Literature DB >> 23982078

Increased parietal activity after training of interference control.

Stephan Oelhafen1, Aki Nikolaidis, Tullia Padovani, Daniela Blaser, Thomas Koenig, Walter J Perrig.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that computerized cognitive training leads to improved performance in related but untrained tasks (i.e. transfer effects). However, most study designs prevent disentangling which of the task components are necessary for transfer. In the current study, we examined whether training on two variants of the adaptive dual n-back task would affect untrained task performance and the corresponding electrophysiological event-related potentials (ERPs). Forty three healthy young adults were trained for three weeks with a high or low interference training variant of the dual n-back task, or they were assigned to a passive control group. While n-back training with high interference led to partial improvements in the Attention Network Test (ANT), we did not find transfer to measures of working memory and fluid intelligence. ERP analysis in the n-back task and the ANT indicated overlapping processes in the P3 time range. Moreover, in the ANT, we detected increased parietal activity for the interference training group alone. In contrast, we did not find electrophysiological differences between the low interference training and the control group. These findings suggest that training on an interference control task leads to higher electrophysiological activity in the parietal cortex, which may be related to improvements in processing speed, attentional control, or both.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cognitive training; Electrical neuroimaging; Event-related potential (ERP); Interference control; Parietal cortex; n-back

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982078     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  19 in total

1.  Reevaluating the effectiveness of n-back training on transfer through the Bayesian lens: Support for the null.

Authors:  Michael R Dougherty; Toby Hamovitz; Joe W Tidwell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is effective: A reply to Au et al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014).

Authors:  Monica Melby-Lervåg; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

3.  Investigating the effectiveness of working memory training in the context of Personality Systems Interaction theory.

Authors:  Tomáš Urbánek; Vladimír Marček
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-25

4.  Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.

Authors:  Anna Soveri; Jan Antfolk; Linda Karlsson; Benny Salo; Matti Laine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

5.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Ellen Sheehan; Nancy Tsai; Greg J Duncan; Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

6.  Quantifying the Difference between Active and Passive Control Groups in Cognitive Interventions Using two Meta-Analytical Approaches.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Benjamin C Gibson; Kimberly Bunarjo; Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2020-01-29

7.  The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-05

8.  Bagging improves reproducibility of functional parcellation of the human brain.

Authors:  Aki Nikolaidis; Anibal Solon Heinsfeld; Ting Xu; Pierre Bellec; Joshua Vogelstein; Michael Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Tactile angle discriminability improvement: contributions of working memory training and continuous attended sensory input.

Authors:  Wu Wang; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Huazhi Li; Yulong Liu; Yiyang Yu; Jiabin Yu; Xiaoyu Tang; Jingjing Yang; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.974

10.  Polygenic Scores for Cognitive Abilities and Their Association with Different Aspects of General Intelligence-A Deep Phenotyping Approach.

Authors:  Erhan Genç; Caroline Schlüter; Christoph Fraenz; Larissa Arning; Dorothea Metzen; Huu Phuc Nguyen; Manuel C Voelkle; Fabian Streit; Onur Güntürkün; Robert Kumsta; Sebastian Ocklenburg
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.