Literature DB >> 31929345

Quality of End of Life Care in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals.

Karen B Lasater1, Amelia E Schlak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether end-of-life care quality is superior in Magnet hospitals, a recognition designating nursing excellence.
BACKGROUND: Considerable research shows better patient outcomes in hospitals with excellent nurse work environments, but end-of-life care quality has not been studied in Magnet hospitals.
METHODS: An analysis of cross-sectional data was completed using surveys of nurses and hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between Magnet hospitals and measures of end-of-life care quality.
RESULTS: Overall, nurses report poor quality of end-of-life care in US hospitals. In Magnet hospitals, nurses were significantly less likely to give their hospital an unfavorable rating on end-of-life care.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital Magnet status may signal better quality in end-of-life care. Administrators looking to improve the quality of end-of-life care may consider improving aspects of nursing that distinguish Magnet hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31929345      PMCID: PMC7017389          DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Adm        ISSN: 0002-0443            Impact factor:   1.806


  21 in total

1.  How many inpatients at an acute hospital have palliative care needs? Comparing the perspectives of medical and nursing staff.

Authors:  M C Gott; S H Ahmedzai; C Wood
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  Lower mortality in Magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Matthew McHugh; Lesly A Kelly; Herbert L Smith; Evan S Wu; Jill M Vanak; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.737

3.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  The quality of dying and death: is it ready for use as an outcome measure?

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Missed nursing care: Magnet versus non-Magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Beatrice J Kalisch; Kyung Hee Lee
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Uncovering the blind spot of patient satisfaction: an international survey.

Authors:  Ronen Rozenblum; Marianne Lisby; Peter M Hockey; Osnat Levtizion-Korach; Claudia A Salzberg; Stuart Lipsitz; David W Bates
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Lesly A Kelly; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.737

8.  Lower Medicare mortality among a set of hospitals known for good nursing care.

Authors:  L H Aiken; H L Smith; E T Lake
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Magnet Hospitals: Higher Rates of Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sarah A Smith
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 10.  Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non-malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew James Billingham; Sarah-Jane Billingham
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.568

View more
  1 in total

1.  Better nurse work environments associated with fewer readmissions and shorter length of stay among adults with ischemic stroke: A cross-sectional analysis of United States hospitals.

Authors:  Heather Brom; J Margo Brooks Carthon; Douglas Sloane; Mathew McHugh; Linda Aiken
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.238

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.