Literature DB >> 24986630

The influence of amalgam fillings on the detection of approximal caries by cone beam CT: in vitro study.

T Kulczyk1, M Dyszkiewicz Konwińska, M Owecka, J Krzyżostaniak, A Surdacka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this CBCT investigation on the detection of caries was to assess the influence of artefacts produced by the presence of amalgam fillings located in the vicinity.
METHODS: 102 non-cavitated pre-molar and molar teeth were placed in blocks of silicone with approximal contacts consisting of 3 sound or carious teeth and 1 mesial-occlusal-distal amalgam-filled tooth in-between. Radiographs of all the teeth were recorded using the CBCT system (NewTom™ 3G; QR Srl, Verona, Italy; field of view, 9 inches). Data from the CBCT unit were reconstructed and sectioned in the mesiodistal tooth plane. Images were evaluated twice by two observers, using a five-step confidence scale. After the CBCT examination, the teeth were individually sectioned in the mesiodistal direction with a diamond saw. Using a light microscope at ×40 magnification, the true morphological status of all approximal surfaces was established.
RESULTS: Sensitivity of the CBCT for the detection of caries on surfaces located proximally and distally to an amalgam filing ranged from 0.27 to 0.30 for enamel and from 0.47 to 0.56 for dentin. Specificity values for enamel proximal and distal lesions were 0.48 and 0.53, respectively, for enamel and 0.33 to 0.38, respectively, for proximal and distal dentin cases. Intra-observer reliability was 0.84, and interobserver reliability was 0.49.
CONCLUSIONS: Owing to its low specificity, scans from a CBCT examination should not be used to determine the presence of demineralization of the tooth surface when amalgam fillings are present in the region of interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; amalgam; artefacts; caries

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986630      PMCID: PMC4170842          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  18 in total

1.  Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels; Harry Stamatakis; Hilde Bosmans; Ria Bogaerts; Reinhilde Jacobs; Keith Horner; Kostas Tsiklakis
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.

Authors:  Saadettin Kayipmaz; Ömer Said Sezgin; Senem Tuğra Saricaoğlu; Gamze Çan
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Yiannis Kyriakou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries.

Authors:  Ryoko Tsuchida; Kazuyuki Araki; Tomohiro Okano
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-07-06

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.

Authors:  F Haiter-Neto; A Wenzel; E Gotfredsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries.

Authors:  S M Young; J T Lee; R J Hodges; T-L Chang; D A Elashoff; S C White
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants.

Authors:  Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze; Dorothea Berndt; Bernd d'Hoedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.

Authors:  P Mozzo; C Procacci; A Tacconi; P T Martini; I A Andreis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review.

Authors:  R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Contrast-to-noise ratio difference in small field of view cone beam computed tomography machines.

Authors:  Boulos Bechara; Clyde A McMahan; William S Moore; Marcel Noujeim; Hassem Geha; Fabricio B Teixeira
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries.

Authors:  Oya Şeker; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Cihan Şahin; Nejlan Eratam; Esra Ece Çakmak; Gül Sönmez; Doğukan Özen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effects of various cone-beam computed tomography settings on the detection of recurrent caries under restorations in extracted primary teeth.

Authors:  Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Gül Sönmez; Zeynep Serap Berktaş; Hakan Kurt; Doĝukan Özen
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-06-22

3.  Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.