| Literature DB >> 21939538 |
Fernando Sequeira1, Davidson Sodré, Nuno Ferrand, José A R Bernardi, Iracilda Sampaio, Horacio Schneider, Marcelo Vallinoto.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The classical perspective that interspecific hybridization in animals is rare has been changing due to a growing list of empirical examples showing the occurrence of gene flow between closely related species. Using sequence data from cyt b mitochondrial gene and three intron nuclear genes (RPL9, c-myc, and RPL3) we investigated patterns of nucleotide polymorphism and divergence between two closely related toad species R. marina and R. schneideri. By comparing levels of differentiation at nuclear and mtDNA levels we were able to describe patterns of introgression and infer the history of hybridization between these species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21939538 PMCID: PMC3192708 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Geographic distribution of . (A) Species distribution area [23]. (B) Sampling localities coded as in Additional file 1. White and black circles represent sample localities of R. marina from Left Amazon river bank (LAB) and Right Amazon river bank (RAB), respectively, and gray circles correspond to sample localities of R. schneideri. The map was designed using DIVA-GIS [96]. Gray layer is the land cover according to the tree cover, broadleaved, and evergreen option.
Summary statistics, neutrality and recombination tests for each locus.
| Loci/species | N(1) | Total Sites | H | S | Tajima's | Fu's | R2 | Rm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 504 (495) | 19 | 22 | 0.752 | 0.939 | -0.619 | -5.138* | 0.099 | 3 | 0.665 | |
| LAB | 20 | 504 (497) | 7 | 9 | 0.324 | 0.510 | -1.256 (0.08) | -1.882 | 0.100 | 0 | |
| RAB | 44 | 504 (496) | 15 | 22 | 0.917 | 1.019 | -0.329 | -2.892 | 0.083 | 2 | |
| 30 | 504 (489) | 11 | 16 | 0.715 | 0.877 | -0.632 | -2.470 | 0.104 | 3 | 0.322 | |
| 80 | 678 (662) | 19 | 23 | 0.525 | 0.701 | -0.760 | -4.692 (0.07) | 0.149 | 2 | 0.222 | |
| LAB | 16 | 678 (665) | 6 | 9 | 0.426 | 0.407 | 0.164 | 0.252 | 0.088 | 0 | |
| RAB | 64 | 678 (665) | 14 | 17 | 0.456 | 0.540 | -0.469 | -2.415 | 0.074 | 2 | |
| 30 | 678 (675) | 10 | 7 | 0.328 | 0.261 | 0.759 | -2.689 (0.07) | 0.153 | 2 | 0.273 | |
| 52 | 585 (578) | 10 | 8 | 0.144 | 0.340 | -1.599* | -6.328* | 0.190 | 0 | 1.0 | |
| LAB | 10 | 585 (578) | 3 | 2 | 0.113 | 0.120 | -0.184 | -0.272 | 0.055* | 0 | |
| RAB | 42 | 585 (578) | 10 | 8 | 0.149 | 0.357 | -1.687* | -6.706** | 0.053* | 0 | |
| 24 | 585 (577) | 6 | 5 | 0.209 | 0.232 | -0.279 | -1.399 | 0.120 | 0 | 1.0 | |
| LAB | 22 | 327 | 5 | 4 | 0.338 | 0.336 | 0.017 | -0.7394 | 0.146 | - | - |
| RAB | 43 | 327 | 9 | 10 | 0.904 | 0.707 | 0.819 | 0.01 | 0.140 | - | - |
| 27 | 327 | 5 | 4 | 0.131 | 0.317 | -1.555* | -3.074** | 0.083 | - | - |
N, number of sequences; H, number of haplotypes; S, number of segregating sites; π, nucleotide diversity; θ, Watterson population mutation parameter [71]; Rm, minimum number of recombination events [73]; and, Φw statistic p-value [74].
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. (1) Considering the two copies in the case of nuclear loci.
Figure 2Mitochondrial . (A) Haplotype genealogy from Maximum likelihood of cyt b gene tree performed in the software Haploviewer. The model of nucleotide substitution for ML of cyt b gene was K81uf + G (0.047). (B) Geographic distribution of haplotypes present in R. marina from Left Amazon river bank (LAB) and Right Amazon river bank (RAB), and in R. schneideri. The Circle area of each haplotype, coded as a number (Additional file 1), is proportional to its frequency. Asterisks mark haplotypes present in both species. Dots represent inferred unsampled or extinct haplotypes.
Figure 3Nuclear genealogies. (A) Haplotype genealogy from Maximum likelihood analysis of RPL9, (B) RPL3 and (C) c-myc performed in the software Haploviewer. Models of nucleotide substitution used for ML were: TN93+G (0.095) for RPL9; TVM + G (0.014) for RPL3; and, K81uf + G (0.015) for c-myc. (D) Bayesian inference of species tree based on nuclear data performed in *BEAST. Bayesian posterior probabilities are above branches. (E) Geographic distribution of haplotypes observed in R. marina from Left Amazon river bank (LAB) and Right Amazon river bank (RAB), and in R. schneideri. The circle area of each haplotype, coded as a number (Additional file 1), is proportional to its frequency. Haplotypes delimited by a dotted line represent sequences clustered within R. schneideri that are present in three heterozygous R. marina individuals. Dots represent inferred unsampled or extinct haplotypes.
Polymorphism and sequence divergence for each locus.
| Average Differences | Dxy (%) | Da (%) | ψ | ψ 1 | ψ 2 | ψ Shared | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAB × RAB | 3.843 | 0.776 | 0.206 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 8 |
| LAB × | 14.167 | 2.921 | 2.451 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 0 |
| RAB × | 15.081 | 3.115 | 2.288 | 6 | 20 | 16 | 1 |
| LAB × RAB | 4.436 (4.270)* | 0.670 (0.642)* | 0.226 (0.227)* | 0 | 6 | 14 (9)* | 3 |
| LAB × | 10.102 | 1.519 | 1.1139 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 1 |
| RAB × | 9.158 (9.402)* | 1.377 (1.407)* | 0.982 (1.040)* | 1 (5)* | 17 (12)* | 7 | 0 |
| LAB × RAB | 0.81 | 0.138 | 0.006 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
| LAB × | 5.317 | 0.926 | 0.762 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| RAB × | 5.270 | 0.918 | 0.736 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
| LAB × RAB | 7.498 | 2.292 | 1.672 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| LAB × | 7.029 | 2.149 | 1.915 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| RAB × | 3.258 | 0.996 | 0.479 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 |
D, average pairwise number of nucleotide substitutions per site; D, average pairwise net nucleotide divergence; ψ, number of polymorphic sites exclusive of each group or species; ψ 1; refers to the first species/group listed in each pairwise comparison.
*Removing the R. schneideri haplotypes (H13 and H14) present in three R. marina heterozygous from population CC (see Fig. 3).
Maximum-likelihood estimates and 95% HPD (highest posterior density intervals) of divergence time (t) inferred by Isolation-with-Migration model (IMa2) for different pairwise comparisons.
| Comparison | Markers | t (Myr.) |
|---|---|---|
| (LAB + RAB) × | nDNA | 1.690 (0.551-9.823)? |
| LAB × RAB b | nDNA | 0.325 (0.068-7.134)? |
| LAB × RAB c | mtDNA | 1.592 (0.861-6.444) |
| LAB × (RAB + | mtDNA | 1.668 (0.759-11.076)? |
| (LAB + RAB) × (RAB + | nDNA + mtDNA | 1.734 (0.644-8.936)? |
a R. marina (LAB + RAB) and R. schneideri using nuclear loci.
b R. marina (LAB) × R. marina (RAB) using nuclear loci and mtDNA. c R. marina (LAB) × R. marina (RAB) using mtDNA.
d R. marina (LAB) × [R. marina (RAB) + R. schneideri] using mtDNA.
e R. marina and R. schneideri combining all markers and assuming that mtDNA from RAB population belongs to R. schneideri. ? values corresponding to the cases where parameters could not be reliably estimated.