Literature DB >> 10659732

Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.

Z Huo1, M L Giger, D E Wolverton, W Zhong, S Cumming, O I Olopade.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to identify computer-extracted, mammographic parenchymal patterns that are associated with breast cancer risk. We extracted 14 features from the central breast region on digitized mammograms to characterize the mammographic parenchymal patterns of women at different risk levels. Two different approaches were employed to relate these mammographic features to breast cancer risk. In one approach, the features were used to distinguish mammographic patterns seen in low-risk women from those who inherited a mutated form of the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene, which confers a very high risk of developing breast cancer. In another approach, the features were related to risk as determined from existing clinical models (Gail and Claus models), which use well-known epidemiological factors such as a woman's age, her family history of breast cancer, reproductive history, etc. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis was employed to identify features that were useful in differentiating between "low-risk" women and BRCA1/BRCA2-mutation carriers. Stepwise linear regression analysis was employed to identify useful features in predicting the risk, as estimated from the Gail and Claus models. Similar computer-extracted mammographic features were identified in the two approaches. Results show that women at high risk tend to have dense breasts and their mammographic patterns tend to be coarse and low in contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10659732     DOI: 10.1118/1.598851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  S K Kinoshita; P M Azevedo-Marques; R R Pereira; J A H Rodrigues; R M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Li Lan; Jyothi Janardanan; Charlene A Sennett
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-13

6.  Automated analysis of breast parenchymal patterns in whole breast ultrasound images: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Yuji Ikedo; Takako Morita; Daisuke Fukuoka; Takeshi Hara; Gobert Lee; Hiroshi Fujita; Etsuo Takada; Tokiko Endo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Lynda C Ikejimba; Predrag R Bakic; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CFS-SMO based classification of breast density using multiple texture models.

Authors:  Vipul Sharma; Sukhwinder Singh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Li Lan; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Aoife MacMahon; Mary Mussman; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Charlene Sennett
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study.

Authors:  Deborah J Thompson; Martin O Leach; Gek Kwan-Lim; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Iqbal Warsi; Fiona Lennard; Michael Khazen; Emilie Bryant; Sadie Reed; Caroline R M Boggis; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind A Eeles; Douglas F Easton; Ruth M L Warren
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.