| Literature DB >> 25093208 |
Rina Sakai1, Takeaki Yamamoto2, Katsufumi Uchiyama2, Kentaro Uchida2, Masaki Nakao3, Kiyoshi Mabuchi1.
Abstract
In cementless stem fixation, BMD reduction around the stem is of concern because it may cause loosening. This BMD reduction is assumed to be caused by stem implantation-induced alteration of the physiological feedback system, which may cause stress shielding and result in loosening, but the causal relationship has not been clarified. In this study, using a Duetto SI stem, we investigated the correlation between the postoperative BMD around the stem and stress. In patients who underwent their first THA at the orthopedic department of our university, the BMD was measured using DEXA, and FEA was performed with an equivalent time course. Time-course changes in the BMD, von Mises stress, and triaxial stress in Gruen zones 1 through 7 were calculated from those measured at 2 weeks and 5 months after surgery. The BMD and von Mises stress showed a bidirectional correlation when Gruen's classification was plotted on the horizontal axis. An increase in stress loaded on bone was assumed to be a factor increasing the BMD. The Duetto SI stem was fixed on the distal side, suggesting its stable fixation. BMD measurement and FEA were useful for quantification of the bone dynamics around the stem from an early phase.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25093208 PMCID: PMC4100402 DOI: 10.1155/2014/786185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Duetto SI stem with a thin cross-sectional shape. (a) Medial side. (b) Arterial side. The stem surface was processed to produce 6-micron roughness in order to induce bone ongrowth.
Figure 2Loading and constraint conditions of FE model. A resultant force of 1,800 N was applied to the head at an angle of 30° along the long axis. An abductor force of 1,440 N was applied from the greater trochanter along the long axis at an angle of 20°. Hatched squares represent restrained regions.
Figure 3BMD measured by DEXA. (a) BMD values in each zone 2 weeks and 5 months after the operation. (b) X-ray image and Gruen's zone classification.
Figure 4Von Mises stress distribution analyzed by finite element methods. (a) Two weeks. (b) Five months.
Figure 5Von Mises stress analyzed by finite element methods. (a) Von Mises stress values in each zone 2 weeks and 5 months after the operation. (b) Finite element model and Gruen's zone classification.
Figure 6Time series data on stress in the 3 axis directions in each zone obtained by FEM immediately until 5 months after the operation. (a) x-axis (medial-lateral) direction. (b) y-axis (anterior-posterior) direction. (c) z-axis (sinking) direction.