Literature DB >> 25075270

Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for Estrogen-Receptor positive breast cancer.

Brad M Keller1, Jinbo Chen2, Emily F Conant1, Despina Kontos1.   

Abstract

Accurate assessment of a woman's risk to develop specific subtypes of breast cancer is critical for appropriate utilization of chemopreventative measures, such as with tamoxifen in preventing estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. In this context, we investigate quantitative measures of breast density and parenchymal texture, measures of glandular tissue content and tissue structure, as risk factors for estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Mediolateral oblique (MLO) view digital mammograms of the contralateral breast from 106 women with unilateral invasive breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Breast density and parenchymal texture were analyzed via fully-automated software. Logistic regression with feature selection and was performed to predict ER+ versus ER- cancer status. A combined model considering all imaging measures extracted was compared to baseline models consisting of density-alone and texture-alone features. Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Delong's test were used to compare the models' discriminatory capacity for receptor status. The density-alone model had a discriminatory capacity of 0.62 AUC (p=0.05). The texture-alone model had a higher discriminatory capacity of 0.70 AUC (p=0.001), which was not significantly different compared to the density-alone model (p=0.37). In contrast the combined density-texture logistic regression model had a discriminatory capacity of 0.82 AUC (p<0.001), which was statistically significantly higher than both the density-alone (p<0.001) and texture-alone regression models (p=0.04). The combination of breast density and texture measures may have the potential to identify women specifically at risk for estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer and could be useful in triaging women into appropriate risk-reduction strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer Risk; Breast Percent Density (PD%); Digital Mammography; Parenchymal Texture; Receptor

Year:  2014        PMID: 25075270      PMCID: PMC4112103          DOI: 10.1117/12.2043710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  18 in total

1.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.

Authors:  Z Huo; M L Giger; D E Wolverton; W Zhong; S Cumming; O I Olopade
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evidence-based breast cancer prevention: the importance of individual risk.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention.

Authors:  B Rockhill; D Spiegelman; C Byrne; D J Hunter; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Chen; W Thompson; R Semenciw; Y Mao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Paul Weatherall; David Thickman; Nola Hylton; Ellen Warner; Etta Pisano; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell Schnall; Gia A DeAngelis; Paul Stomper; Eric L Rosen; Michael O'Loughlin; Steven Harms; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Reena S Cecchini; Walter M Cronin; Andre Robidoux; Therese B Bevers; Maureen T Kavanah; James N Atkins; Richard G Margolese; Carolyn D Runowicz; Joan M James; Leslie G Ford; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Preventing breast cancer in high-risk women, 2008.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.990

9.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Dania Daye; Brad Keller; Emily F Conant; Jinbo Chen; Mitchell D Schnall; Andrew D A Maidment; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Breast Cancer Biomarkers: CALGB 70806 (Alliance) Study Design and Baseline Data.

Authors:  Ogheneruona Apoe; Sin-Ho Jung; Heshan Liu; Drew K Seisler; Jayne Charlamb; Patricia Zekan; Lili X Wang; Gary W Unzeitig; Judy Garber; James Marshall; Marie Wood
Journal:  Am J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-07

Review 2.  Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Dooman Arefan; Aly A Mohamed; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Howell; Annie S Anderson; Robert B Clarke; Stephen W Duffy; D Gareth Evans; Montserat Garcia-Closas; Andy J Gescher; Timothy J Key; John M Saxton; Michelle N Harvie
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; John A Shepherd; Christopher G Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Lin Ma; Kimberly A Bertrand; Fergus Couch; Matthew R Jensen; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Bo Fan; Aaron Norman; Kathleen R Brandt; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Adam R Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; Elaine F Harkness; D Gareth Evans; Susan Astley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on breast DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Braman; Maryam Etesami; Prateek Prasanna; Christina Dubchuk; Hannah Gilmore; Pallavi Tiwari; Donna Plecha; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  A Deep Learning Approach to Re-create Raw Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Breast Density and Texture Analysis.

Authors:  Hai Shu; Tingyu Chiang; Peng Wei; Kim-Anh Do; Michele D Lesslie; Ethan O Cohen; Ashmitha Srinivasan; Tanya W Moseley; Lauren Q Chang Sen; Jessica W T Leung; Jennifer B Dennison; Sam M Hanash; Olena O Weaver
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.