Literature DB >> 19920276

Evidence-based breast cancer prevention: the importance of individual risk.

Karla Kerlikowske.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19920276     DOI： 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN： 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


× No keyword cloud information.
  21 in total

1.  The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Manuf Serv Oper Manag       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.600

2.  Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography.

Authors:  Kenyon C Bolton; John L Mace; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Ted A James; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta M Geller; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Lynda C Ikejimba; Predrag R Bakic; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Integrating age and comorbidity to assess screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  Alai Tan; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; Julia Arfi-Rouche; Bruno Boyer; Emilien Gauthier; Valerie Helin; Ara Loshkajian; Stephane Ragusa; Suzette Delaloge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among low-income women with access to mammography.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; John Z Ayanian; Jennifer D Allen; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Diana L Miglioretti; Natasha K Stout; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Diana S M Buist; Hui Huang; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Aimee M Near; Karla Kerlikowske; Heidi D Nelson; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Breast cancer screening with mammography.

Authors:  Bradford R Hirsch; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a case-control and cohort validation study.

Authors:  Olaide Y Raji; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunshola F Agbaje; Stuart G Baker; David C Christiani; Adrian Cassidy; John K Field
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Mammographic screening interval in relation to tumor characteristics and false-positive risk by race/ethnicity and age.

Authors:  Ellen S O'Meara; Weiwei Zhu; Rebecca A Hubbard; Dejana Braithwaite; Karla Kerlikowske; Kim L Dittus; Berta Geller; Karen J Wernli; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.