Literature DB >> 34350403

A Deep Learning Approach to Re-create Raw Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Breast Density and Texture Analysis.

Hai Shu1, Tingyu Chiang1, Peng Wei1, Kim-Anh Do1, Michele D Lesslie1, Ethan O Cohen1, Ashmitha Srinivasan1, Tanya W Moseley1, Lauren Q Chang Sen1, Jessica W T Leung1, Jennifer B Dennison1, Sam M Hanash1, Olena O Weaver1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a computational approach to re-create rarely stored for-processing (raw) digital mammograms from routinely stored for-presentation (processed) mammograms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, pairs of raw and processed mammograms collected in 884 women (mean age, 57 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 3713 mammograms) from October 5, 2017, to August 1, 2018, were examined. Mammograms were split 3088 for training and 625 for testing. A deep learning approach based on a U-Net convolutional network and kernel regression was developed to estimate the raw images. The estimated raw images were compared with the originals by four image error and similarity metrics, breast density calculations, and 29 widely used texture features.
RESULTS: In the testing dataset, the estimated raw images had small normalized mean absolute error (0.022 ± 0.015), scaled mean absolute error (0.134 ± 0.078) and mean absolute percentage error (0.115 ± 0.059), and a high structural similarity index (0.986 ± 0.007) for the breast portion compared with the original raw images. The estimated and original raw images had a strong correlation in breast density percentage (Pearson r = 0.946) and a strong agreement in breast density grade (Cohen κ = 0.875). The estimated images had satisfactory correlations with the originals in 23 texture features (Pearson r ≥ 0.503 or Spearman ρ ≥ 0.705) and were well complemented by processed images for the other six features.
CONCLUSION: This deep learning approach performed well in re-creating raw mammograms with strong agreement in four image evaluation metrics, breast density, and the majority of 29 widely used texture features.Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep learning algorithms, Machine Learning AlgorithmsSee also the commentary by Chan in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Deep learning algorithms; Machine Learning Algorithms; Mammography; Supervised Learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 34350403      PMCID: PMC8328112          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  23 in total

1.  Multiple outputation: inference for complex clustered data by averaging analyses from independent data.

Authors:  Dean Follmann; Michael Proschan; Eric Leifer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images.

Authors:  Guilherme Aresta; Teresa Araújo; Scotty Kwok; Sai Saketh Chennamsetty; Mohammed Safwan; Varghese Alex; Bahram Marami; Marcel Prastawa; Monica Chan; Michael Donovan; Gerardo Fernandez; Jack Zeineh; Matthias Kohl; Christoph Walz; Florian Ludwig; Stefan Braunewell; Maximilian Baust; Quoc Dang Vu; Minh Nguyen Nhat To; Eal Kim; Jin Tae Kwak; Sameh Galal; Veronica Sanchez-Freire; Nadia Brancati; Maria Frucci; Daniel Riccio; Yaqi Wang; Lingling Sun; Kaiqiang Ma; Jiannan Fang; Ismael Kone; Lahsen Boulmane; Aurélio Campilho; Catarina Eloy; António Polónia; Paulo Aguiar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Brad M Keller; Shonket Ray; Yan Wang; Emily F Conant; James C Gee; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Analysis of intensity normalization for optimal segmentation performance of a fully convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Nina Jacobsen; Andreas Deistung; Dagmar Timmann; Sophia L Goericke; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Daniel Güllmar
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.820

5.  Inferring marginal association with paired and unpaired clustered data.

Authors:  Douglas J Lorenz; Steven Levy; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.

Authors:  Shalini Gupta; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for Estrogen-Receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-27

10.  IDRiD: Diabetic Retinopathy - Segmentation and Grading Challenge.

Authors:  Prasanna Porwal; Samiksha Pachade; Manesh Kokare; Girish Deshmukh; Jaemin Son; Woong Bae; Lihong Liu; Jianzong Wang; Xinhui Liu; Liangxin Gao; TianBo Wu; Jing Xiao; Fengyan Wang; Baocai Yin; Yunzhi Wang; Gopichandh Danala; Linsheng He; Yoon Ho Choi; Yeong Chan Lee; Sang-Hyuk Jung; Zhongyu Li; Xiaodan Sui; Junyan Wu; Xiaolong Li; Ting Zhou; Janos Toth; Agnes Baran; Avinash Kori; Sai Saketh Chennamsetty; Mohammed Safwan; Varghese Alex; Xingzheng Lyu; Li Cheng; Qinhao Chu; Pengcheng Li; Xin Ji; Sanyuan Zhang; Yaxin Shen; Ling Dai; Oindrila Saha; Rachana Sathish; Tânia Melo; Teresa Araújo; Balazs Harangi; Bin Sheng; Ruogu Fang; Debdoot Sheet; Andras Hajdu; Yuanjie Zheng; Ana Maria Mendonça; Shaoting Zhang; Aurélio Campilho; Bin Zheng; Dinggang Shen; Luca Giancardo; Gwenolé Quellec; Fabrice Mériaudeau
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  2 in total

1.  BiTr-Unet: a CNN-Transformer Combined Network for MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Qiran Jia; Hai Shu
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 2.  Radiomics, deep learning and early diagnosis in oncology.

Authors:  Peng Wei
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.