| Literature DB >> 24971792 |
Lukas Choleva1, Zuzana Musilova2, Alena Kohoutova-Sediva3, Jan Paces4, Petr Rab5, Karel Janko6.
Abstract
Distinguishing between hybrid introgression and incomplete lineage sorting causing incongruence among gene trees in that they exhibit topological differences requires application of statistical approaches that are based on biologically relevant models. Such study is especially challenging in hybrid systems, where usual vectors mediating interspecific gene transfers--hybrids with Mendelian heredity--are absent or unknown. Here we study a complex of hybridizing species, which are known to produce clonal hybrids, to discover how one of the species, Cobitis tanaitica, has achieved a pattern of mito-nuclear mosaic genome over the whole geographic range. We appplied three distinct methods, including the method using solely the information on gene tree topologies, and found that the contrasting mito-nuclear signal might not have resulted from the retention of ancestral polymorphism. Instead, we found two signs of hybridization events related to C. tanaitica; one concerning nuclear gene flow and the other suggested mitochondrial capture. Interestingly, clonal inheritance (gynogenesis) of contemporary hybrids prevents genomic introgressions and non-clonal hybrids are either absent or too rare to be detected among European Cobitis. Our analyses therefore suggest that introgressive hybridizations are rather old episodes, mediated by previously existing hybrids whose inheritance was not entirely clonal. Cobitis complex thus supports the view that the type of resulting hybrids depends on a level of genomic divergence between sexual species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24971792 PMCID: PMC4074047 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Photographs, karyotypes and Europe-wide distribution of spined loach sexual species (Cobitis) from this study.
(A,C,E) Photographs (scale bar = 1 cm) and (B,D,F) respective karyotypes of three widespread Cobitis species. Karyograms with diploid chromosome number (2n), metacentric (m), submetacentric (sm), subtelocentric (st), and acrocentric chromosomes (a) were modified after Janko et al. [50]; (G) Sampling localities of Cobitis taenia (light gray squares; 1–10), C. elongatoides (dark gray squares; 11–20), C. tanaitica (black squares; 21–30), C. paludica (checkered square; 31), C. fahirae (spotted square; 32), and C. vardarensis (reticulated square; 33). Insets show European species distribution with respective markings as given in squares. Note that locality no. 1 is situated more eastward, as marked by the arrow.
Summary of nucleotide variation.
| Locus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 280 | 1, 1, 1, 2 | 0, 0, 0, 1 | 0 | 0.000±0.000, 0.000±0.000, 0.000±0.000, 0.452±0.042 | 0.000±0.000, 0.000±0.000, 0.000±0.000, 0.002±0.001 |
|
| 306–330 | 3, 3, 2, 7 | 2, 3, 2, 7 | 0, 2, 0, 2 | 0.626±0.104, 0.530±0.136, 0.556±0.075, 0.802±0.042 | 0.003±0.001, 0.002±0.002, 0.003±0.002, 0.005±0.002 |
|
| 206–212 | 1, 5, 2, 7 | 0, 4, 2, 8 | 1, 0, 1, 1 | 0.000±0.000, 0.632±0.088, 0.189±0.108, 0.563±0.065 | 0.000±0.000, 0.006±0.003, 0.002±0.002, 0.009±0.003 |
|
| 435–514 | 1, 5,1, 6 | 0, 7,0, 10 | 0, 2, 0, 2 | 0.000±0.000, 0.758±0.077, 0.000±0.000, 0.533±0.071 | 0.000±0.000, 0.003±0.001, 0.000±0.000, 0.008±0.001 |
|
| 278–648 | 1, 3, 1, 5 | 0, 2, 0, 15 | 1, 1, 1, 2 | 0.000±0.000, 1.000±0.272, 0.000±0.000, 1.000±0.126 | 0.000±0.000, 0.002±0.001, 0.000±0.000, 0.014±0.003 |
|
| 548–567 | 3, 2, 4, 7 | 2, 2, 3, 13 | 1, 0, 1, 1 | 0.582±0.142, 0.200±0.154, 0.773±0.083, 0.801±0.037 | 0.002±0:001, 0.001±0.001, 0.002±0.001, 0.008±0.001 |
|
| 653 | 5, 6, 2, 13 | 3, 7, 7,11 | 0 | 0.711±0.085, 0.837±0.047, 0.837±0.047, 0.820±0.032 | 0.001±0.001, 0.005±0.001, 0.005±0.001, 0.005±0.001 |
|
| 507–515 | 1, 2, 1, 3 | 0, 1, 0, 7 | 0 | 0.000±0.000, 0.100±0.088, 0.000±0.000, 0.463±0.047 | 0.000±0.000, 0.000±0.000, 0.000±0.000, 0.005±0.001 |
|
| 575–592 | 7, 3, 3, 13 | 4, 3, 4, 29 | 1, 4, 3, 6 | 1.000±0.076, 1.000±0.272, 1.000±0.177, 1.000±0.027 | 0.003±0.001, 0.003±0.002, 0.004±0.002, 0.019±0.003 |
|
| 1088 | 5, 10, 8, 23 | 9, 19, 20, 78 | 0 | 1.000±0.126, 1.000±0.045, 1.000±0.063, 1.000±0.013 | 0.003±0.001, 0.005±0.001, 0.007±0.002, 0.021±0:002 |
Data are in the order for C. taenia; C. elongatoides; C. tanaitica; and all three species. Cobitis fahirae, C. vardarensis and C. paludica were sequenced as one individual per species per locus and not summarised. L, sequence length (bp); h, number of haplotypes; S, number of polymorphic sites.
Spined loaches (Cobitis) used in this study.
| Taxon | Map No., Locality, Country | Coordinates | Locus and Haplotype | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 1, Bolsh. Uzen' R., Kazakhstan | 49.653N, 49.479E | H1 | H1,H2 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 |
| 2, Haaren Cr., Germany | 53.083N, 7.833E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H2 | H1 | H2,H3 | H2 | |
| 3, Alma R., Ukraine | 44.586N, 33.619E | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | |
| 4, Odra R., Germany | 52.569N, 14.604E | H1 | H2,H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1, H3 | H1 | H1,H4 | H3 | |
| 5, Kodyma R., Ukraine | 47.936N, 30.765E | H1 | H2,H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1,H2 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H4 | |
| 6, Smortawa R., Poland | 50.983N, 17.367E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H1 | H1,H5 | H5 | |
| 7, Malaren L., Sweden | 59.276N, 17.659E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H2 | H1,H5 | H1 | H6 | H1 | |
| 8, Wite Nete, Belgium | 51.108N, 4.531E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H6,H7 | H1 | |
| 9, Dnieper R., Russia | 55.573N, 33.137E | H1 | H1,H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | |
| 10, Seine R., France | 48.300N, 4.083E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H1 | H6 | H1 | |
|
| 11, Odra R., Poland | 50.883N 17.717E | H2 | H4 | H2,H3 | H2,H3 | H2 | H4 | H6,H7 | H2 | H8 | H6 |
| 12, Tazlau, Romania | 46.405N, 6.729E | H2 | H4,H5 | H3,H4 | H6 | H2,H5 | H4 | H6 | H2 | H9 | H7 | |
| 13, Prut R., Romania | 46.199N, 28.033E | H2 | H5 | H3,H5 | H4 | H2,H5 | H4 | H7 | H2 | H8 | H8 | |
| 14, Spree R., Germany | 51.363N, 14.514E | H2 | H5,H6 | H3 | H3,H6 | H2 | H4 | H8 | H2 | H8 | H9 | |
| 15, Pšovka Cr., Czech Rep. | 50.370N, 14.552E | H2 | H5 | H3 | H4 | H2 | H4 | H9 | H2 | H8 | H10 | |
| 16, Mur R., Austria | 47.262N, 14.583E | H2 | H4 | H2 | H4 | H2 | H4 | H8 | H2 | H8 | H11 | |
| 17, Comana, Romania | 44.168N, 26.148E | H2 | H5 | H3,H6 | H4 | H2 | H4 | H10 | H2 | H8 | H12 | |
| 18, Szodrakosz Cr., Hungary | 47.733N, 19.133E | H2 | H5 | H2 | H4 | H2,H5 | H4 | H7,H11 | H2 | H8 | H13 | |
| 19, Kamchya R., Bulgaria | 43.029N, 27.535E | H2 | H5 | H2,H3 | H4,H5 | H3 | H5 | H7,H11 | H2 | H8,H10 | H14 | |
| 20, Kirčevo, Bulgaria | 43.031N, 24.364E | H2 | H5 | H3,H4 | H3 | H2 | H4 | H7,H11 | H2,H3 | H8 | H15 | |
|
| 21, Sinoe L. , Romania | 44.633N, 28.883E | H1 | H7 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H1 | H12 | H1 | H11 | H16 |
| 22, Odra R., Poland | 50.883N, 17.717E | H1 | H7 | H1,H7 | H1 | H4 | H1 | H12 | H1 | H11 | H17 | |
| 23, Manych R., Russia | 45.991N, 43.429E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H6 | H13 | H1 | H12 | H18 | |
| 24, Manych R., Russia | 45.991N, 43.429E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H6 | H13 | H1 | H12 | H18 | |
| 25, Kuban R., Russia | 44.828N, 41.769E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H6 | H13 | H1 | H13 | H18 | |
| 26, Kuban R., Russia | 44.828N, 41.769E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H6 | H13 | H1 | H13 | H19 | |
| 27, Kuban R., Russia | 44.828N, 41.769E | H1 | H3 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H7 | H13 | H1 | H13 | H20 | |
| 28, Sinoe L., Romania | 44.633N, 28.883E | H1 | H7 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H2 | H12 | H1 | H11 | H21 | |
| 29, Sinoe L., Romania | 44.633N, 28.883E | H1 | H7 | H1,H7 | H1 | H4 | H2 | H12 | H1 | H11 | H22 | |
| 30, Sinoe L., Romania | 44.633N, 28.883E | H1 | H7 | H1 | H1 | H4 | H2 | H12 | H1 | H11 | H23 | |
|
| 32, Manyas L., Turkey | 40.133N, 28.049E | H3 | H8 | H8 | H7 | H6 | H8 | H14 | H4 | H14 | H24 |
|
| 33, Treska R., Albania | 42.000N, 21.335E | H4 | H9 | H9 | H8 | H7 | H9 | H15 | H5 | H15 | H25 |
|
| 31, Duraton R., Spain | 41.366N,−3.902W | H5 | H10 | H10 | H9 | H8 | H10 | H16 | H6 | H16 | H26 |
Figure 2Phylogenetic comparison of gene trees constructed from nuclear and mitochondrial gene markers and mito-nuclear discordance.
Bayesian DNA gene trees constructed from nine nuclear gene markers and one mitochondrial cytb gene marker were rooted with sequences from C. paludica. Haplotype numbers correspond to Table 2. Bar represents 0.1 substitution/site. The schematic tree shows the phylogenetic conflict of C. tanaitica topology between mitochondrial and nuclear gene markers.
Figure 3Probability densities of four parameters in coalescence simulation as functions of length of internode.
Graphical visualization in which (1–PConcord-mtDNA) denotes the probability density of observing discordant mtDNA phylo tree; (Pbinom-nuc) denotes the probability density of observing eight topologically concordant nuclear gene trees out nine studied nuclear loci in total; (PCoal-mtDNA) denotes the cumulative probability of mtDNA coalescence along the internode and (PCoal-nuc) denotes the cumulative probability of coalescence of nuclear locus along the internode. Note that there is very small intersection of probability densities allowing for observing eight out of nine topologically concordant nuclear loci while having discordant mtDNA tree (see the text for details).
Prior and posterior distributions of parameters in the BPP Bayesian analysis of the nine nuclear loci.
| Parameter | Gamma prior | Prior | Posterior |
| (α, β) | Mean (95% interval) | Mean (95% interval) | |
|
| (2, 617) | 0.003240 (0.000390, 0.009030) | 0.004711 (0.001715, 0.010027) |
|
| 0.003240 (0.000390, 0.009030) | 0.002253 (0.000542, 0.006071) | |
|
| 0.003240 (0.000390, 0.009030) | 0.004988 (0.002547, 0.008695) | |
|
| 0.003240 (0.000390, 0.009030) | 0.002799 (0.000694, 0.005922) | |
|
| 0.003240 (0.000390, 0.009030) | 0.003333 (0.000439, 0.008074) | |
|
| (2, 167.8) | 0.011920 (0.001440, 0.033200) | 0.005595 (0.003016, 0.007991) |
|
| from analysis | 0.001573 (0.000628, 0.002936) |
Priors set with Ne = 225,000 covering Watterson's [91] θ estimate (θ W = 0.002, Ne = 138,889) and from branching event t = 3.31 Mya between European closely related Cobitis species [104]. Relatively fast autosomal mutation rate (μ) of 3.6×10−9 estimated in vertebrates [105] was used to transform prior expectations of θ and τ from absolute estimates of N and t. Both τ and θ are measured as the expected number of mutations per site.
Prior for the node age was generated from the Dirichlet distribution ([63]: equation 2).
C. tae = C. taenia, C. tan = C. tanaitica, C. elo = C. elongatoides.
Figure 4Parameters calculated from alternative tests using sequence data to explain C. tanaitica mito-nuclear discordance.
Contemporary and ancestral population sizes are denoted by (θ, θ , θ , θ, θ). Divergence times are denoted by (τ and τ), and interval between those times is denoted by (γ). Migration rates are denoted by (m) with relevant index. All parameters are scaled by mutation rate μ, and can be converted to absolute values using the relations θ = 4Nμ (where N is effective population size), m = m/μ (where m is gene-flow rates per gene copy per generation, τ = tμ (where t is a time of population splitting at τ generations in the past), and γ = tμ. Parameters estimated by BPP program are denoted by ($), those by IM by (#), and those by IMa2 by (@). The parameter γ was calculated from τs given by BPP and ds programmes. C. taenia (C.tae), C. tanaitica (C. tan), and C. elongatoides (C. elo).
Figure 5Posterior probability distributions for migration rates from two-population IM analysis.
Coalescent-based estimates of migration rates (scaled by mutation rate) for three studied species inferred separately from (A–C) nuclear sequence data that included nine nuclear markers, and from (D–H) one mitochondrial marker gene.
Figure 6Posterior probability distributions for migration rates from three-population IMa2 analysis.
Coalescent-based estimates of migration rates (scaled by mutation rate) for three studied species inferred from (A–C) nine nuclear markers and (D–F) combined mito-nuclear sequence data that included one mitochondrial marker gene and nine nuclear markers.