Literature DB >> 25609581

[Digital breast tomosynthesis].

H Preibsch1, K C Siegmann-Luz.   

Abstract

In digital breast tomosynthesis several low dose mammograms are acquired from different angles to calculate thin slices of synthetic mammograms from algorithms. Similar to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, breast tomosynthesis provides breast images which are virtually free from superimposition. This is in particular important in cases of high mammographic density to differentiate real masses and architectural distortions from the overlying parenchyma. In comparison to full field digital mammography tomosynthesis can improve the cancer detection rate and reduce the recall rate. The limitations of tomosynthesis are the higher radiation dose and the longer reporting time compared to full field digital mammography. Until the radiation dose can be significantly reduced it is advisable to use tomosynthesis in addition to full field digital mammography primarily for the assessment of suspicious mammographic findings and not for breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609581     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2753-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  29 in total

1.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.

Authors:  Matthew G Wallis; Elin Moa; Federica Zanca; Karin Leifland; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jay A Baker; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty; Jeong Mi Park; Liane E Philpotts; Steven P Poplack; Jules H Sumkin; Elkan F Halpern; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography.

Authors:  J C Morel; A Iqbal; R K Wasan; C Peacock; D R Evans; R Rahim; J Goligher; M J Michell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Luke Partyka; Ana P Lourenco; Martha B Mainiero
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Su Hyun Lee; Nariya Cho; Mirinae Seo; Won Hwa Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.

Authors:  Christian Waldherr; Peter Cerny; Hans J Altermatt; Gilles Berclaz; Michele Ciriolo; Katharina Buser; Martin J Sonnenschein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.

Authors:  N Perry; M Broeders; C de Wolf; S Törnberg; R Holland; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Ben Guo; Victor J Catullo; Denise M Chough; Amy E Kelly; Amy H Lu; Grace Y Rathfon; Marion Lee Spangler; Jules H Sumkin; Luisa P Wallace; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Digital breast tomosynthesis changes management in patients seen at a tertiary care breast center.

Authors:  L Margolies; A Cohen; E Sonnenblick; J Mandeli; P H Schmidt; J Szabo; N Patel; G Hermann; C Weltz; E Port
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2014-03-03
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

Authors:  M Funke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.