BACKGROUND: Genomic testing in cancer (GTC) characterizes genes that play an important role in the development and growth of a patient's cancer. This form of DNA testing is currently being studied for its ability to guide cancer therapy. The objective of the current study was to describe patients' knowledge, attitudes, and expectations toward GTC. METHODS: A 42-item self-administered GTC questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary group and patient pretesting. The questionnaire was distributed to patients with advanced cancer who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Center for a phase 1 clinical trial or GTC testing. RESULTS: Results were reported from 98 patients with advanced cancer, representing 66% of the patients surveyed. Seventy-six percent of patients were interested in learning more about GTC, and 64% reported that GTC would significantly improve their cancer care. The median score on a 12-item questionnaire to assess knowledge of cancer genomics was 8 of 12 items correct (67%; interquartile range, 7-9 of 12 items correct [58%-75%]). Scores were associated significantly with patients' education level (P < .0001). Sixty-six percent of patients would consent to a needle biopsy, and 39% would consent to an invasive surgical biopsy if required for GTC. Only 48% of patients reported having sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision to pursue GTC whereas 34% of patients indicated a need for formal genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced cancer are motivated to participate in GTC. Patients require further education to understand the difference between somatic and germline mutations in the context of GTC. Educational programs are needed to support patients interested in pursuing GTC.
BACKGROUND: Genomic testing in cancer (GTC) characterizes genes that play an important role in the development and growth of a patient's cancer. This form of DNA testing is currently being studied for its ability to guide cancer therapy. The objective of the current study was to describe patients' knowledge, attitudes, and expectations toward GTC. METHODS: A 42-item self-administered GTC questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary group and patient pretesting. The questionnaire was distributed to patients with advanced cancer who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Center for a phase 1 clinical trial or GTC testing. RESULTS: Results were reported from 98 patients with advanced cancer, representing 66% of the patients surveyed. Seventy-six percent of patients were interested in learning more about GTC, and 64% reported that GTC would significantly improve their cancer care. The median score on a 12-item questionnaire to assess knowledge of cancer genomics was 8 of 12 items correct (67%; interquartile range, 7-9 of 12 items correct [58%-75%]). Scores were associated significantly with patients' education level (P < .0001). Sixty-six percent of patients would consent to a needle biopsy, and 39% would consent to an invasive surgical biopsy if required for GTC. Only 48% of patients reported having sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision to pursue GTC whereas 34% of patients indicated a need for formal genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with advanced cancer are motivated to participate in GTC. Patients require further education to understand the difference between somatic and germline mutations in the context of GTC. Educational programs are needed to support patients interested in pursuing GTC.
Authors: Ana P M Pinheiro; Rachel H Pocock; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Walid L Shaib; Suresh S Ramalingam; Rebecca D Pentz Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nassim Anderson; Arash Delavar; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Vijai Joseph; Nidha Mubdi; Kevin C Oeffinger; Charles A Sklar; Kenneth Offit; Matthew Matasar; Nirupa Raghunathan; Zoltan Antal; David Straus; Michael Walsh; Alicia Latham; Emily S Tonorezos Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2020-07-16
Authors: Betina Yanez; Laura C Bouchard; David Cella; Jeffrey A Sosman; Sheetal M Kircher; Nisha A Mohindra; Massimo Cristofanilli; Frank J Penedo Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Deevakar Rogith; Rafeek A Yusuf; Shelley R Hovick; Bryan M Fellman; Susan K Peterson; Allison M Burton-Chase; Yisheng Li; Elmer V Bernstam; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Rebecca D Pentz; Minisha Lohani; Melissa Hayban; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Richard J DeFeo; Gregg M Orloff; Ashesh B Jani; Viraj A Master Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Grace C Hillyer; Karen M Schmitt; Andria Reyes; Alejandro Cruz; Maria Lizardo; Gary K Schwartz; Mary Beth Terry Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Ilana B Solomon; Sarah McGraw; Jenny Shen; Adem Albayrak; Gil Alterovitz; Melanie Davies; Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz; Rachel A Freedman; Lisa N Lopez; Lynette M Sholl; Eliezer Van Allen; Joanne Mortimer; Marwan Fakih; Sumanta Pal; Karen L Reckamp; Yuan Yuan; Stacy W Gray Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-04-14