Literature DB >> 28018939

LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.

Samuel G Armato1, Karen Drukker1, Feng Li1, Lubomir Hadjiiski2, Georgia D Tourassi3, Roger M Engelmann1, Maryellen L Giger1, George Redmond4, Keyvan Farahani4, Justin S Kirby5, Laurence P Clarke4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to describe the LUNGx Challenge for the computerized classification of lung nodules on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans as benign or malignant and report the performance of participants' computerized methods along with that of six radiologists who participated in an observer study performing the same Challenge task on the same dataset. The Challenge provided sets of calibration and testing scans, established a performance assessment process, and created an infrastructure for case dissemination and result submission. Ten groups applied their own methods to 73 lung nodules (37 benign and 36 malignant) that were selected to achieve approximate size matching between the two cohorts. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for these methods ranged from 0.50 to 0.68; only three methods performed statistically better than random guessing. The radiologists' AUC values ranged from 0.70 to 0.85; three radiologists performed statistically better than the best-performing computer method. The LUNGx Challenge compared the performance of computerized methods in the task of differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on CT scans, placed in the context of the performance of radiologists on the same task. The continued public availability of the Challenge cases will provide a valuable resource for the medical imaging research community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  challenge; classification; computed tomography; computer-aided diagnosis; image analysis; lung nodule

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018939      PMCID: PMC5166709          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  31 in total

1.  A pattern classification approach to characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on high resolution CT: preliminary results.

Authors:  M F McNitt-Gray; E M Hart; N Wyckoff; J W Sayre; J G Goldin; D R Aberle
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Neural network ensemble-based computer-aided diagnosis for differentiation of lung nodules on CT images: clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Yan Xu; Yujing Ma; Binrong Ma
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Solid pulmonary nodule risk assessment and decision analysis: comparison of four prediction models in 285 cases.

Authors:  Simone Perandini; Gian Alberto Soardi; Massimiliano Motton; Arianna Rossi; Manuel Signorini; Stefania Montemezzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening.

Authors:  Daria Manos; Jean M Seely; Jana Taylor; Joy Borgaonkar; Heidi C Roberts; John R Mayo
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  The effect of verification on the assessment of imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Revesz; H L Kundel; M Bonitatibus
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Thomas Atwater; Sanja Antic; Qian Li; Ronald C Walker; Gary T Smith; Pierre P Massion; Matthew B Schabath; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans.

Authors:  Samuel Hawkins; Hua Wang; Ying Liu; Alberto Garcia; Olya Stringfield; Henry Krewer; Qian Li; Dmitry Cherezov; Robert A Gatenby; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldgof; Matthew B Schabath; Lawrence Hall; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  23 in total

1.  Pulmonary nodule classification in lung cancer screening with three-dimensional convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Yiting Xie; Artit Jirapatnakul; Anthony P Reeves
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-14

2.  PROSTATEx Challenges for computerized classification of prostate lesions from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Henkjan Huisman; Karen Drukker; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Justin S Kirby; Nicholas Petrick; George Redmond; Maryellen L Giger; Kenny Cha; Artem Mamonov; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-10

Review 3.  Lung cancer prediction using machine learning and advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Timor Kadir; Fergus Gleeson
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

4.  Special Section Guest Editorial: Quantitative Imaging and the Pioneering Efforts of Laurence P. Clarke.

Authors:  Robert J Nordstrom
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-09-13

Review 5.  Evolving the pulmonary nodules diagnosis from classical approaches to deep learning-aided decision support: three decades' development course and future prospect.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Wenhao Chi; Xinran Li; Peng Li; Wenhua Liang; Haiping Liu; Wei Wang; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Machine learning approach for distinguishing malignant and benign lung nodules utilizing standardized perinodular parenchymal features from CT.

Authors:  Johanna Uthoff; Matthew J Stephens; John D Newell; Eric A Hoffman; Jared Larson; Nicholas Koehn; Frank A De Stefano; Chrissy M Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Donovan Watza; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Laurie L Carr; David A Lynch; Ann G Schwartz; Jessica C Sieren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A Review on Deep Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19).

Authors:  Md Milon Islam; Fakhri Karray; Reda Alhajj; Jia Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Radiomics analysis of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT for early detection of lung cancer.

Authors:  Wookjin Choi; Jung Hun Oh; Sadegh Riyahi; Chia-Ju Liu; Feng Jiang; Wengen Chen; Charles White; Andreas Rimner; James G Mechalakos; Joseph O Deasy; Wei Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reproducible and Interpretable Spiculation Quantification for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Wookjin Choi; Saad Nadeem; Sadegh R Alam; Joseph O Deasy; Allen Tannenbaum; Wei Lu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  A comparison of the fusion model of deep learning neural networks with human observation for lung nodule detection and classification.

Authors:  Ayşegül Gürsoy Çoruh; Bülent Yenigün; Çağlar Uzun; Yusuf Kahya; Emre Utkan Büyükceran; Atilla Elhan; Kaan Orhan; Ayten Kayı Cangır
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.