Literature DB >> 23570938

Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.

Dania Daye1, Brad Keller, Emily F Conant, Jinbo Chen, Mitchell D Schnall, Andrew D A Maidment, Despina Kontos.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Parenchymal texture patterns have been previously associated with breast cancer risk, yet their underlying biological determinants remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the potential of mammographic parenchymal texture as a phenotypic imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Digital mammography (DM) images in the craniocaudal (CC) view from 297 women, 154 without breast cancer and 143 with unilateral breast cancer, were analyzed. Menopause status was used as a surrogate of cumulative endogenous hormonal exposure. Parenchymal texture features were extracted and mammographic percent density (MD%) was computed using validated computerized methods. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between texture features and menopause status, after adjusting for MD% and hormonally related confounders. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of each model was estimated to evaluate the degree of association between the extracted mammographic features and menopause status.
RESULTS: Coarseness, gray-level correlation, and fractal dimension texture features have a significant independent association with menopause status in the cancer-affected population; skewness and fractal dimension exhibit a similar association in the cancer-free population (P < .05). The ROC AUC of the logistic regression model including all texture features was 0.70 (P < .05) for cancer-affected and 0.63 (P < .05) for cancer-free women. Texture features retained significant association with menopause status (P < .05) after adjusting for MD%, age at menarche, ethnicity, contraception use, hormone replacement therapy, parity, and age at first birth.
CONCLUSION: Mammographic texture patterns may reflect the effect of endogenous hormonal exposure on the breast tissue and may capture such effects beyond mammographic density. Differences in texture features between pre- and postmenopausal women are more pronounced in the cancer-affected population, which may be attributed to an increased association to breast cancer risk. Texture features could ultimately be incorporated in breast cancer risk assessment models as markers of hormonal exposure.
Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23570938      PMCID: PMC3622946          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  38 in total

1.  Biological significance of interventions that change breast density.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Li Lan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

Authors:  C B Caldwell; S J Stapleton; D W Holdsworth; R A Jong; W J Weiser; G Cooke; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention.

Authors:  B Rockhill; D Spiegelman; C Byrne; D J Hunter; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies.

Authors:  T Key; P Appleby; I Barnes; G Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; A Heather Eliassen; Robert L Barbieri; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Anna Margolis; Li Lan; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Vineeta Singh; Christobel Saunders; Liz Wylie; Anita Bourke
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  7 in total

1.  Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI.

Authors:  Hui Li; William A Weiss; Milica Medved; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-28

2.  Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.

Authors:  Shonket Ray; Lin Chen; Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Aimilia Gastounioti; Elizabeth S McDonald; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; David Gur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for Estrogen-Receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-27

Review 7.  Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.