Literature DB >> 7697961

Comparison between metacarpal bone measurements by computarized radiogrammetry and total body DEXA in normal and osteoporotic women.

H Rico1, M Revilla, L F Villa, J F Martin-Santos, J L Cardenas, E Fraile.   

Abstract

We evaluated the precision of metacarpal radiogrammetry by computed radiography as a technique for bone mass measurement. Measurements obtained using this method were compared with densitometric measurements of total body bone mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Our results showed that the coefficients of variation for radiogrammetric measurements were similar in 60 women with osteoporosis and in 100 normal women: 0.7% in both groups for external diameter of the second metacarpal, 2.41% in the normal women and 2.03% in the women with osteoporosis for internal diameter, and 2.3% and 2.4%, respectively, for cortical thickness. Except for external metacarpal diameter, which did not differ between normal and osteoporotic women, all the measurements were smaller in the women with osteoporosis (p < 0.001). The correlation between metacarpal cortical thickness and total body bone mineral content was r2 = 0.462 in the women with osteoporosis, r2 = 0.476 in the controls, and r2 = 0.522 in the two groups combined (all p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between cortical thickness and densitometric metacarpal measurements of both the diaphysis and epiphysis. These results confirm the value of radiogrammetry as a technique for quantitating bone mass under normal and pathological conditions. Additional advantages of the method are minimal radiation dose delivered, possibility for storing the image and data, and technical facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7697961     DOI: 10.1007/bf02243000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  29 in total

1.  The relation between periodontitis and systemic bone mass in women between 46 and 55 years of age.

Authors:  P J Elders; L L Habets; J C Netelenbos; L W van der Linden; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Compact and trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; A Clain; E Brown
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Digital radiography: uses and limitations of the method.

Authors:  D L Novak; B F Bates
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L Strause; M Bracker; P Saltman; D Sartoris; E Kerr
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Observer error and measurements of the metacarpal.

Authors:  P Adams; G T Davies; P M Sweetnam
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Increased metacarpal bone mass following 18 months of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A A Kalla; O L Meyers; D Chalton; S Heath; G M Brown; P R Smith; M C Burger
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1991-04

9.  Trabecular spacing in post-menopausal Australian women with and without vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R J Moore; T C Durbridge; P J McNeil; I H Parkinson; A G Need; B Vernon-Roberts
Journal:  Aust N Z J Med       Date:  1992-06

10.  Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.

Authors:  W D Reinbold; H K Genant; U J Reiser; S T Harris; B Ettinger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Vertebral and metacarpal morphometry as indicators of nutritional improvement.

Authors:  M Revilla; E Fraile; F Aguado; E R Hermandez; L F Villa; H Rico
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Bone mass in Parkinson's disease: a study with three methods.

Authors:  M Revilla; G de la Sierra; F Aguado; L Varela; F J Jiménez-Jiménez; H Rico
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Sex and External Size Specific Limitations in Assessing Bone Health From Adult Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  Erin M R Bigelow; Robert W Goulet; Antonio Ciarelli; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Sioban D Harlow; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.