Literature DB >> 18370895

A nationwide VA palliative care quality measure: the family assessment of treatment at the end of life.

David Casarett1, Amy Pickard, F Amos Bailey, Christine Seel Ritchie, Christian Davis Furman, Ken Rosenfeld, Scott Shreve, Judy Shea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the FATE (Family Assessment of Treatment at End of Life) Survey for use as a nationwide quality measure in the VA health care system.
DESIGN: Nationwide telephone survey.
SETTING: Five VA medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients received inpatient or outpatient care from a participating VA facility in the last month of life. One respondent/patient was selected using predefined eligibility criteria and invited to participate. MEASUREMENTS: The FATE survey consists of 32 items in 9 domains: Well-being and dignity (4 items), Information and communication (5 items), Respect for treatment preferences (2 items), Emotional and spiritual support (3 items), Management of symptoms (4 items), Choice of inpatient facility (1 item), Care around the time of death (6 items), Access to VA services (4 items), and Access to VA benefits after the patient's death (3 items).
RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 309 respondents. The FATE showed excellent psychometric characteristics, with good homogeneity (e.g., Cronbach (alpha = 0.91) and no evidence of significant ceiling effects. The FATE also demonstrated good discriminant validity. For instance, FATE scores varied across facilities (range 44-72; Kruskal Wallis test p < 0.001). Patients who were seen by a palliative care service had better scores (mean 66 versus 52; rank sum test p < 0.001), as did patients who were referred to hospice (67 versus 49; rank sum test p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The FATE survey offers an important source of quality data that can be used to improve the end-of-life care of all veterans, regardless of the type of care they receive or their site of death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18370895     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  14 in total

1.  End-of-life care among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrew G Shuman; Ye Yang; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mark E Prince
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Organization of nursing and quality of care for veterans at the end of life.

Authors:  Ann Kutney-Lee; Caitlin W Brennan; Mark Meterko; Mary Ersek
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Associations between Timing of Palliative Care Consults and Family Evaluation of Care for Veterans Who Die in a Hospice/Palliative Care Unit.

Authors:  Joan G Carpenter; Meghan McDarby; Dawn Smith; Megan Johnson; Joshua Thorpe; Mary Ersek
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Rationale and Design of the Randomized Evaluation of Default Access to Palliative Services (REDAPS) Trial.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Vanessa Madden; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Dylan S Small; Andrea Troxel; David Casarett; Mary Ersek; J Brian Cassel; Lauren Hersch Nicholas; Gabriel Escobar; Sarah H Hill; Dan O'Brien; Mark Vogel; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-09

5.  Quality of End-of-Life Care Provided to Patients With Different Serious Illnesses.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Corey Pilver; Dawn Smith; Mary Ersek; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  The Quality of End-of-Life Care among ICU versus Ward Decedents.

Authors:  Joshua A Rolnick; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Psychometric properties of instruments to measure the quality of end-of-life care and dying for long-term care residents with dementia.

Authors:  Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet; Jenny T van der Steen; Sheryl Zimmerman; Lauren W Cohen; Maartje S Klapwijk; Mirjam Bezemer; Wilco P Achterberg; Dirk L Knol; Miel W Ribbe; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Comparison of Two Methods for Implementing Comfort Care Order Sets in the Inpatient Setting: a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  F Amos Bailey; Beverly R Williams; Patricia S Goode; Richard E Kennedy; David T Redden; Elizabeth Kvale; Marie Bakitas; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 9.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the Intensive Care Unit Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Erich M Dress; Jaspal Singh; Brian A Bayes; Marzana Chowdhury; Dylan S Small; Timothy Hetherington; Lindsay Plickert; Michael E Detsky; Jason N Doctor; Michael O Harhay; Henry L Burke; Michael B Green; Toan Huynh; D Matthew Sullivan; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.