Literature DB >> 25102926

Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis.

Jacky Au1, Ellen Sheehan, Nancy Tsai, Greg J Duncan, Martin Buschkuehl, Susanne M Jaeggi.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM), the ability to store and manipulate information for short periods of time, is an important predictor of scholastic aptitude and a critical bottleneck underlying higher-order cognitive processes, including controlled attention and reasoning. Recent interventions targeting WM have suggested plasticity of the WM system by demonstrating improvements in both trained and untrained WM tasks. However, evidence on transfer of improved WM into more general cognitive domains such as fluid intelligence (Gf) has been more equivocal. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis focusing on one specific training program, n-back. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for all n-back training studies with Gf outcome measures, a control group, and healthy participants between 18 and 50 years of age. In total, we included 20 studies in our analyses that met our criteria and found a small but significant positive effect of n-back training on improving Gf. Several factors that moderate this transfer are identified and discussed. We conclude that short-term cognitive training on the order of weeks can result in beneficial effects in important cognitive functions as measured by laboratory tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25102926     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  36 in total

1.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  E L Deci; R Koestner; R M Ryan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved.

Authors:  W T Dickens; J R Flynn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments.

Authors:  Richard E Nisbett; Joshua Aronson; Clancy Blair; William Dickens; James Flynn; Diane F Halpern; Eric Turkheimer
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2012-01-02

4.  Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues.

Authors:  J Cameron; K M Banko; W D Pierce
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Improving intelligence: a literature review.

Authors:  M Buschkuehl; S M Jaeggi
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Increased parietal activity after training of interference control.

Authors:  Stephan Oelhafen; Aki Nikolaidis; Tullia Padovani; Daniela Blaser; Thomas Koenig; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.

Authors:  Catherine O Fritz; Peter E Morris; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-08

9.  Working memory training improvements and gains in non-trained cognitive tasks in young and older adults.

Authors:  Stephan Heinzel; Stefanie Schulte; Johanna Onken; Quynh-Lam Duong; Thomas G Riemer; Andreas Heinz; Norbert Kathmann; Michael A Rapp
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-05-02

10.  Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence.

Authors:  Todd W Thompson; Michael L Waskom; Keri-Lee A Garel; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Gretchen O Reynolds; Rebecca Winter; Patricia Chang; Kiersten Pollard; Nupur Lala; George A Alvarez; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  142 in total

1.  There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015).

Authors:  Jacky Au; Martin Buschkuehl; Greg J Duncan; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  Working memory training in children: Effectiveness depends on temperament.

Authors:  Barbara Studer-Luethi; Catherine Bauer; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

3.  Brain network modularity predicts cognitive training-related gains in young adults.

Authors:  Pauline L Baniqued; Courtney L Gallen; Michael B Kranz; Arthur F Kramer; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Harnessing centred identity transformation to reduce executive function burden for maintenance of health behaviour change: the Maintain IT model.

Authors:  Ann E Caldwell; Kevin S Masters; John C Peters; Angela D Bryan; Jim Grigsby; Stephanie A Hooker; Holly R Wyatt; James O Hill
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-02-19

5.  Reevaluating the effectiveness of n-back training on transfer through the Bayesian lens: Support for the null.

Authors:  Michael R Dougherty; Toby Hamovitz; Joe W Tidwell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

6.  There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is effective: A reply to Au et al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014).

Authors:  Monica Melby-Lervåg; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

7.  Investigating the effectiveness of working memory training in the context of Personality Systems Interaction theory.

Authors:  Tomáš Urbánek; Vladimír Marček
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-25

8.  Editorial Special Topic: Enhancing Brain and Cognition Through Cognitive Training.

Authors:  Susanne M Jaeggi; Julia Karbach; Tilo Strobach
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 9.  Environmental influences on development of executive functions in dogs.

Authors:  Maike Foraita; Tiffani Howell; Pauleen Bennett
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 10.  Retest effects in working memory capacity tests: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jana Scharfen; Katrin Jansen; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.