secondary analysis of linked data from the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS), electronic medical record, administrative data, and the VA Nursing Outcomes Database. The sample included 4908 veterans who died in one of 116 VA acute care facilities nationally between October 2010 and September 2011. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized estimating equations were used to examine associations between nursing and BFS outcomes. RESULTS:BFS respondents were 17% more likely to give an excellent overall rating of the quality of EOL care received by the veteran in facilities with better nurse work environments (P ≤ 0.05). The nurse work environment also was a significant predictor of providers listening to concerns and providing desired treatments. Nurse staffing was significantly associated with an excellent overall rating, alerting of the family before death, attention to personal care needs, and the provision of emotional support after the patient's death. CONCLUSION: Improvement of the nurse work environment and nurse staffing in VA acute care facilities may result in enhanced quality of care received by hospitalized veterans at the EOL.
Authors: Hien Lu; Emily Trancik; F Amos Bailey; Christine Ritchie; Kenneth Rosenfeld; Scott Shreve; Christian Furman; Dawn Smith; Catherine Wolff; David Casarett Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ronen Rozenblum; Marianne Lisby; Peter M Hockey; Osnat Levtizion-Korach; Claudia A Salzberg; Stuart Lipsitz; David W Bates Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: David Casarett; Amy Pickard; F Amos Bailey; Christine Ritchie; Christian Furman; Ken Rosenfeld; Scott Shreve; Zhen Chen; Judy A Shea Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David Casarett; Amy Pickard; F Amos Bailey; Christine Seel Ritchie; Christian Davis Furman; Ken Rosenfeld; Scott Shreve; Judy Shea Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ann Kutney-Lee; Matthew D McHugh; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Linda Flynn; Donna Felber Neff; Linda H Aiken Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Michael A Gisondi; Dave W Lu; May Yen; Rachel Norris; D Mark Courtney; Paula Tanabe; Kirsten G Engel; Linda L Emanuel; Tammie E Quest Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2010-12
Authors: Claire A Richards; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Lynn F Reinke; Leslie L Taylor; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Rafael D Romo; Joan G Carpenter; Harleah Buck; Lisa C Lindley; Jiayun Xu; John A Owen; Suzanne S Sullivan; Marie Bakitas; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Lisa Zubkoff; Marianne Matzo Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.918
Authors: Eileen T Lake; Jordan Sanders; Rui Duan; Kathryn A Riman; Kathryn M Schoenauer; Yong Chen Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Claire A Richards; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Leslie L Taylor; Lynn F Reinke; Ann M O'Hare Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-10-02