Literature DB >> 3924157

A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland.

J E Macgregor, S M Moss, D M Parkin, N E Day.   

Abstract

To estimate the relative risk of invasive cervical cancer in each succeeding year after a negative screening result the screening records of all women tested in the north east of Scotland were examined as the basis for a case-control study. The cases consisted of 115 women in whom invasive cervical cancer had been diagnosed in 1968-82 and who had appeared in the screening records at least once before diagnosis. For each patient five controls were selected from women of the same age who appeared in the screening records before the date of diagnosis in the patient. If the patient's cancer had been detected by screening the controls were chosen from women of the same age screened the same year. A comparison was made between cases and controls of the number of negative smears taken before the diagnosis. The results showed a high relative protection (inverse of the relative risk) in the first two years after a negative test, falling steadily as time since the last negative test elapsed. Even after 10 years, however, a considerable residual effect was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3924157      PMCID: PMC1415709          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.290.6481.1543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  12 in total

1.  Estimation of the duration of a pre-clinical disease state using screening data.

Authors:  S D Walter; N E Day
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study.

Authors:  E A Clarke; T W Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Mortality from carcinoma of cervix uteri in Britain.

Authors:  J E Macgregor; S Teper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Control definition in case-control studies of the efficacy of screening and diagnostic testing.

Authors:  N S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.

Authors:  N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Case definition in case-control studies of the efficacy of screening.

Authors:  A S Morrison
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Cervical cytology screening in two Yorkshire areas: pattern of service.

Authors:  D M Parkin; W Collins; A D Clayden
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.427

8.  [A case control study for the evaluation of the cytological detection of cancer of the cervix].

Authors:  L Raymond; M Obradovic; G Riotton
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.019

9.  "Pap" smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: quantitative estimates from a case-control study.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; S Franceschi; A Decarli; M Fasoli; A Gentile; G Tognoni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Ages and frequencies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  E G Knox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions.

Authors:  C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Confounding by dietary factors in case-control studies on the efficacy of cancer screening in Japan.

Authors:  Ko-Jun Suzuki; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Shoji Tokunaga; Tadashi Shimoyama; Takashi Umeda; Kazuo Sugawara
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Invasive cervical cancer among American Indian women in the Northern Plains, 1994-1998: incidence, mortality, and missed opportunities.

Authors:  Richard F Leman; David Espey; Nathaniel Cobb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  A B Miller; G Anderson; J Brisson; J Laidlaw; N Le Pitre; P Malcolmson; P Mirwaldt; G Stuart; W Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Interphase cytogenetic analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  J Bulten; P J Poddighe; J C Robben; J H Gemmink; P C de Wilde; A G Hanselaar
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  The abnormal cervical smear.

Authors:  A Singer
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-12-13

7.  Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-13

8.  Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.

Authors:  R Beardow; J Oerton; C Victor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

9.  The organization of cervical screening in general practice.

Authors:  C Havelock; R Edwards; J Cuzick; J Chamberlain
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-05

10.  A centralised cytology screening programme for cervical cancer in Florence.

Authors:  D Palli; S Carli; S Cecchini; A Venturini; G Piazzesi; E Buiatti
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.