Literature DB >> 26082280

Reevaluating the effectiveness of n-back training on transfer through the Bayesian lens: Support for the null.

Michael R Dougherty1, Toby Hamovitz2, Joe W Tidwell2.   

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis by Au et al. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366-377, (2015) reviewed the n-back training paradigm for working memory (WM) and evaluated whether (when aggregating across existing studies) there was evidence that gains obtained for training tasks transferred to gains in fluid intelligence (Gf). Their results revealed an overall effect size of g = 0.24 for the effect of n-back training on Gf. We reexamine the data through a Bayesian lens, to evaluate the relative strength of the evidence for the alternative versus null hypotheses, contingent on the type of control condition used. We find that studies using a noncontact (passive) control group strongly favor the alternative hypothesis that training leads to transfer but that studies using active-control groups show modest evidence in favor of the null. We discuss these findings in the context of placebo effects.

Keywords:  Bayes factors; Meta-analysis; N-back; Placebo effects; Working memory training

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26082280     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0865-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  35 in total

1.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Increased parietal activity after training of interference control.

Authors:  Stephan Oelhafen; Aki Nikolaidis; Tullia Padovani; Daniela Blaser; Thomas Koenig; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology: Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Daniel J Simons; Cary Stothart; Cassie Stutts
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07

4.  Dual n-back training increases the capacity of the focus of attention.

Authors:  Lindsey Lilienthal; Elaine Tamez; Jill Talley Shelton; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

5.  Working memory training improvements and gains in non-trained cognitive tasks in young and older adults.

Authors:  Stephan Heinzel; Stefanie Schulte; Johanna Onken; Quynh-Lam Duong; Thomas G Riemer; Andreas Heinz; Norbert Kathmann; Michael A Rapp
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-05-02

6.  Making working memory work: a meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults.

Authors:  Julia Karbach; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-10-08

7.  Averaging expectancies and perceptual experiences in the assessment of quality.

Authors:  M R Dougherty; J Shanteau
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-03

8.  Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence.

Authors:  Todd W Thompson; Michael L Waskom; Keri-Lee A Garel; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Gretchen O Reynolds; Rebecca Winter; Patricia Chang; Kiersten Pollard; Nupur Lala; George A Alvarez; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A potential spatial working memory training task to improve both episodic memory and fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Sarah R Rudebeck; Daniel Bor; Angharad Ormond; Jill X O'Reilly; Andy C H Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is working memory training effective? A study in a school setting.

Authors:  Catrin Rode; Robby Robson; Andy Purviance; David C Geary; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015).

Authors:  Jacky Au; Martin Buschkuehl; Greg J Duncan; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  Brain network modularity predicts cognitive training-related gains in young adults.

Authors:  Pauline L Baniqued; Courtney L Gallen; Michael B Kranz; Arthur F Kramer; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.

Authors:  Anna Soveri; Jan Antfolk; Linda Karlsson; Benny Salo; Matti Laine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  A simultaneous examination of two forms of working memory training: Evidence for near transfer only.

Authors:  Meredith Minear; Faith Brasher; Claudia Brandt Guerrero; Mandy Brasher; Andrew Moore; Joshua Sukeena
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

5.  Placebo effects in cognitive training.

Authors:  Cyrus K Foroughi; Samuel S Monfort; Martin Paczynski; Patrick E McKnight; P M Greenwood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  When less is more: costs and benefits of varied vs. fixed content and structure in short-term task switching training.

Authors:  Katrina Sabah; Thomas Dolk; Nachshon Meiran; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach.

Authors:  Brooke M Okada; L Robert Slevc
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

8.  Training working memory updating in young adults.

Authors:  Rocío Linares; Erika Borella; M Teresa Lechuga; Barbara Carretti; Santiago Pelegrina
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-09

9.  The Hype Cycle of Working Memory Training.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-05-16

10.  Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training.

Authors:  Katrina Sabah; Thomas Dolk; Nachshon Meiran; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.