| Literature DB >> 25113321 |
Rina D Rudyanto1, Sjoerd Kerkstra2, Eva M van Rikxoort2, Catalin Fetita3, Pierre-Yves Brillet3, Christophe Lefevre3, Wenzhe Xue4, Xiangjun Zhu4, Jianming Liang4, Ilkay Öksüz5, Devrim Ünay5, Kamuran Kadipaşaoğlu5, Raúl San José Estépar6, James C Ross6, George R Washko6, Juan-Carlos Prieto7, Marcela Hernández Hoyos8, Maciej Orkisz7, Hans Meine9, Markus Hüllebrand9, Christina Stöcker9, Fernando Lopez Mir10, Valery Naranjo10, Eliseo Villanueva10, Marius Staring11, Changyan Xiao12, Berend C Stoel11, Anna Fabijanska13, Erik Smistad14, Anne C Elster14, Frank Lindseth14, Amir Hossein Foruzan15, Ryan Kiros16, Karteek Popuri16, Dana Cobzas16, Daniel Jimenez-Carretero17, Andres Santos17, Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo17, Michael Helmberger18, Martin Urschler19, Michael Pienn20, Dennis G H Bosboom2, Arantza Campo21, Mathias Prokop2, Pim A de Jong22, Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano23, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia23, Bram van Ginneken2.
Abstract
The VESSEL12 (VESsel SEgmentation in the Lung) challenge objectively compares the performance of different algorithms to identify vessels in thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans. Vessel segmentation is fundamental in computer aided processing of data generated by 3D imaging modalities. As manual vessel segmentation is prohibitively time consuming, any real world application requires some form of automation. Several approaches exist for automated vessel segmentation, but judging their relative merits is difficult due to a lack of standardized evaluation. We present an annotated reference dataset containing 20 CT scans and propose nine categories to perform a comprehensive evaluation of vessel segmentation algorithms from both academia and industry. Twenty algorithms participated in the VESSEL12 challenge, held at International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2012. All results have been published at the VESSEL12 website http://vessel12.grand-challenge.org. The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Our three contributions are: (1) an annotated reference dataset available online for evaluation of new algorithms; (2) a quantitative scoring system for objective comparison of algorithms; and (3) performance analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the various vessel segmentation methods in the presence of various lung diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Algorithm comparison; Challenge; Lung vessels; Segmentation; Thoracic computed tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25113321 PMCID: PMC5153359 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Image Anal ISSN: 1361-8415 Impact factor: 8.545