Literature DB >> 21823805

Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.

Catherine O Fritz1, Peter E Morris, Jennifer J Richler.   

Abstract

The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (American Psychological Association, 2001, American Psychological Association, 2010) calls for the reporting of effect sizes and their confidence intervals. Estimates of effect size are useful for determining the practical or theoretical importance of an effect, the relative contributions of factors, and the power of an analysis. We surveyed articles published in 2009 and 2010 in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, noting the statistical analyses reported and the associated reporting of effect size estimates. Effect sizes were reported for fewer than half of the analyses; no article reported a confidence interval for an effect size. The most often reported analysis was analysis of variance, and almost half of these reports were not accompanied by effect sizes. Partial η2 was the most commonly reported effect size estimate for analysis of variance. For t tests, 2/3 of the articles did not report an associated effect size estimate; Cohen's d was the most often reported. We provide a straightforward guide to understanding, selecting, calculating, and interpreting effect sizes for many types of data and to methods for calculating effect size confidence intervals and power analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823805     DOI: 10.1037/a0024338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  713 in total

1.  Task-irrelevant perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Yetta K Wong; Jonathan R Folstein; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Gokyo Khumbu/Ama Dablam Trek 2012: effects of physical training and high-altitude exposure on oxidative metabolism, muscle composition, and metabolic cost of walking in women.

Authors:  E Tam; P Bruseghini; E Calabria; L Dal Sacco; C Doria; B Grassi; T Pietrangelo; S Pogliaghi; C Reggiani; D Salvadego; F Schena; L Toniolo; V Verratti; G Vernillo; Carlo Capelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Anthony J Ryals; Samantha R Wagner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: expressing and interpreting associations and effect sizes in clinical outcome assessments.

Authors:  Lori D McLeod; Joseph C Cappelleri; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Functional Disability in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cutter A Lindbergh; Rodney K Dishman; L Stephen Miller
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Bird diversity and dissimilarity show contrasting patterns along heavy metal pollution gradients in the Urals, Russia.

Authors:  Eugen A Belskii; Vladimir S Mikryukov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Differential patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy and their relation to spinal degeneration and post-treatment changes in disc diffusion.

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Eric C Parent; Sukhvinder S Dhillon; Narasimha Prasad; Dino Samartzis; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Structure of the Mucosal and Stool Microbiome in Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Yan Yan; David A Drew; Arnold Markowitz; Jason Lloyd-Price; Galeb Abu-Ali; Long H Nguyen; Christina Tran; Daniel C Chung; Katherine K Gilpin; Dana Meixell; Melanie Parziale; Madeline Schuck; Zalak Patel; James M Richter; Peter B Kelsey; Wendy S Garrett; Andrew T Chan; Zsofia K Stadler; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.023

10.  Size of the associations between anticholinergic burden tool scores and adverse outcomes in older patients.

Authors:  Marta Lavrador; Ana C Cabral; Isabel V Figueiredo; Manuel T Veríssimo; M Margarida Castel-Branco; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2020-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.