Literature DB >> 15631552

Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Michael J Kane1, David Z Hambrick1, Andrew R A Conway1.   

Abstract

The authors agree with P. L. Ackerman, M. E. Beier, and M. O. Boyle (2005; see record 2004-22408-002) that working memory capacity (WMC) is not isomorphic with general fluid intelligence (Gf) or reasoning ability. However, the WMC and Gf/reasoning constructs are more strongly associated than Ackerman et al. (2005) indicate, particularly when considering the outcomes of latent-variable studies. The authors' reanalysis of 14 such data sets from 10 published studies, representing more than 3,100 young-adult subjects, suggests a strong correlation between WMC and Gf/reasoning factors (median r=.72), indicating that the WMC and Gf constructs share approximately 50% of their variance. This comment also clarifies the authors' "executive attention" view of WMC, it demonstrates that WMC has greater discriminant validity than Ackerman et al. (2005) implied, and it suggests some future directions and challenges for the scientific study of the convergence of WMC, attention control, and intelligence. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15631552     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  94 in total

1.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Similar prefrontal cortical activities between general fluid intelligence and visuospatial working memory tasks in preschool children as revealed by optical topography.

Authors:  Mariko Kuwajima; Toshiyuki Sawaguchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2012-03-12

Review 4.  Fragile X syndrome and targeted treatment trials.

Authors:  Randi Hagerman; Julie Lauterborn; Jacky Au; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

5.  The validity of "conceptual span" as a measure of working memory capacity.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Tina M Miyake
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Jeffrey E Pink; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2008

7.  Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis.

Authors:  Heather Bailey; John Dunlosky; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

Review 8.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Evolution of working memory.

Authors:  Peter Carruthers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns; Anuenue Kukona
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.