Literature DB >> 31446517

Accelerating cardiovascular model building with convolutional neural networks.

Gabriel Maher1, Nathan Wilson2, Alison Marsden3.   

Abstract

The objective of this work is to reduce the user effort required for 2D segmentation when building patient-specific cardiovascular models using the SimVascular cardiovascular modeling software package. The proposed method uses a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) to generate 2D cardiovascular segmentations. Given vessel pathlines, the neural network generates 2D vessel enhancement images along the pathlines. Thereafter, vessel segmentations are extracted using the marching-squares algorithm, which are then used to construct 3D cardiovascular models. The neural network is trained using a novel loss function, tailored for partially labeled segmentation data. An automated quality control method is also developed, allowing promising segmentations to be selected. Compared with a threshold and level set algorithm, the FCNN method improved 2D segmentation accuracy across several metrics. The proposed quality control approach further improved the average DICE score by 25.8%. In tests with users of SimVascular, when using quality control, users accepted 80% of segmentations produced by the best performing FCNN. The FCNN cardiovascular model building method reduces the amount of manual segmentation effort required for patient-specific model construction, by as much as 73%. This leads to reduced turnaround time for cardiovascular simulations. While the method was used for cardiovascular model building, it is applicable to general tubular structures. Graphical Abstract Proposed FCNN-based cardiovascular model building pipeline. a.) Image data and vessel pathline supplied by the user. b.) Path information is used to extract image pixel intensities in plane perpendicular to the vessel path. c.) 2D images extracted along vessel pathlines are input to the FCNN. d.) FCNN acts on the input images to compute local vessel enhancement images. e.) Vessel enhancement images computed by the FCNN, the pixel values are between 0 and 1 indicating vessel tissue likelihood. f.) The marching-squares algorithm is appliedto each enhanced image to extract the central vessel segmentation. g.) 2D extracted vessel surface points overlayed on original input images. h.) The 2D vessel surface points are transformed back to 3D space. i.) 3D crosssectional vessel surfaces are interpolated along the pathline to form the final vessel model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular modeling; Cardiovascular simulation; Convolutional neural networks; Patient-specific modeling; SimVascular

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31446517      PMCID: PMC7250144          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02029-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  30 in total

1.  CURVES: curve evolution for vessel segmentation.

Authors:  L M Lorigo; O D Faugeras; W E Grimson; R Keriven; R Kikinis; A Nabavi; C F Westin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation.

Authors:  Chunming Li; Chenyang Xu; Changfeng Gui; Martin D Fox
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Multiple hypothesis template tracking of small 3D vessel structures.

Authors:  Ola Friman; Milo Hindennach; Caroline Kühnel; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Improving airway segmentation in computed tomography using leak detection with convolutional networks.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Charbonnier; Eva M van Rikxoort; Arnaud A A Setio; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Bram van Ginneken; Francesco Ciompi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Segmentation and reconstruction of vascular structures for 3D real-time simulation.

Authors:  Xunlei Wu; Vincent Luboz; Karl Krissian; Stephane Cotin; Steve Dawson
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Patient-Specific Vascular NURBS Modeling for Isogeometric Analysis of Blood Flow.

Authors:  Yongjie Zhang; Yuri Bazilevs; Samrat Goswami; Chandrajit L Bajaj; Thomas J R Hughes
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 6.756

8.  Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation.

Authors:  J T Dodge; B G Brown; E L Bolson; H T Dodge
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  SimVascular: An Open Source Pipeline for Cardiovascular Simulation.

Authors:  Adam Updegrove; Nathan M Wilson; Jameson Merkow; Hongzhi Lan; Alison L Marsden; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Heart blood flow simulation: a perspective review.

Authors:  Siamak N Doost; Dhanjoo Ghista; Boyang Su; Liang Zhong; Yosry S Morsi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  8 in total

1.  Image-based scaling laws for somatic growth and pulmonary artery morphometry from infancy to adulthood.

Authors:  Melody Dong; Weiguang Yang; John S Tamaresis; Frandics P Chan; Evan J Zucker; Sahana Kumar; Marlene Rabinovitch; Alison L Marsden; Jeffrey A Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  A deep-learning approach for direct whole-heart mesh reconstruction.

Authors:  Fanwei Kong; Nathan Wilson; Shawn Shadden
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 13.828

Review 3.  Physiology and coronary artery disease: emerging insights from computed tomography imaging based computational modeling.

Authors:  Parastou Eslami; Vikas Thondapu; Julia Karady; Eline M J Hartman; Zexi Jin; Mazen Albaghdadi; Michael Lu; Jolanda J Wentzel; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Computational Hemodynamic Modeling of Arterial Aneurysms: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Sarah N Lipp; Elizabeth E Niedert; Hannah L Cebull; Tyler C Diorio; Jessica L Ma; Sean M Rothenberger; Kimberly A Stevens Boster; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  A Deep Learning Framework for Design and Analysis of Surgical Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.

Authors:  Aditya Balu; Sahiti Nallagonda; Fei Xu; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Ming-Chen Hsu; Soumik Sarkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Deep Learning-Based Available and Common Clinical-Related Feature Variables Robustly Predict Survival in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Ding-Yun Feng; Yong Ren; Mi Zhou; Xiao-Ling Zou; Wen-Bin Wu; Hai-Ling Yang; Yu-Qi Zhou; Tian-Tuo Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-09-04

7.  Applications and Challenges of Machine Learning to Enable Realistic Cellular Simulations.

Authors:  Ritvik Vasan; Meagan P Rowan; Christopher T Lee; Gregory R Johnson; Padmini Rangamani; Michael Holst
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-01-21

Review 8.  Heart Valve Biomechanics: The Frontiers of Modeling Modalities and the Expansive Capabilities of Ex Vivo Heart Simulation.

Authors:  Matthew H Park; Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Hanjay Wang; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Michael J Paulsen; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.