| Literature DB >> 25028938 |
Stephen Buckley1, Donatella Usai2, Tina Jakob3, Anita Radini4, Karen Hardy5.
Abstract
Accessing information on plant consumption before the adoption of agriculture is challenging. However, there is growing evidence for use of locally available wild plants from an increasing number of pre-agrarian sites, suggesting broad ecological knowledge. The extraction of chemical compounds and microfossils from dental calculus removed from ancient teeth offers an entirely new perspective on dietary reconstruction, as it provides empirical results on material that is already in the mouth. Here we present a suite of results from the multi-period Central Sudanese site of Al Khiday. We demonstrate the ingestion in both pre-agricultural and agricultural periods of Cyperus rotundus tubers. This plant is a good source of carbohydrates and has many useful medicinal and aromatic qualities, though today it is considered to be the world's most costly weed. Its ability to inhibit Streptococcus mutans may have contributed to the unexpectedly low level of caries found in the agricultural population. Other evidence extracted from the dental calculus includes smoke inhalation, dry (roasting) and wet (heating in water) cooking, a second plant possibly from the Triticaceae tribe and plant fibres suggestive of raw material preparation through chewing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25028938 PMCID: PMC4100759 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Al Khiday.
(A) location map, (b) aerial photograph, excavation, (c) skeleton in situ, (d) dental calculus.
Results.
| Sample number | Tooth sampled | Calculus sample | Age | Sex | Period | Starch granules (Sg) and other material (present/absent – P/A) | TD/Py-GCMS |
|
| 11 | Lower right M3 | Distal supragingival | Adult | Female | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) Six type 1. Undamaged (P) | ||
| 12 | Lower right M3 | Lingual supragingival | 36–45 | Male | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) Seven, type 1, 2. Undamaged (P) | ||
| 35 | Upper right M2 | Buccal supragingival | 35+ | Male | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) One type 1. Undamaged | X | X |
| 41 | Lower left M3 | Distal supragingival | 18–35 | Female | Pre-Mesolithic | (P) | X | X |
| 55 | Lower right M3 | Buccal + Distal supragingival | 18–35 | Male | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) One type 2. Undamaged | ||
| 64 | Upper right M3 | Buccal supragingival | 18–35 | Male | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) One type 1. Undamaged (P) | X | X |
| 77 | Lower left M3 | Lingual supragingival | 35+ | Female | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) One type 2. Undamaged (P) | X | |
| 88 | Upper left M1 | Buccal supragingival | 18–35 | Male | Pre-Mesolithic | (Sg) One type 1. Undamaged. | ||
| 111 | Lower right M1 | Buccal supragingival | Adult | Male | Pre-Mesolithic | X | ||
| 8 | Lower left M3 | Lingual supragingival | 18–35 | Male | Neolithic | (P) | X | |
| 9 | Lower left M3 | Lingual supragingival | 35+ | Female | Neolithic | X | ||
| 10–1 | Lower right M2 | Lingual supragingival | 18–25 | Female | Neolithic | (P) | X | X |
| 93 | Lower right M1 + M3 | Lingual supragingival | 26–35 | Female | Neolithic | Eight type 2. Seven granules cracked (P) | X | |
| 96 | Upper left M3 | Buccal supragingival | 36–45 | Female | Neolithic | 17 granules. Type 2 x15 granules, type 3 x2 granules, 14 granules show diagenetic effects (P) | X | |
| 103 | Lower right M3 | Buccal supragingival | 45+ | Female | Neolithic | One type 2. Undamaged (P) | X | X |
| 104 | Lower left M3 | Lingual + Mesial supragingival | 45+ | Female | Neolithic | Six, type 2. One cracked (P) | ||
| 47 | Upper right M3 | Distalsupragingival | +45 | Female | Meroitic | X | ||
| 74 | Lower right M2 | Lingual supragingival | 18–35 | Female | Meroitic | (P) | X | X |
| 106 | Lower left M2 | Buccal supragingival | 36–45 | Male | Meroitic | Six damaged, one type 1. Five type 2, of which one cracked. One type 3 (P) | X | X |
Figure 2Starch granules extracted from dental calculus.
(A) grave 11, polyhedral starch granule type 1. Superficially similar to Cyperus rotundus L. (note the small flecks of adhering calculus around the edge), (b) grave 104, oval starch granule type 2, (c) grave 96, partially degraded type 2 starch granules, swollen and with extinction cross losing clarity. A smaller swollen granule is also lodged in the remains of the cellular wall (top left arrow), and a fleck of soil (bottom right arrow), (d) grave 96, small round type 3 starch (arrow), with a part of larger type 2 starch nearby, both starch granules are still partially embedded in dental calculus matrix, (e and f) grave 93, two starch granules in which morphology has been lost due to processing and/or cooking, note the large cracks at their margins. Scale bars are all 20 microns.
Figure 3Reconstructed total ion chromatogram of the thermal desorption profiles (310°C for 10s) of human calculus samples.
Figure 3a. (A) Pre-Mesolithic Burial 35, (b) Neolithic Burial 10I, (c) Neolithic Burial 103 and (d) Meroitic Burial 74. The structures of the terpenoid compounds characteristic of C. rotundus are shown, i.e. the main monoterpenoid compounds identified: α-pinene, p-cymene and limonene, and the main sesquiterpenoid compounds identified: calarene (β-gurjunene), rotundene, γ-muurolene, α-muurolene, calamenene, calamene and cadalene. The filled square, n-C12 indicates dodecene (see text). Figure 3b . Reconstructed total ion chromatogram of the thermal desorption profile (310°C for 10s) of human calculus, Burial 74, 5.46 mg. Peak identities (x indicates carbon chain length): filled squares, Cx indicates alkenes; filled circles; filled triangles indicates C16 - C23 methyl, ethyl- and butyl- branched alkanes; filled diamonds, Cx indicates alkylcyclohexanes. Also shown are the structures of chlorobenzene, seven monoterpenoid compounds identified: α-pinene, trans-carane, p-cymene, limonene, β-phellandrene, 2-carene and p-cymenene, and seven sesquiterpenoid compounds identified: calarene (β-gurjunene), rotundene, γ-muurolene, calamenene, calamene, cadalene and guaiazulene. In addition, sequiterpenoid compounds numbered 1 to 12 were identified as: 1 = norrotundene, 2 = α -copaene, 3 = cubinene (cadina-1,4-diene), 4 = α-cedrene, 5 = unidentified sesquiterpenoid, 6 = γ-selinene, 7 = α-muurolene, 8 = γ-cadinene, 9 = α-cadinene, 10 = calacorenes (×3), 11 = dehydrocadalene, 12 = an isomer of cadalene. SO2 indicates sulphur dioxide. Inset displays a reconstructed total ion chromatogram of the pyrolysis profile (610°C for 10 s) of this sample, after thermal desorption (310°C for 10 s). Peak identities: filled squares, Cx indicates alkenes, open diamonds indicates propenenitrile and butenenitrile. Also shown are the structures of ten aromatic compounds identified: benzene, pyridine, toluene, styrene, p-xylene (coeluting with styrene), 2-chloropyridine, benzonitrile, naphthalene, biphenyl and 2-phenylpyridine, and three polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons: phenanthrene, fluoranthene and pyrene. SO2 again indicates sulphur dioxide.