Literature DB >> 1457156

Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions.

C Wilkinson1.   

Abstract

Primary care professionals play a major role in the cervical screening programme in the United Kingdom, especially since the new contract for general practitioners. Many aspects of the programme are still the subject of broad debate and detailed research. New policies regarding the programme are generated at various levels; feedback is not always made directly available to primary care teams. This review article attempts to summarize the current available literature on cervical screening, focusing on the meaning of minor degrees of dysplasia, cervical cancer in younger women, the role of the wart virus, frequency of smear tests, diagnosis and treatment, counselling, and concludes with practical advice to help the practice team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1457156      PMCID: PMC1372177     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  42 in total

1.  Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy.

Authors:  M Skehan; W P Soutter; K Lim; T Krausz; J Pryse-Davies
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-09

2.  Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial.

Authors:  C Wilkinson; J M Jones; J McBride
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

3.  The use of cervicography in a primary screening service.

Authors:  A Szarewski; J Cuzick; R Edwards; B Butler; A Singer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-03

4.  Cervical cancer: need to look and recognise.

Authors:  M I Shafi; C B Finn; P Blomfield; E J Buxton; D M Leusley; J A Jordan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  The treatment of CIN: do we need lasers?

Authors:  J A Giles; A Gafar
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-01

6.  Oncogene expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer of cervix.

Authors:  S B Pinion; J H Kennedy; R W Miller; A B MacLean
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Human papillomavirus detection in cervical lesions nondiagnostic for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  G J Nuovo; J S Blanco; S Leipzig; D Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed.

Authors:  N D Morell; J R Taylor; R N Snyder; H K Ziel; A Saltz; S Willie
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Association between poor prognosis in early-stage invasive cervical carcinomas and non-detection of HPV DNA.

Authors:  G Riou; M Favre; D Jeannel; J Bourhis; V Le Doussal; G Orth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.

Authors:  G A Cook; G J Draper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

2.  Prospective evaluation of a risk scoring system for cervical neoplasia in primary care.

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; T J Peters; N C Stott; I M Harvey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  H Lester; S Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.