Literature DB >> 21632295

Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge.

Keelin Murphy1, Bram van Ginneken, Joseph M Reinhardt, Sven Kabus, Kai Ding, Xiang Deng, Kunlin Cao, Kaifang Du, Gary E Christensen, Vincent Garcia, Tom Vercauteren, Nicholas Ayache, Olivier Commowick, Grégoire Malandain, Ben Glocker, Nikos Paragios, Nassir Navab, Vladlena Gorbunova, Jon Sporring, Marleen de Bruijne, Xiao Han, Mattias P Heinrich, Julia A Schnabel, Mark Jenkinson, Cristian Lorenz, Marc Modat, Jamie R McClelland, Sébastien Ourselin, Sascha E A Muenzing, Max A Viergever, Dante De Nigris, D Louis Collins, Tal Arbel, Marta Peroni, Rui Li, Gregory C Sharp, Alexander Schmidt-Richberg, Jan Ehrhardt, René Werner, Dirk Smeets, Dirk Loeckx, Gang Song, Nicholas Tustison, Brian Avants, James C Gee, Marius Staring, Stefan Klein, Berend C Stoel, Martin Urschler, Manuel Werlberger, Jef Vandemeulebroucke, Simon Rit, David Sarrut, Josien P W Pluim.   

Abstract

EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632295     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2158349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  123 in total

1.  Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging.

Authors:  Etsuo A Susaki; Kazuki Tainaka; Dimitri Perrin; Hiroko Yukinaga; Akihiro Kuno; Hiroki R Ueda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Tidal changes on CT and progression of ARDS.

Authors:  Maurizio Cereda; Yi Xin; Hooman Hamedani; Giacomo Bellani; Stephen Kadlecek; Justin Clapp; Luca Guerra; Natalie Meeder; Jennia Rajaei; Nicholas J Tustison; James C Gee; Brian P Kavanagh; Rahim R Rizi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  What can imaging tell us about physiology? Lung growth and regional mechanical strain.

Authors:  Connie C W Hsia; Merryn H Tawhai
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-05-10

Review 4.  Deformable medical image registration: a survey.

Authors:  Aristeidis Sotiras; Christos Davatzikos; Nikos Paragios
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A fast deformable registration method for 4D lung CT in hybrid framework.

Authors:  Wei Xia; Xin Gao
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  The VAMPIRE challenge: A multi-institutional validation study of CT ventilation imaging.

Authors:  John Kipritidis; Bilal A Tahir; Guillaume Cazoulat; Michael S Hofman; Shankar Siva; Jason Callahan; Nicholas Hardcastle; Tokihiro Yamamoto; Gary E Christensen; Joseph M Reinhardt; Noriyuki Kadoya; Taylor J Patton; Sarah E Gerard; Isabella Duarte; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Mikel Byrne; Rick Sims; Scott Ramsay; Jeremy T Booth; Enid Eslick; Fiona Hegi-Johnson; Henry C Woodruff; Rob H Ireland; Jim M Wild; Jing Cai; John E Bayouth; Kristy Brock; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Density overwrites of internal tumor volumes in intensity modulated proton therapy plans for mobile lung tumors.

Authors:  Pablo Botas; Clemens Grassberger; Gregory Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Respiratory effort correction strategies to improve the reproducibility of lung expansion measurements.

Authors:  Kaifang Du; Joseph M Reinhardt; Gary E Christensen; Kai Ding; John E Bayouth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A collaborative resource to build consensus for automated left ventricular segmentation of cardiac MR images.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Brett R Cowan; Ahmed O Al-Agamy; Mustafa A Elattar; Nicholas Ayache; Ahmed S Fahmy; Ayman M Khalifa; Pau Medrano-Gracia; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Alan H Kadish; Daniel C Lee; Ján Margeta; Simon K Warfield; Alistair A Young
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  A diffusion tensor imaging study of suicide attempters.

Authors:  Doreen M Olvet; Denis Peruzzo; Binod Thapa-Chhetry; M Elizabeth Sublette; Gregory M Sullivan; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.