OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to describe the quality of end-of-life care in US hospitals from the perspective of hospital nurses; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between the nurse practice environment and end-of-life care quality. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of multiple linked secondary data sources. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A total of 12,870 direct care registered nurses in 491 acute-care hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Measures of end-of-life care quality and nurse practice environment were derived from the 2016 RN4CAST-US survey of nurses. Nurses reported on end-of-life care quality for patients for whom death within a year would not be surprising. Nurse practice environment was measured using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a National Quality Forum validated scale. RESULTS: Most nurses gave their hospitals an unfavorable evaluation of end-of-life care overall (58%) and said patients often experience painful procedures that were unlikely to change their outcome (53%). The best predictor of poor quality was the nurse practice environment. Nurses in the best environments were 55% less likely than nurses in poor environments to rate their hospital's overall end-of-life care quality unfavorably (odds ratio = 0.45; 95% confidence interval = 0.39-0.52; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Quality of end-of-life care in US hospitals is imperfect and is significantly worse in hospitals with poor nurse practice environments than in hospitals with the best environments. This study reinforces the importance of nurses in providing high-quality end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:302-308, 2019.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to describe the quality of end-of-life care in US hospitals from the perspective of hospital nurses; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between the nurse practice environment and end-of-life care quality. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of multiple linked secondary data sources. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A total of 12,870 direct care registered nurses in 491 acute-care hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Measures of end-of-life care quality and nurse practice environment were derived from the 2016 RN4CAST-US survey of nurses. Nurses reported on end-of-life care quality for patients for whom death within a year would not be surprising. Nurse practice environment was measured using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a National Quality Forum validated scale. RESULTS: Most nurses gave their hospitals an unfavorable evaluation of end-of-life care overall (58%) and said patients often experience painful procedures that were unlikely to change their outcome (53%). The best predictor of poor quality was the nurse practice environment. Nurses in the best environments were 55% less likely than nurses in poor environments to rate their hospital's overall end-of-life care quality unfavorably (odds ratio = 0.45; 95% confidence interval = 0.39-0.52; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Quality of end-of-life care in US hospitals is imperfect and is significantly worse in hospitals with poor nurse practice environments than in hospitals with the best environments. This study reinforces the importance of nurses in providing high-quality end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:302-308, 2019.
Authors: Craig C Earle; Elyse R Park; Bonnie Lai; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Susan Block Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mary Ersek; Susan C Miller; Todd H Wagner; Joshua M Thorpe; Dawn Smith; Cari R Levy; Risha Gidwani; Katherine Faricy-Anderson; Karl A Lorenz; Bruce Kinosian; Vincent Mor Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Li-ming You; Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Ke Liu; Guo-ping He; Yan Hu; Xiao-lian Jiang; Xiao-han Li; Xiao-mei Li; Hua-ping Liu; Shao-mei Shang; Ann Kutney-Lee; Walter Sermeus Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Amber E Barnato; James E Bost; Maxwell H Farrell; Judith R Lave; Robert M Arnold; Doris M Rubio; Derek C Angus Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Karen B Lasater; Matthew McHugh; Paul R Rosenbaum; Linda H Aiken; Herbert Smith; Joseph G Reiter; Bijan A Niknam; Alexander S Hill; Lauren L Hochman; Siddharth Jain; Jeffrey H Silber Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 7.035